CA3LE

oh nothin' much... welcome

oh nothin' much... welcome

they need to hurry up and put that in my backyard ~ I'd pay twice that price... or more for something of that grade.

they need to hurry up and put that in my backyard ~ I'd pay twice that price... or more for something of that grade.

The ends justify the means ~~ I had problems myself... my cpu was running cool at 105*F (40*C) idle --- but my system temp was running way hot at 124*F (50*C) - I got a new one, but I had to pick it up at another store which was 40 miles away because the other store was out of stock. Got it back and put 'er all back together and the system temp was running at 105*F (40*C) -- pretty good ~ but I still put another fan inside the case pointing at the board and now the system temp is down to 98*F (37*C) -- CPU is idle at 104* now also --- now I am happy with my temps ~~ time to overclock and screw it all up

That is pretty pimp man ~~~ looks quite a bit like the new comp I built ceptI have UV lights and reactive round cables--- Damn it, I should have got the athlon 64 :-/ -- oh well I still got 15000 on Mad Onion 2001SE

Western Digital --- hehe so now I have 160GB + 120GB --- and what's funny is in my old case I found a 60GB Western Digital... I forgot about it and had it disconnected ~~ so I'm going to throw that in my XBOX

Well I just went ahead and built a new box today. AMD Athlon XP Barton 3000+ - DFI Lan Party board new 160 GB SATA HD --- few more things --- I will get pic for ya fools

ah yes numion, that is pretty similar... but theirs request multiple pages at once. Grrrr, I fried my main computer last night... I got up this morning and it was like "no man... I don't think so" ~~ I'm not even going to troubleshoot it I am just going to go get a new case/motherboard/CPU today -- I've been wanting to for a while anyway... ehhh, I got a very good life out of that mobo/cpu/case ~~ got it all in early 2002 I think, and the shit is still faster to the day than most of my friends

Maximum connections should not matter because only one page is being requested at once... I am may make a test that requests all the pagesat once I haven't decided yet. The most important thing that come into consideration is connection speed in conjunction with CPU speed and overall computer & browser health. Those are all factors on the regular download test but not nearly as much as with this test. This basically will tell you how fast you can surf the internet (not just download a file off the internet) and I don't think anyone has made a test like it... please correct me if I'm wrong.

ehhh... I couldn't wait.. I added the star rating to the cut n paste :::.. Page Load Stats ..::: Subjective Rating:: 4 1/2 out of 5 stars Load Speed:: 1782 Kbps or 217 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: loaded 10 100KB pages in 4.437 seconds Still thinking if I should do that to the other tests... feedback guys?

The thing is that I really don't know how to scale this test... it's completely new and that's why it's in beta stage. Here is what I get :::.. Page Load Stats ..::: Load Speed:: 1063 Kbps or 130 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: loaded 10 50KB pages in 3.719 seconds :::.. Page Load Stats ..::: Load Speed:: 1782 Kbps or 217 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: loaded 10 100KB pages in 4.437 seconds All the pages load at the same speed for me, I think I got the star rating about right... and the rating adjusts different for each test size, so your star rating should be about the same reguardless of what test you use --- for both of the tests I posted... I got 4 1/2 stars -- I think tomorrow I will add in the cut n paste the star rating Everyone please give your feedback on this new tool....

well... look at the finished product http://bit-tech.net/article/135/ --- maaaaaan

I am not going to hold my breath for those games again --- every time I do I get let down and the game release gets pushed out AGAIN!

I used AVG for the longest time... but the Client Security isn't just antivirus -- click the link I supplied and see, it's one kick ass program. I won't use any toolbars myself... but I would trust the Google toolbar, Google is good peeps.

Okay... I am kinda starting to like Foxfire now... still need some time. I do like the customization I just did, very cool in that aspect... got it to run a bit faster too :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3903 Kbps about 3.9 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 476 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 70 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.15 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=QHB6HFDO5

Well I never see any security problems because I run Symantec Client Security... it has made my internet browsing much more enjoyable and basically blocks out everything but the real content of the pages I am requesing... it's very smart too. I have ran it for about 2 months now and had only a couple of spyware/adware bugs reported from Adaware since ~~ I see almost NO advertisments anymore, and if an ad does get through... and bugs me, I can add them to my library and never have to see it again ~ You can see more here >> http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?ProductID=154 --- it's a killer program

Yea those guys always fell for that shit... they were always ready for action. We would make a call and watch the guy in his truck peelout and do a 180 trying to 'get to the scene of the crime' --- all while we were laughing our asses off in our car

Okay after the optimizer the testing progress bar seem erratic ... and first scores lower :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3188 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 389 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 57 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.63 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=GAHDBM301 then scores higher :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3501 Kbps about 3.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 427 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 63 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.4 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=C9MN1SEAQ then score FAR lower :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2752 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 336 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 49 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.05 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=G3PG6WSNL then score higher :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3734 Kbps about 3.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 456 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 67 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.25 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=MY37FKPB5 But still does not compete with my consistant Internet Explorer... so far.. I will keep checking it out

Okay I am going to try that optimizer... so far IE is by far winning the speed test IE: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3883 Kbps about 3.9 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 474 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 69 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.16 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=J25JT7K6K Mozilla FoxFire :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3381 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 413 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 60 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.48 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=Q0FC9O9P4

ima five firefox a little run... let ya know what I feel about it