mudmanc4

They say dont take LSD but looks like this guy didn't listen :2funny:

Welcome to the forum rw, care to enlighten some of us on the connection between the euro, and the war in Iraq? It sounds as if you may have something more to say about it

Be careful

You guy's gotta see this , it's worth it. Tell me how he does it http://www.glumbert.com/media/cyril

Hope everyone had a good day today. Nothin like a good kielbasa , man, the stuff comes back for a day or so lol Good for yous that you don't have smella - puter

I'll go w/ you on this one.Gothic 3 involves streaming from the HDD, and raid0 ,made a considerable difference. Just back up your saves each day, : ) Just for the experience, as we speak , I'm installing a raid 0 on a suse 10.2 box. If for nothing else , I have learned to partition two drives, in a raid array , using a hardware controller , and the suse software raid

Wish I could help, but I do not meet your requirements. The closest I come is internet phone, sorry .

The "beep " you speak of , sounds to me like it may be a memory stick issue. Possibly a bad dimm, or installed incorrectly? reset the bios, "by jumper or remove the battery", and check your memory. Like .s1 said

Raid can be good in certain applications, but in the long run, to get redundancy it gets rather complicated. for instance. In RAID Level 0, the data is striped across drives without any parity bits for error checking. This does not provide any capability for recovery but does yield maximum transfer rates. RAID Level 1 is disk mirroring. Data is written to multiple disks simultaneously. This provides complete redundancy, but the trade-off is the loss of disk space for the complete second copy. RAID Level 3 stripes data one byte at a time across multiple drives, with parity stored on an extra drive. The speed is good; but for large files, a small data stripe size slows the transfer. RAID Level 5 stripes sectors of data across the multiple drives with the parity interleaved. The flexibility of RAID 5 is the key to optimizing for a specific application.

Bytes Source Seq Time Units 64 72.14.207.99 1 90.2 ms 64 72.14.207.99 2 103 ms 64 72.14.207.99 3 77.2 ms 64 72.14.207.99 4 91.3 ms 64 72.14.207.99 5 76.4 ms 64 72.14.207.99 6 98.0 ms 64 72.14.207.99 7 88.9 ms 64 72.14.207.99 8 69.5 ms 64 72.14.207.99 9 101 ms 64 72.14.207.99 10 72.5 ms Time minimum: 69.50 ms Time average: 87.11 ms Time maximum: 103.00 ms Packets transmitted: 10 Packets received: 10 Packet loss: 0% Hop Hostname IP Time 1 Time 2 1 cm-76-58-64-1.woh.res.rr.com 76.58.64.1 14.006 13.694 2 68.168.245.133 68.168.245.133 9.621 10.381 3 68.170.223.89 68.170.223.89 15.637 13.793 4 68.170.127.9 68.170.127.9 14.953 14.335 5 66.109.14.101 66.109.14.101 17.157 17.391 6 66.109.0.1 66.109.0.1 54.993 55.519 7 66.109.0.209 66.109.0.209 66.784 67.033 8 66.109.3.14 66.109.3.14 57.319 50.988 9 66.109.11.94 66.109.11.94 53.786 47.988 10 72.14.232.53 72.14.232.53 42.105 37.468 11 72.14.232.74 72.14.232.74 46.718 53.416 12 py-in-f99.google.com 64.233.167.99 37.933 38.122

I can always count on Testmy.net for my REAL bandwidth speeds. I may not like the outcome at times,because I realize I should be getting more from my ISP than what I see, But I trust TMN's calculations. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 4797 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 586 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/03/29 - 4:36am Bottom Line:: 84X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.75 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 10.217 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 2.04 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CT0RQGFPS User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.2-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 478 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 58 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/03/29 - 4:40am Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 17.66 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 17.366 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 14.9 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MBEV6Y04H User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.2-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!]

I have been a bit slow on the tests as well, but I don't think it's the site, it's everywhere for me. It usually clears up . Just probably network traffic. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 3224 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 394 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2007/03/28 - 6:45pm Bottom Line:: 56X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.6 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 53.286 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 68.58 % of your hosts average (rr.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5BYRJUK3W User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.2-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 478 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 58 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2007/03/28 - 6:50pm Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 17.66 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 51.294 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 14.9 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K0N78X2HL User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20061023 SUSE/2.0.0.2-1.1 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!]

I have a printer that no matter what I do, it does that, prints in black great though. I know this is a dumb question, but , are you sure that your cartridge is full?. Some of them will report that incorrectly, and don't have ink in them, from the factory. Did you try another color cartridge? Like D said lol

Damn dude, thats awesome ! I have had techs out , off the top of my head at least 15 or more times in three years ( I have all records) , but they never gave me that , you done good

Your hardware firewall. And what browser are you using?

:2funny: :2funny: Shiela, amy, andrea, pam, shelly, kendra, if you need anymore help, Aggr3 , LMK, :2funny: :2funny: Le_ Can you not accomplish this w/ remote assistance, in windows? Or , if your really good, I believe XP still ships w/ raw sockets , theres supposed to be a way to get in that way lol

Is that the package you are paying for? the higher sppeds?

Your connection is: 2641 Kbps or 2.6 Mbps You downloaded at: 322 kB/s You are running: 46 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 3.18 second(s) Member Ident:Username:mudmanc4 CompID:69869595574 Test Time:: 2007/03/18 - 4:02pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060311 Epiphany/1.8.5 Test ID: 26CUGSM43 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 56.07 % of your hosts average (rr.com) This was tested from a 1075 kB file and took 3.334 seconds to complete good here, but Epiphany is a bit slow

works good on Linux / FF no problems

EEEEEkkk, just getting worse all the time . :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 789 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 96 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2007/03/18 - 8:45am Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.67 sec Tested from a 748 kB file and took 7.77 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 16.74 % of your hosts average (rr.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CERI98S65 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.10-0.2 Firefox/1.5.0.10 [!]

I would ask you if you had access to an ohm meter, but given your answer, I would say not. I will get ahold of some arctic silver, and test it myself, unless someone here already knows the answer

I have heard, that arctic silver is conductive, I dont know this for a fact, but I would be weary if it were. It would only take a small amount to cause an issue. I strictly use the white myself, and have no issues w/ heat. BTW, maybe one of you w/ some silver, could take a resistance / ohm reading for the rest of us. To find continuity or not .

Happy B-day dude might as well be a bit slower than her lol but quicker than the rest

lol good one lmfao