cobainfan69420 Posted March 16, 2006 CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 Your connection is: 11125 Kbps or 11.1 Mbps You Downloaded at: 1358 kB/s You are running: 199 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 0.75 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:64293156944 Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 8:38pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Test ID: C3O0FLRXQ (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 122.72 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) This was tested from a 5983 kB file and took 4.406 seconds to complete heres my info if you wont to know what i use its windows xp and i got verizon dsl its supposed to test at about 5 according to what the chart says if you wont to know how to make yours that fast my email is cobainfan69420@yahoo my id is the same for messenger this is easy to do to make yours this fast so write back to me everyone that sees this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MUff1N Posted March 16, 2006 CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 Uhmmm...What's your point? Yea, that's your speed...and??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted March 21, 2006 CID Share Posted March 21, 2006 my opinion and a fact- Tune up utilities 2k6 beats the heck out of cablenut anyday. Tune-up also fixed registry/program errors never had a problem. it also lets you customize boot screen, welcome, and desktop AND startup entries can be edited and don't forget that it will speed up both up and down.. I TRIED IT... b4 and after Thanks, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 22, 2006 CID Share Posted March 22, 2006 my opinion and a fact- Tune up utilities 2k6 beats the heck out of cablenut anyday. i checked that program out, and one thing is very clear in my point of view, the authors of that program dosent know jack S#!t about TCP tuning I pretended i had a 6 Mbps cable connection and loaded optimized settings with that program it changed my TcpWindowSize to 149200 but they forgot to set Windows scaling enabled Tcp1323Opts, that means my RWIN will be stuck at 65535 ( maximal unscaled RWIN ), the very same RWIN you will have by default if you run your NIC in 100Mbps with Windows XP It also changed MTU to 1492, we all know 95% of all cable connections has a 1500 byte MTU. Why reduce it? It will only result in slower speed, you will see this mainly on transfers over high delay routes. 1492 is a MTU for DSL over PPPoE and FIOS over PPPoE. take a good look at the screenshot, cablenut has so much more to tweak then the settings Tune up utilities 2k6 using Im sure its a great program, but not for internet tweaking. If you get better speed with that program then cablenut or TCP optimizer, its a fluke. Tcp Optimizer is a great tool in my point of view, if you dont want and need AFD tweaks. ive seen alot of tune up programs, when you take a deeper look at them you dont get very impressed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted March 22, 2006 CID Share Posted March 22, 2006 I agree VanBuren, Tcp Optimizer could be the choice of those just starting to tweak their settings, but CableNut Adjuster is by far the best and most full feature settings adjuster and optimizer around. . . .of course, you'll want to check out my XP Performance Tuning Guide to see what you can 'really' do to speed things up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m4st3r.y0d4 Posted May 30, 2006 CID Share Posted May 30, 2006 awsome info. here i wish i had came here a long tim ago...thnx for the support Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted May 30, 2006 CID Share Posted May 30, 2006 On my satelite connection I have tried both TCP Optimizer and Cablenut. The TCP Optimizer won out big time. Sometimes it just depends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthic Posted June 17, 2006 CID Share Posted June 17, 2006 hey finally wat s ur decision Tuneup utilities or cablenut??????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted June 17, 2006 CID Share Posted June 17, 2006 hey finally wat s ur decision Tuneup utilities or cablenut??????????? I would have to ask who you are talking to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karthic Posted June 17, 2006 CID Share Posted June 17, 2006 i m talking about the forum as a whole whatws the forum final judgement on the issue???????? CABLENUT R TUNEUPUTILITIES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 17, 2006 CID Share Posted June 17, 2006 i m talking about the forum as a whole whatws the forum final judgement on the issue???????? CABLENUT R TUNEUPUTILITIES cablenut is the best period its the most powerful, has most options and wont screw up registry... http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=3924.msg128708#msg128708 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted June 18, 2006 CID Share Posted June 18, 2006 Ive never tried tune up utilities because i thot it costed money, but anyway ive never had a problem with cablenut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharkyx Posted September 25, 2006 CID Share Posted September 25, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 664 Kbps about 0.66 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 81 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 951 Kbps about 0.95 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 116 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/25 - 1:43pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UVG1WCXR9 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UWY4P2ZOQ User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Like i installed cabled nut with settings 9 Cable & DSL 30000, and have unnormaly big upload (normally 20 kb/s ), and a low download....i would like to have a bigger download., how can i do that ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted September 25, 2006 CID Share Posted September 25, 2006 Welcome to the forum Sharkyx Like i installed cabled nut with settings 9Cable & DSL 30000, and have So you have 2 different settings on your cablenut? Cable &DSL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted September 26, 2006 CID Share Posted September 26, 2006 I have better luck with settings from versions 6&7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted September 26, 2006 CID Share Posted September 26, 2006 I actually had little luck with cablenut. Was much easier and ran faster with TCP Optimizer. Hands down. It might be because I am on satelite, who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharkyx Posted September 26, 2006 CID Share Posted September 26, 2006 Well my internet is by cable but i don't know how my ISP get's his internet, probably from satelit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharkyx Posted September 26, 2006 CID Share Posted September 26, 2006 Ok, i've installed cable nut with settings 7 Cable & DSL 1000 384, and like I now have 20 kb/s download and 250 kb/s UPLOAD!!! like wtf ? Your connection is: 1821 Kbps or 1.82 Mbps You Uploaded at: 222 kB/s You are running: 32 times faster than 56K and can Upload 1 megabyte in 4.61 second(s) Member Ident:Username:Sharkyx CompID:1991421791728 Test Time:: 2006/09/26 - 6:29am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 Test ID: 6IMEO8XBA (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 176.75 % faster than the average for host (89.251-videonet) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.45536 seconds to complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyy Posted December 6, 2006 CID Share Posted December 6, 2006 verry nice page alot info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 6, 2006 CID Share Posted December 6, 2006 tyy, Welcome to the forum. There is a lot of good information on this site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 tyy, Welcome to the forum. There is a lot of good information on this site. There sure is! Again welcome to TMN tyy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 Well triple the pleasure then. Welcome once more tyy Yeah a great site, and a great bunch of guys. Have you seen the exit door. I have been looking for it the last couple of years. Some chick named water keeps detouring me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M16 Posted December 23, 2006 CID Share Posted December 23, 2006 tommie sup has any one found something to speed Dway up ??? lol the 7000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 23, 2006 CID Share Posted December 23, 2006 Yeah, a bottle of acetylene strapped to the modem, and then light it. And for extra boost add oxygen. Man where you been hiding. Long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M16 Posted December 23, 2006 CID Share Posted December 23, 2006 lol tommie i been here and there yeah that's about it glad there's a roomer going around that dsl is coming my way woohoo Your connection is: 750 Kbps or 0.8 Mbps You downloaded at: 92 kB/s You are running: 13 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 11.13 second(s) Member Ident:Username:M16 CompID:615722117956 Test Time:: 2006/12/22 - 6:21pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) Test ID: ZK90D756M (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 72.18 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 32.688 seconds to complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.