tommie gorman

After looking that one up, I am going to assume you mean HDTV?

Try this test, and clean out your temp files before clicking on it. Top of browser*Tools*internet Options*Delete Files including Offline Content*OK*OK*Now test. http://www.testmy.net/dl-579 Are you using a router, if so try directly to the modem. Also what type of connection are you using? Cable*Satelite*DSL*ISDN*Wireless* etc...

Sometimes I think water or tdawnaz needs to slap you, you silly brit. You know our damned subtitle machine is broke. Have you got a loaner we could use?

My sig strength is 57 right now and normal for mine. Someday I will get that repointed. It could be as high as 90+. But speeds should be the same pretty much. Yes that (IA8 is your satelite, transponder). I could not find any isolation info, you might clue me in on that one.

But dlewis, it looked so nice, and felt so good. I would personally not have AOL anywhere near my computer.

Paying for pro just for speeds, is a waste of $$. Just Optimize for free.

Except ISP connection problems.

I am with you tdawnaz, they either need to provide a dictionary for their terminology. Or speak American English.

Download Connection is:: 264 Kbps about 0.26 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Your connection is: 6389 Kbps or 6.39 Mbps Interesting, and they were like 2 hours apart. So are you using the smart test? Try this and clear yourtemp files before clicking the link, asit takes you directly to the test. http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=5983&st=st You might also try it with out the router, unless it is necesary for your ISP.

Just a test, just a simple test. As usual. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.81 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 221 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/16 - 9:47pm Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.63 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.531 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 74.3 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6GY9ZW013 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Not bad.

Wow, that is some list! I don't think I read whether or not you are using a wireless router??

So call Rodgers, at least they will bother to come out for stolen bandwidth, and who knows, maybe they will find something out. Talk is cheap, call!

Thanks CA3LE, it gave me a chance to do a thorough cleaning. But now it is all quite like. HELLO, hello, are the three bears still in here.

Well that pretty much fixes just about anything Merch, reformatting.

Spring flues are no joke either. Any temp change flue is a big bad one for me. I would take sniffles anyday.

It looks nice to me Daiquirii, beats the heck out of what I have. Be fun to play on. Take care of that cold there, before it gets bad.

Well now, is everybody done taking their disks out in public, to play, fondle, and lick them yet? I hope so, like EWO said "you may get run over by a car", had a dog do that one time, she was a damned good dog before that!

What speed did you set it at? The optimizer, what speed did you set the guage at on page one? By the way, it is clean, right? Virus' and such?

What did you set the optimizer at jeffwalker9999 ?

Maybe he promises not to use them all at once!

Wow, that is a slow 4000 speed there Deven.

Actually it appears only 2 real scores here since it is: "Direcway is pretty fast tonight." :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1735 Kbps about 1.74 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 212 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/14 - 10:13pm Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.83 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.125 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 67.79 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O7JUSXHMY User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] At least since April 9th.

Welcome to the forum CtBruda A little cablenut and Van Buren always goes a long ways.

It would run, it just would not use the extra ram. I had a ram manager or something like that, I never fell below 1350 usable ram out of 2000. It did not hurt anything. Just useless.

Low maintenance, no monthly fees, and always working.