fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 so that explains the high jitters. where is his location? we're getting a fair share of the storm too here in manila. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolbuster2007 Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 so that explains the high jitters. where is his location? we're getting a fair share of the storm too here in manila. i dont know his exact location. (off-topic) btw Firefox is faster than IE in terms of browsing/displaying web pages but in terms of speed during tests IE is faster by more than 200 kbps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 really? and i have always used firefox to take speed tests. well,here's what i got. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 236 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 29 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 5:10am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 35.31 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 20.093 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 96.72 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SUM9Y1RL8 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 i'll post my IE one after dinner. P.S. can't believe diagnosis says thats ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 here's my IE result. almost the same. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 226 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 28 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 5:35am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 36.57 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 20.953 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 53.68 % of your hosts average (241.45) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F1TVDMGUY User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) your right, firefox loads web pages faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 yeah, but that rssi is still low. best bet would be to adjust the direction of the canopy. @scriva - is your canopy facing a building? looks like your installers didn'ttaketimeto give you a proper ap connection. No, my canopy has a clear sight of the tower it's just a few blocks away from my house. i dont know his exact location. I live in cainta, rizal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 And why is it that when i'm changing the color code, the Session Status is always Syncing/Scanning/Registering and they don't Register unlike when i use color code 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 hmm, if it's just a few blocks away. why do you have low rssi? try to contact cs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 I want to be back in the 400+ club... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 maybe you are suffering from the storm. try to do this, save a copy of that test result, wait till the storm is over, then send a complaint to cs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 wtf!!! I think the slow speed was my fault!! See, this morning i downloaded some registry from jzlr...or something like that. Then I turned off the computer because i went out. Then, I came back and tested the speed and the slow speed was what I got. Then I remembered that I made a system restore point before doing those then... woooohooo at least I'm out of that crappy speed!! hahaha!! wooooo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 good for you then! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolbuster2007 Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 awesome! you got your life back! congratulations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Procopio- Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 Wow! awesome! Coolbuster and Frostbound.. got ym ids? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 17, 2007 CID Share Posted August 17, 2007 i'm not really into IMs, but check my previous posts for my yahoo account. although you'll rarely catch me offline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 hmm, just noticed, i made a mistake in my previous post. that's online, not offline. anyway,i have made the great leap. after struggling for 6 hours, i am now using xubuntu, and i think it's doing fine without cablenut and tcpoptimizer. i think i can crank some more speed out of it though. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 203 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 25 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/17 - 7:33pm Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 40.96 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 23.387 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 48.33 % of your hosts average (241.45) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GBKVLPU9J User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-feisty) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scriva Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 this is the speed i got when i turned TCPOptimizer off and used VanBuren's settings cablenut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xecutor Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 what the hell happened to my connection? is there something wrong with my cablenut settings? 3 days ago, im in 400+ club.. now.. i'll try to remove my cablenut settings and let's see what will happen.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xecutor Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 (after removing cablenut tweaks) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 maybe its with your base station. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xecutor Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 maybe its with your base station. i don't think so.. here's my AP Current entry index: 1 ********************************************* Index: 1 Frequency: 5735.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f1-73-09 Jitter: 3 RSSI: 715 Power Level: -75 Beacon Count: 7 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 3822 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1 Session Count: 1 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 FrameNumber: 591 SectorID: 1 Color Code: 115 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 17 Frequency: 5735 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3 ********************************************* Index: 2 Frequency: 5815.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f1-72-62 Jitter: 4 RSSI: 804 Power Level: -71 Beacon Count: 10 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1 Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 FrameNumber: 149 SectorID: 6 Color Code: 120 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 14 Frequency: 5815 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3 ********************************************* Index: 3 Frequency: 5835.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f2-17-e7 Jitter: 9 RSSI: 533 Power Level: -79 Beacon Count: 7 BRcvW: 1 DFS: 0 FEC: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet TxBER: 1 EBcast: 1 Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 FrameNumber: 74 SectorID: 6 Color Code: 252 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 16 Frequency: 5835 NumULHalfSlots: 18 NumDLHalfSlots: 55 NumULContSlots: 3 link capacity test Stats for LUID: 21 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1522 Downlink RATE: 5148672 bps Uplink RATE: 1259520 bps Downlink Efficiency: 93 Percent Max Downlink Index: 100 Actual Downlink Index: 93 Expected Frag Count: 20112 Actual Frag Count: 21526 Uplink Efficiency: 74 Percent Max Uplink Index: 100 Actual Uplink Index: 74 Expected Frag Count: 4920 Actual Frag Count: 6625 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 i mean the station itself, maybe there is something wrong with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xecutor Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 i mean the station itself, maybe there is something wrong with it. is there any other way to know if there's something wrong with my base station? i already tried two APs.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 none that i know of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xecutor Posted August 18, 2007 CID Share Posted August 18, 2007 index 1 and 2 are the best APs for me.. but i wondered why i get slow connection speed.. almost a dial-up connection.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.