lazy8

I've done VHS --> DVD before using they ol trusty VHS player (had to blow the dust off) and a ATI AIW 9600, Just captured the vid threw the cable input while I watched the vhs. Then I had it saved on HD an could do anything to it I wanted. hope this helps.

look like any upgrades are comming twards SC?? I could use some more ul this 384 crap is just that; CRAP an RR gets' enough of my $$ so the whole premium garbage is not an option lol

06 is beast... it makes my PC cry..

I don't really think Bill is gonna give anything away. Here is something really twisted for thought. Lets say MS has come up with something that will scan your comp or something to make sure that everything is in "order". If this scan finds something that is amiss; Wamo comp locks up, freezes, deletes itself, goes into thermo-melt down and burns at your feet. Moral of the story is you are out of a comp, must spend more $$ either building or buying a new comp, and MS along with all the other companies are going to make more money. lol so yeah check that senerio out

http://gameadvisor.futuremark.com/gameadvisor/service/my_system.jsp?sysInfoId=2693916

Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2 7 ms 5 ms 5 ms 3 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms gig2-1.clmascpaw-rtr1.sc.rr.com [24.31.192.97] 4 10 ms 9 ms 12 ms srp4-0.clmascmhe-rtr1.sc.rr.com [24.31.193.129] 5 22 ms 21 ms 20 ms son0-1-1.rlghncrdc-rtr3.nc.rr.com [24.93.64.117] 6 29 ms 29 ms 38 ms so-9-1.car1.Washington1.Level3.net [67.29.172.9] 7 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms ae-2-54.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121.97 ] 8 62 ms 62 ms 61 ms as-1-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [209.247.9.102] 9 62 ms 62 ms 61 ms ae-23-52.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.47] 10 60 ms 62 ms 61 ms 4.78.220.10 11 62 ms 60 ms 60 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 12 59 ms 61 ms 60 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 13 63 ms 62 ms 61 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 14 63 ms 63 ms 61 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete. My speed has fallen off drasticly in the last month or so. I was solid 4.9 5.2 range now I do good to get this :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2064 Kbps about 2.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 252 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Jan 13 19:35:51 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 37X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.06 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 48.12 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8Q92KUN6O

whoaaa crazy double post....sorry about that http://alogan2.photosite.com/Monty/score.html

Storage? who needs storage I am going for 1TB tho ^^ I wanna do it just to do it for the most part. but I gotta get 2 new drives to do it right =P I've been thinking about taking the two IDE drives that I have an plugging them into 40-1 pin RAID slot and doing something with it. Only thing that I'm conserned about is that one is a WD 160GB an the other is a WD 250GB and I'm pretty sure you can't use two different dirve sizes. I think somewhere I saw that it would use only 160 of the 250GB drive to equal it out. But I really have no clue. Also what would it do to my speeds, if anything. Or would the IDE drive array just be slower than the Sata array? Here are my current scores; so what do you guys think about the idea?

thanks for the help guys it works like a champ

cool thanks I'll give it a shot

ah na the RAID 0 is using 2 SATA Segate Barracuda 250gig drives. I've got a WD 250gig IDE drive that I would like to add as storage, I'm not trying to use one SATA an one IDE drive to make a RAID. I'm wondering if I can add it on the "side" so to say lol

I'm trying to add a IDE hardrive to a Sata RAID 0 setup, and it dosen't wanna seem to let me do it. How should I go about doing this? Everytime I add the IDE hardrive to the primary IDE port it wont let windows boot, my bios dosen't even seem to see my RAID 0. But when I take the drive back out windows loads fine bios sees RAID 0 fine DVD that is on the secondary IDE works fine an everything is normal. What am I doing wrong? or hey maybe I've just got everything screwed up haha.

3DMarks03 demo 12881 P4 3.4 OC to 3.6 2GB DDR400 WD160 IDE WD250 IDE ATI X850 XT PE 550 watt ps

well then WD160 WD250 both 7200rpm 160 about 90% free 250, 37% free

here is a test I just did with my FW up an this is farrrrrrrr from right, so try disabling FW, virus, an real time scanners, :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 58077 Kbps about 58.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 7089 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sat Oct 15 2005 15:20:28 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1037X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.14 sec Diagnosis: Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-V7AGYZBT8

They don't. Unless you happen to be somebody or know somebody that can open up the flood gates for you. <--very disgruntle RR subscriber

wow good stuff.. thats amazing work keep it comen this is great question. do the full versions of the vids look like those pictures?

That vid was amazing I would love to see more of your work. an I don't mind dl a gig or better to see some of it

could I get the link also please I would really like to try it

here is the other topiic same thing.. http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-8315.msg81015;topicseen#msg81015

Here are my speeds for 5000/384.. If you need or use that extra upload keep it. If not get your 50 bucks back or thats what I would do.. I don't see 50 bucks worth that upload.. I would just get the premium package.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4908 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 599 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sun Sep 18 19:00:04 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 88X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.71 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 20.5 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-86D4LW0EU :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 381 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Sun Sep 18 18:55:49 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.48 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-W8M2LH0ES

There is no problem speeds are right on for 5000/384 guess my post kinda came across on the negative. The only problem I guess I have it with TWC them selfves. I think there prices are abit on the high side for what you get. Especially in my area... they kinda have a monopoly rockn and nobody really seems to care about it so nothing is done.

yes RR is complete garbage for the price and speeds. I agree... I'm am unfortunately stuck with it because that is the only thing offered in my area......Here are my speeds. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4950 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 604 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Sep 14 09:12:32 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 88X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.7 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 21.18 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MTQSP37Y8 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 381 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Wed Sep 14 09:13:17 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.03 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D309T1QK ]

this is more so because I'm curious. but wouldn't you be limited by how much your HD can read and write the data?

did somebody say remix.. have ta check it