mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 well , hi im new to this testmy.net and i just tested my cable for the speed. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3153 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 748 KB) Download Speed is:: 385 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 9:54 AM GMT Bottom Line:: 56X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.66 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=CINUQYT4A Im new and im not too sure if this is a good speed for .com.sg ( singapore ) does anyone think i should tweak it with the cablenut settings for better results ? will it slow me down if the settings is wrongly done ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrConstantin Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 Welcome. Tweaking can't hurt. What speed does your ISP advertise? Your speed should be around ninety percent and up, from what your company advertises. Anything lower, than some tweaking can be done to improve speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 hey thanks , my company ( maxonline ) advertise the connection as 6500/384 , which means im underacheiving ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrConstantin Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 Yea, your connection should be almost double what you're getting. Install the cablenut files https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=64 Aswell as these settings https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=101 Unzip the settings to C:ProgramCablenut after installing cablenut. Open up Cablenut Adjuster, and click Load Custom Setting File, in the file section at the top. browse to C:ProgramCablenutvanburens_cablenut_settings_version_2VanBurens cablenut settings Version 2WinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMSS1460 Double click on Cable & DSL 5000 768 Click save to registry, and restart your PC. Try the test again, and post results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1708 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 208 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 10:45 AM GMT Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.92 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=JOQ8Z0RKA it became worst . but well is something wrong ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrConstantin Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 Hmmm, I had done the samething about a week ago, and it doubled my speed. Probably going to have to wait for VanBuren to come take a look at this, he can help more. What system do you use, Windows Xp, 98?.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 hey mistkron and welcome to the forum we need to find the correct MSS value for you open cablenut adjuster, click delete cablenut tweaks and click save to registry and reboot, reboot your modem and router for 30 seconds too now run this test http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks copy result URL adress and paste it here so we can see it VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 this is the result url i've got http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:37e2f6d?service=cable&speed=6500&os=winXP&via=normal * thanks in advance for the help anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 331.12Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 237.55kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 293.52 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 4 packets retransmitted, 25 duplicate acks received, and 19 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [218.212.244.24] but Client says [192.168.0.11] - WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 114 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 5840 CongAvoid: 79 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 3 CountRTT: 85 CurCwnd: 14600 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 520 CurRwinRcvd: 17520 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 4380 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 294920 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 202 DupAcksIn: 25 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 3 MaxCwnd: 14600 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 910 MaxRTT: 460 MaxRwinRcvd: 17520 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 5840 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 490 MinRTT: 240 MinRwinRcvd: 17520 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 114 PktsOut: 202 PktsRetrans: 4 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 19 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 6 SampleRTT: 250 SmoothedRTT: 290 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10139157 SndLimTimeSender: 4511 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 294920 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 24950 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 699182 Duration: 10163407 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.40>2], (estimate > 2) [0.31>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0.23>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.33<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.01<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.01<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0.23<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.23>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.33<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.01<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [4.44=0], (speed < 5) [0.23<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.31>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0.23<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [4.4471092705321194E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0] bw = 0.31 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 293.52msec, and loss = 0.014851485379040241 The theoretical network limit is 0.31 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.68 Mbps Your receive buffer (17.0 KByte) limits the application to 0.45 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 0.37 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 you have some re transmissions so the route is probl not the best, but try this download this attached file, unzip it to C:ProgramCablenut open cablenut, in top left corner, click file, click load custom setting, browse to C:ProgramCablenut and dubble click on the file you unzipped now click save to registry and reboot, also reboot modem for 30 seconds make a new tweaktest and post result URL, and make a speedtest up and down good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 im looking at the post you helped mbrainerd with , youre good. im putting lots of hope with ya =D well ok will repost. reboot now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:10fc33?service=cable&speed=6500&os=winXP&via=normal * :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1600 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Download Speed is:: 195 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 11:59 AM GMT Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.25 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=2ZDC8LK0J :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 217 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is:: 27 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Jan 28th 2005 11:59 AM GMT Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB download in 37.93 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=25FM4ZNIH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 open cablenut, click delete cablenut tweaks and click save to registry and reboot now install win XP Sp 2 and after that load the file i posted before and make a new speed and tweaktest VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 is installing sp2 a must ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 is installing sp2 a must ? if your using my cable tweaks you will need XP2, however you can try my DSL tweaks aswell but it dosent give same boost to speed as the cable tweaks VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 how long will ya be online still , well ill have to get to my friend and borrow his sp2 to install. meanwhile ill try your adsl setting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 post again when you got it installed, ill be around VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 sp2 is horrible..why would you reccomend it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 hey, Isn't SP2 kinda necassary if you're using XP? Or do the mods it makes slow it down? Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 Everyone always dogs SP2... I use it and have no problems. It's great if you edit the preferences right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 xp2 is installed on xp if you use the windows update feature. It is not necassary unless you REALY care about security... It has tons of added features to help keep it "secure" but i personaly (along with millions of others,lol) do not like it one bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 28, 2005 CID Share Posted January 28, 2005 sp2 is horrible..why would you reccomend it.. Thats a myth, im using SP2 and pull 9.2 Mbps all the way from Sweden http://www.dslnuts.com/ quote" Microsoft has updated the TCP/IP to include AFDParameters from the IPv4 and wont read TcpWindowSize correctley in most analyzers, what this means is that the only tool that will tweak correctley at this point is the Cablenut program. As we get more information we willl post it. Here are the comments and link to Mnosteeles news thread. http://www.broadbandnuts.com/index.php?board=4;action=display;threadid=3126 If you have additional info on the changes feel free to add to that thread.. This is also effected in all flavors of Windows 2003 server. Quote: by Mnosteele Well it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 29, 2005 CID Share Posted January 29, 2005 I am also one that believes that SP2 causes problems for many ppl, there was a lot of press in the beginning about this but later it was written that the problems have been solved, Its funny to me that cable nut writes about the benefits of a "tweak" that ppl had been doing b4 SP2,... although I believe that all the problems with SP2 can be solved, for a person that is computer savvy,...... what about the general population that just wants to install something and not have to mess with it? Of course I don't think Sp2 causes irreparable damage to a system, I just don't see a great advantage either.As with so many issues with computers or any thing....... there are always at least two sides of the issue, each computer user must make a decision as to which way to go, I do know that there wasn't all this discussion when Sp1 came out. No matter which way a user goes I believe that if the proper steps are taken it is p[possible to do your Internet browsing with or without Sp1 or Sp2, the only 100% guaranteed security for any computer is to lock it up in a closet and your security can be assured. The only problem is you cant use it, as with any decision I make I listen to both sides and make my choice, and if after a time I make another decision to change again I do.Thats why I'm glad I still have the freedom of choice even if I'm wrong, so flip a coin, talk to your friends and family, talk to your computer "specialist" and then decide..... remember ya can always change your mind at a later date. I have found it interesting that Sp2 has a built in feature to turn it off when it encounters a problem running something.For now I'm still running Sp1 until I think its time to change... Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 29, 2005 well seems like this thread got pretty far , anyway VanBuren this are my results after sp2 is installed. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1685 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Download Speed is:: 206 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 16:20:26 UTC+0800 2005 Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.97 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-IDEUOX9C5 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 219 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is:: 27 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 16:20:46 UTC+0800 2005 Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 37.93 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-EJ6BXIHPO - http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:3f3995a?service=cable&speed=6500&os=winXP&via=normal - WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 418.42Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 357.17kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 281.09 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 3 packets retransmitted, 35 duplicate acks received, and 29 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [218.212.244.24] but Client says [192.168.0.11] - WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 167 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 4380 CongAvoid: 117 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 128 CurCwnd: 11680 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 530 CurRwinRcvd: 768000 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 5840 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 456980 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 313 DupAcksIn: 35 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 18980 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 930 MaxRTT: 430 MaxRwinRcvd: 768000 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 8760 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 490 MinRTT: 240 MinRwinRcvd: 48000 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 167 PktsOut: 313 PktsRetrans: 3 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 29 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 6 SampleRTT: 290 SmoothedRTT: 290 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10216982 SndLimTimeSender: 4547 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 456980 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 35980 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 4 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 245871 Duration: 10240585 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.30>2], (estimate > 2) [0.49>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0.35>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.41<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [6.38>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0.35<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.35>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.41<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [4.44=0], (speed < 5) [0.35<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.49>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0.35<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [4.448453846777718E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] bw = 0.49 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 281.09msec, and loss = 0.00638977624475956 The theoretical network limit is 0.49 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.80 Mbps Your receive buffer (750.0 KByte) limits the application to 20.84 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 0.51 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistkron Posted January 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 29, 2005 well the above results were from using the Cable & DSL 6000 768 setting you gave me. - i tried fiddling with another setting file which is the Cable & DSL 2048 1024 , and it seems like its pretty fine for my connection quite a bit too . but well Im still hearing from ya for new solutions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.