-
Posts
10,147 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
561 -
Speed Test
My Results
Everything posted by CA3LE
-
Cool.. right on the money I had an accuracy update that I made a while back... I have like 4 million versions of all my scripts on like 20 different machines, when I made my last minor update I uploaded the wrong file to my home server... litterally if I had version numbers for my scripts the upload test would be like version 15.233B and the download test would be version 45.887G haha... it is crazy how many updates I have made over the years -- being a perfectionist can make you crazy
-
it's just the way that the pages are handled .. Netscape in some cases offers less overhead. I personally would stick with IE though... but just use what you are comfortable with Microsoft must be doing something right... only 2% of my visitors are using Netscape now, down from 30% between 1999-2002 I used to use Netscape (mozilla) myself --- but IE has been kickin' Mozilla's butt the past few years
-
it's just the way that the pages are handled .. Netscape in some cases offers less overhead. I personally would stick with IE though... but just use what you are comfortable with Microsoft must be doing something right... only 2% of my visitors are using Netscape now, down from 30% between 1999-2002 I used to use Netscape (mozilla) myself --- but IE has been kickin' Mozilla's butt the past few years
-
try to retest... I just noticed that I had uploaded an old version of the upload test to my server on accident, your results should sit right where you'd expect now here are mine :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 259 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is: 32 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 5 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 32 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=80LP9YK9G results I just got from pc pitstop "Upload Speed 258 Kb/s" Let me know what ya get now
-
try to retest... I just noticed that I had uploaded an old version of the upload test to my server on accident, your results should sit right where you'd expect now here are mine :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 259 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is: 32 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 5 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 32 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=80LP9YK9G results I just got from pc pitstop "Upload Speed 258 Kb/s" Let me know what ya get now
-
What is your advertised upload speed with your provider?
-
What is your advertised upload speed with your provider?
-
Well... you can see my October 2003 benchmark of that with this post http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?p=178&highlight=mozilla#177'>http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?p=178&highlight=mozilla#177 I am a bit faster myself now... and now retesting I am seeing the oposite effect Internet Explorer 6.0.2800.1106.xpsp2.030422.1633 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3845 Kbps about 3.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 469 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 69 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.18 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=KNKLOGVJC Mozilla Fireball 0.6.1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3308 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 404 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.53 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=6M1GXOXQJ I dunno man... I prefer Internet Explorer, it just kicks ass, and is stable
-
Well... you can see my October 2003 benchmark of that with this post http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?p=178&highlight=mozilla#177'>http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?p=178&highlight=mozilla#177 I am a bit faster myself now... and now retesting I am seeing the oposite effect Internet Explorer 6.0.2800.1106.xpsp2.030422.1633 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3845 Kbps about 3.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 469 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 69 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.18 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=KNKLOGVJC Mozilla Fireball 0.6.1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3308 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 404 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.53 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=6M1GXOXQJ I dunno man... I prefer Internet Explorer, it just kicks ass, and is stable
-
Optical Camouflage - Invisible man cloaked - WHAT! FOR REAL!
CA3LE replied to CA3LE's topic in General Discussion
-
Yea I have three of those Itanium processors in my computer right now... they aren't that fast... BAH HA HA HA HA --- in my dreams
-
Yea... ya do have another test taken at 10460 Kbps today ... I dunno though your past scores are all over the place, test a few more times for me I am starting to trust you on this... but why is it that one day you have 4 Mbps then the next you are getting an average of 12 Mbps??? On RoadRunner?? ?? ? AHHH By the way I deleted you other two posts, in the future please include posts of the same subject in one post
-
awesome... welcome to the forums, hope to see a lot of posts out of you ~ and of course hope you tell your friends about the site. What was your speed before, 1.5 Mbps?
-
Optical Camouflage - Invisible man cloaked - WHAT! FOR REAL!
CA3LE replied to CA3LE's topic in General Discussion
damn terrorists -
Yea those things are gay... I wish Google would stop showing those ads on my site... if you see those ads, post the url that is under the ad in this post... so I can have those filtered out, I have been meaning to do that I mean I get paid for those clicks and all... but I don't want my visitors being exposed to that crap! They can devistate a system... and in the end cost your system and connection speed LOSS not GAIN --- though some of the programs that empower cacheing technology can be great for dial-up users, they are not at all good for users with any sort of broadband --- I wouldn't even suggest it for someone that was on a mild 256 Kbps connection. Years ago, before this site was TestMy.net (if anyone can name any of my previous domain names this site was connected with you will make me blush) I used to advertise for an accelerator program... I quickly pulled the ads after I tried it myself and found out what a crock it was...... I ended up having to format my computer to get everything back to stable.
-
Optical Camouflage - Invisible man cloaked - WHAT! FOR REAL!
CA3LE replied to CA3LE's topic in General Discussion
If you look at how it works ( http://projects.star.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp:/projects/MEDIA/xv/Brochure-e.pdf ) you will see that the only practical use in the military would be like.... hiding tanks and munitions --- a soldier on the move could not use it -
My connection is now primed..... Comcast workplace
CA3LE replied to bdodom's topic in Show off your speed
That is completely normal for cable... sad but true... maybe one day we can see the upload bar raised a bunch ~~ they have done it in the past... up from 128 Kbps -
that is pretty nice almost symetric connection... now if I could only get a symetric connection with my download speed :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3808 Kbps about 3.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 465 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 68 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.2 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=YJTG291PM
-
Optical Camouflage - Invisible man cloaked - WHAT! FOR REAL!
CA3LE replied to CA3LE's topic in General Discussion
-
Optical Camouflage - Invisible man cloaked - WHAT! FOR REAL!
CA3LE replied to CA3LE's topic in General Discussion
hell yea