CA3LE Posted August 30, 2006 CID Share Posted August 30, 2006 Here's mine :::::::::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::::::::: Download Connection is:: 9186 Kbps about 9.19 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1121 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 986 Kbps about 0.99 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 120 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/30 - 7:00am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7UHQDI58Y U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GK9Y8H5QE User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Run a dual-test and post your findings to this thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dn0 Posted August 30, 2006 CID Share Posted August 30, 2006 I could not quite pull the full 9mb/s this afternoon. But I am still happy with these numbers. :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 8334 Kbps about 8.33 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1017 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1053 Kbps about 1.05 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 129 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/30 - 3:23pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SE645YL1Z U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-S8PWYDTK4 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] I guess the third time's the charm (sorry about the extra b/w, CA3LE, lol) :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 9252 Kbps about 9.25 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1129 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1053 Kbps about 1.05 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 129 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/30 - 3:29pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-72LUJKCPD U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JM2KEDUWG User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted September 4, 2006 CID Share Posted September 4, 2006 we're getting dsl.. too bad its not cox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dn0 Posted September 10, 2006 CID Share Posted September 10, 2006 Blazing this morning: :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 9977 Kbps about 9.98 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1218 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1039 Kbps about 1.04 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 127 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/10 - 8:05am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IQS5DRVXW U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M1CRB0JA9 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] I believe this is my fastest test result so far at TMN, or anywhere for that matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSLFreak Posted September 10, 2006 CID Share Posted September 10, 2006 6/512 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 6033 Kbps about 6.03 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 736 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 525 Kbps about 0.53 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 64 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/10 - 12:43pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5ZHWLCQJX U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BFR6IQ9SY User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted September 10, 2006 CID Share Posted September 10, 2006 Danged you guys have nice speeds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted September 20, 2006 Author CID Share Posted September 20, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 9239 Kbps about 9.24 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1128 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1077 Kbps about 1.08 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 131 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/20 - 3:54am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-R7B3A6DL5 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QLABWR9FD User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] man... I can't wait to see my 12Mbps on October 1st!!! WOOT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted September 20, 2006 Author CID Share Posted September 20, 2006 Blazing this morning: ::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 9977 Kbps about 9.98 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1218 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1039 Kbps about 1.04 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 127 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/10 - 8:05am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IQS5DRVXW U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M1CRB0JA9 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 I believe this is my fastest test result so far at TMN, or anywhere for that matter. niiiice, ya almost hit 10mbps!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki123 Posted September 20, 2006 CID Share Posted September 20, 2006 I think the 12MB kicked here early (although this is in my school) and usages is a bit heavy so I coulnt hit the 12MB mark :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 11319 Kbps about 11.32 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1382 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/20 - 10:12am Bottom Line:: 197X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.74 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.8 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 135.08 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FUL60WE1C User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] upload doesnt seem to be working rigth now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki123 Posted September 21, 2006 CID Share Posted September 21, 2006 I tried a diferent mirror and is WAY faster :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 16136 Kbps about 16.14 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1970 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.dehekracing.com Test Time:: 2006/09/21 - 1:15pm Bottom Line:: 281X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.52 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 10.647 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 234.49 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XZH9G8WPF User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted September 21, 2006 CID Share Posted September 21, 2006 loki123 real nice speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted September 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted September 22, 2006 I tried a diferent mirror and is WAY faster ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 16136 Kbps about 16.14 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1970 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.dehekracing.com Test Time:: 2006/09/21 - 1:15pm Bottom Line:: 281X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.52 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 10.647 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 234.49 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XZH9G8WPF User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) yeah, some mirrors will get better results for some people... looks like you found the perfect one for you. It all has to do with how far you are from the servers...... this is why I offer choices, say thank you to all the people who donate those mirrors THANKS MIRROR DONATION GUYS! -D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h2haxor Posted October 2, 2006 CID Share Posted October 2, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 9252 Kbps about 9.25 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1129 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1040 Kbps about 1.04 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 127 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/01 - 9:12pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JWE5OTCGF U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Q72UXBLV8 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur1234 Posted October 21, 2006 CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 Here's my downstream and upstream stats :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 12010 Kbps about 12.01 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1466 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1117 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 136 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/20 - 10:07pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4HVMPSRGL U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VZJEP3D48 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.7-1.5 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Also, on speedtest.net What I get: I will be leave Cox for AT and T for gaming online but I may go back to cox again within 6 months to 1 year or so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h2haxor Posted October 21, 2006 CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 Why? i don't understand..... at&t is 6mbps/7XXkbps big drop on dl smal drop on up but ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur1234 Posted October 21, 2006 CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 Why? i don't understand..... at&t is 6Mbps/7XXKbps big drop on dl smal drop on up but ??? Well, that I know a truth about cable media system are share that's what I understand of cable system, on cable so my latency is so-so ping www.google.com -c 50 PING www.l.google.com (72.14.203.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=51.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=38.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=35.3 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=244 time=39.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=10 ttl=244 time=35.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=11 ttl=244 time=35.8 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=12 ttl=244 time=37.3 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=13 ttl=244 time=34.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=14 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=15 ttl=244 time=35.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=16 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=17 ttl=244 time=34.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=18 ttl=244 time=34.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=19 ttl=244 time=36.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=20 ttl=244 time=36.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=21 ttl=244 time=38.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=22 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=23 ttl=244 time=36.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=24 ttl=244 time=37.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=25 ttl=244 time=34.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=26 ttl=244 time=40.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=27 ttl=244 time=37.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=28 ttl=244 time=33.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=29 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=30 ttl=244 time=34.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=31 ttl=244 time=35.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=32 ttl=244 time=36.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=33 ttl=244 time=35.8 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=34 ttl=244 time=34.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=35 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=36 ttl=244 time=36.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=38 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=39 ttl=244 time=36.3 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=40 ttl=244 time=37.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=41 ttl=244 time=40.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=42 ttl=244 time=38.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=43 ttl=244 time=43.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=44 ttl=244 time=39.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=45 ttl=244 time=37.3 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=46 ttl=244 time=40.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=47 ttl=244 time=34.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=48 ttl=244 time=37.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=49 ttl=244 time=36.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=50 ttl=244 time=36.6 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 49 received, 2% packet loss, time 49033ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.454/36.956/51.017/2.772 ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur1234 Posted October 21, 2006 CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 Here is my adsl ping; that pinging to google.com is very nice... PING www.l.google.com (72.14.203.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=26.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=10 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=11 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=12 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=13 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=14 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=15 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=16 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=17 ttl=247 time=29.8 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=18 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=19 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=20 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=21 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=22 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=23 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=24 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=25 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=26 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=27 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=28 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=29 ttl=247 time=26.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=30 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=31 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=32 ttl=247 time=26.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=33 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=34 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=35 ttl=247 time=27.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=36 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=37 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=38 ttl=247 time=26.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=39 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=40 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=41 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=42 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=43 ttl=247 time=27.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=44 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=45 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=46 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=47 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=48 ttl=247 time=26.8 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=49 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=50 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49002ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.925/25.748/29.882/0.821 ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted October 21, 2006 Author CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 12475 Kbps about 12.48 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1523 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1122 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 137 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/21 - 2:22am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BJYR23MUZ U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3MKCPZ04X User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted October 21, 2006 Author CID Share Posted October 21, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dn0 Posted October 22, 2006 CID Share Posted October 22, 2006 Looking good, CA3LE. Here' mine: :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 12006 Kbps about 12.01 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1466 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1098 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 134 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/22 - 10:31am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-D9Y61BH28 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4RCVAG1L5 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bootyman Posted October 31, 2006 CID Share Posted October 31, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 13450 Kbps about 13.45 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1642 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1067 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 130 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/31 - 12:19am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GEWA6XRVB U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7VFYQJ1I0 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted October 31, 2006 Author CID Share Posted October 31, 2006 for some reason my 12mbps is running at only 9mbps - I think I need to call Cox, I think they've sent my modem the wrong config -- I was getting 12Mbps untill recently :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 9777 Kbps about 9.78 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1193 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1002 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 122 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/31 - 2:48am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1J8S6KITW U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H5S8QL62Y User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Binow Posted November 11, 2006 CID Share Posted November 11, 2006 They recently changed the speed for cox? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 13282 Kbps about 13.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1621 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/11/10 - 10:54pm Bottom Line:: 232X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.63 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 7.5 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 150.7 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P7DUSXY1K User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.0. Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 11, 2006 CID Share Posted November 11, 2006 You guys are lucky to get 12! I never do its 9-11 down and thats about it. Atleast on testmy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 11, 2006 CID Share Posted November 11, 2006 for some reason my 12Mbps is running at only 9Mbps - I think I need to call Cox, I think they've sent my modem the wrong config -- I was getting 12Mbps untill recently ::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 9777 Kbps about 9.78 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1193 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1002 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 122 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/31 - 2:48am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1J8S6KITW U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H5S8QL62Y User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) What tweaks do you use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.