Jump to content

sst45jeff

Members
  • Posts

    92
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by sst45jeff

  1. crazy, goes to show you what staring at you computor screen can do to you !!!!!!!!!!!
  2. I dont think the modem cares how many peers are connected. It is just all data to the modem. Sounds like a setup problem with the bittorrent program or you are using so much of your bandwidth that there is nothing left for the upload side to ask for request for more packets. The rule of thumb is download at only 80% of your advertised speed.
  3. You are right I did compress everything before I found out it was a bad idea. I just checked under the folders properties tab, advanced and the compress folder is checked. I confirmed the few black text folders I have are not compressed. Thanks now i know why and what can be done.
  4. the font color is greyed out under the icon item so i cant change it. any ideas how to activate it ?
  5. Anybody know how to change the color of the text that shows the name to the right of my folders in XP. I installed a internet program from Adobe to convert files to pdf on there website and it changed the color of the text that names all my folders to blue from black and i don't like it. Anybody else experience this or know where the setting is to change the folder text color ?
  6. What do you have to do to get 90% of wired speed. I have a Belkin Pre n wireless router and I can hardly get over 1/10th of my wired speed with it on the other computor.
  7. only time i have trouble with mine is when i get snow on the dish. brush it off and all is good.
  8. glad to hear you found it. That is a tough one. why did the manufacture not inform you of this?
  9. I read that also but it is for an ambit modem and I cant find how to do it with the mototrola SB5100
  10. Yes I agree that the time of day and the amount of traffic can make a diffrence. I see though where others on Comcast with the same download tier are getting speeds right up to there caps and some over during the peak internet times of the day. I am just trying to maximize my conection and cant understand why I cant even get close. The timing out on the first hop concerns me and the mismatch condition was concerning me. (dont no if this is an actual problem at this point though.)
  11. How do you force the half duplex setting in the modem. I found where it shows that it is 100 full duplex but not how to change it.
  12. I had the same alarm with my old ambit modem and i was told then the same thing by somebody else. When I was getting the alarm with the new modem and the test was not good I was getting concerned.
  13. This is what i am getting right now with the NIC auto detecting and it is about as good as it gets and never very often usually alot slower more like 5Mbps. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7728 Kbps about 7.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 943 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 15:03:05 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 138X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.09 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 62.28 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BM5KX0G3I
  14. I understand what they are saying but it kills my speed when I set the NIC to half duplex 10 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3010 Kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 367 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 14:46:44 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 54X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.79 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 63.2 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YGLI90UCK
  15. Yes i have set my Nic to auto and that is where i have it at present. I also tried manualy switcing it to Full made no diffrence and i tried manualy switching it to Half duplex no diffrence.
  16. this file stalls out bad like some of the others i have tried. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3478 Kbps about 3.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 425 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 14:21:49 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 62X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.41 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 73.02 % of your hosts average (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RBJIW5CLM
  17. This file (OOL 10000 1000.ccs from the cablenut files - MSS1460 XP cable files )seems to work the best as far as posting the highest speeds and not having the stalling when testing. Still not close to the cap though. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6819 Kbps about 6.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 832 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 13:58:43 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 122X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.23 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 43.17 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FNUBRPZ2Q
  18. Please have a look and see if you can tell me what might be going on. I get some better test, but not very often and never close to my cap. Thanks. Windows Xp, SP2 installed with patch Cablenut installed with Van Buren file version 8, Cable & DSL 10000.ccs Instaled thes tweaks Faster page loading Disable DNS Caching Increase Buffer All registry tweaks by Rom Dos for XP Mcafee Firewall and anti virus turned off. Ran Spybot and Adware regularly. Used Ccleaner Connected through NIC. Set it to 100mb full duplex for Cable Updated NIC driver to latest driver. Uninastalled Lan protocols not used. Made sure nothing is checked (LAN settings button) Cleared cookies, temp. files and caches. Power cycled modem. New motorolaSB5100 modem. No router installed during test. Comcast 8800/1000 Test with Anti virus off. Always stalls at about 30% & 60% loaded. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3940 Kbps about 3.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 481 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 10:42:19 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 70X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.13 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 82.74 % of your hosts average (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PMG4YWB13 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 983 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 120 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 10:28:57 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 8.53 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 184.1 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AWHIPTF3S Test with Anti virus on. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2228 Kbps about 2.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 272 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Wed Feb 8 10:43:32 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 40X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3.76 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 46.79 % of your hosts average (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XU69SN510 TCP options string = 020405b40103030301010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 513920 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 20556.8 Kbps (2569.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 8222.72 Kbps (1027.84 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 53 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00100000 (32) Precedence (priority) = 001 (priority) Delay = 0 (normal delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = CS1 001000 ( - class 1 (RFC 2474). Similar forwarding behavior to the ToS Precedence field. click START to re-test Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 45 seconds Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.01Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 7.99Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition exists: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplex click START to re-testrunning OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplexD ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplexD Web100 reports the Round trip time = 44.54 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 220 packets retransmitted, 237 duplicate acks received, and 183 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 3 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.75 seconds (7.5%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. (what is this?) Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End The current date is: Wed 02/08/2006 The current time is: 9:40:02.04 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 70ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 12 ms 7 ms 9 ms 68.86.99.101 3 8 ms 9 ms 26 ms 68.86.96.13 4 15 ms 10 ms 11 ms 68.86.96.10 5 10 ms 9 ms 28 ms 12.117.243.13 6 69 ms 64 ms 85 ms 12.122.81.6 7 68 ms 68 ms 69 ms tbr2-cl10.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.12.113] 8 65 ms 64 ms 83 ms tbr1-cl30.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.9.137] 9 70 ms 75 ms 68 ms tbr1-cl3.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.10.26] 10 66 ms 67 ms 67 ms tbr1-cl20.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.49] 11 68 ms 68 ms 67 ms 12.122.82.37 12 66 ms 91 ms 67 ms 12.119.136.14 13 65 ms 72 ms 69 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 14 65 ms 225 ms 65 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 15 65 ms 64 ms 71 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 16 63 ms 65 ms 64 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete.
  19. How is it for slowing your speed down? I am having problems with Mcaffe slowing my speed down.
×
×
  • Create New...