AgentGOD

I'm on the 6 Mbps/384 Kbps tier. Still not 12 Mbps yet...

Hey, those speeds are just like mine

No it doesn't... the FX-57 has architectural differences, and it also has 1 MB L2 cache, whereas the Venice core has only 512 KB. Benchmark Comparision, my 3000+ @ 2.81 GHz (venice), and FX-57 @ 2.81 GHz (stock) FX-57: Mine:

The 3000+ S939 stock speed is 1.8 GHz.

Okay, and theres a particular reason why I threw in the AMD64 series of Athlon logos on it Heres why... OC Validation: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=63847 Sorry about my bad overclock... My venice batch sucks... The point is... ever since I dumped my Pentium 4, i've become an AMD fan.

Microsoft did NOT make the wallpaper, I did

What do you guys think? Oh, and I enhanced the wallpaper myself That isn't even the original wallpaper from Royale And yes, I'm running XP x64.

Simple, buy an AMD Semperon 3100+ and upgrade from your existing Pentium 4, and Overclock the sh*t out of it.

My Machine is ready to take on Vista... I've installed Beta 2, and it runs smoothly. The visual styles are great (transparent!!!!). I don't know about you guys, but 1 GB of RAM will become the "Recommended", instead of 512 MB. And 2 GB will be "gamers' choice".

It is indeed, that high.

My 10 Mbps speed looks perminant. I had it for months, not a temporary trial. I've got Comcast HSI.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10299 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1257 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Jan 06 2006 21:17:44 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 184X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 117.92 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OJZCIFD0K :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 381 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Fri Jan 06 2006 21:20:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 8.24 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ROC7PNF83 Welcome to BBR! Run more tests! see forums 2006-01-06 23:19:51 EST: 10251 / 363 Your download speed : 10251 kbps or 1281.4 KB/sec. Your upload speed : 363 kbps or 45.4 KB/sec. My scores from " 6 Mbps/384 Kbps", which apparently, is 10 Mbps/384 Kbps.

Lawl. Check this out. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10299 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1257 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Jan 06 2006 21:17:44 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 184X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 117.92 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OJZCIFD0K :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 381 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Fri Jan 06 2006 21:20:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 8.24 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ROC7PNF83 Merry Christmas, and a happy new year, to all. By the way, Nice 100 Mbps connection P.S.: My upload speed sucks.

Don't listen to him, he's just being biased. BFG sucks at overclocking. Me and my friend's 6800 GT's never got past 1050 MHz on the memory without heavy artifacting, and others with other manufacturers, however, got to 415/1100 with no problems at all. So i'd say stick with the facts, instead of listening to some biased kid. eVGA, XFX, Gainward, MSI are examples of good manufacturers. Gainward's warranty is very wide, so even if you break your card by overclocking, you can still RMA it, and they'd send you a new one free with no charge. But Gainward is only available in Europe. I'm currently using a GeForce 7800 GTX from MSI, and I have it at 526/1440 when using a large fan, and 519/1420 for regular usage and gaming.

Really nice... My cable is a SNAIL compared to that... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10249 Kbps about 10.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1251 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Dec 12 2005 15:44:18 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 183X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.82 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 119 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7PH96L4M0 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 379 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 46 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Dec 12 2005 15:46:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.26 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 4.7 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ALJ56MRQ9

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10299 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1257 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Nov 30 2005 15:18:20 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 184X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 129.99 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F1K98Z4UG

Fiber Optics

Meh, thats the best you can get with your line.

Hah, real nice. I can't even get that high. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9704 Kbps about 9.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1185 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Nov 28 2005 00:01:43 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 173X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.86 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 27.92 % faster than the average for host (73.225) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SFLVODJB0 Meh.

Zomgs He's gettin the same speeds as me! 10 Mbps/384 Kbps I concur Heh in my oppinion, I think comcast is conjuring up something that goes up against FiOS.

Hey CA3LE, looks like you do c++ char user[5]; user = "CA3LE" if(user != "CA3LE" && leetlevel < 10) { printf("YOU'RE SO UN1337!!1!1!!!"); slap(user); } else cout << "1337ness Detected!" << endl;

No, you weren't listening. It's already out of production. The last production line was the GeForce 6 series, and now the cards of the 6 series (AGP ones) are already out of production. That means, once they all sell, they're gone.

You do realize that AGP cards are officially out of production as of now, right?

I'm assuming that he's on the 8 Mbps/768 Kbps tier. Do a speed test for Upload please. Heres mine (10 Mbps/384 Kbps tier): :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9977 Kbps about 10 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1218 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sun Nov 27 2005 14:56:26 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 178X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.84 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 122.95 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-50VACZ781 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 372 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Sun Nov 27 2005 14:57:09 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 7.83 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TNS0YLOCX

LMFAO ROFL. The 6200 is the WORST deal you can get. Consider THESE if you think the 6200 is so 'great': http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814133143 - PNY GeForce FX 5700 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814133129 - PNY GeForce 6600 GT - for $99 (PCI-Express) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814145107 - CHAINTECH GeForce 6600 GT - for $149 (AGP) Admit it. AGP is extinct. So be it. One thing to add on: Just because the card has 256 MB of RAM, you must consider that the SPEED of the RAM AND/OR the GPU core *may* be slower. Ex: a GeForce 6600NU has 256 MB of RAM (usually), BUT it has DDR1 RAM. A GeFroce 6600 GT uses GDDR3 RAM, even though it has LESS (128 MB). I would still go with the GDDR3 one, just because its faster.