dn0 Posted February 12, 2007 CID Share Posted February 12, 2007 Looking good, unitychild... Here's a test result from NE for a comparison. I am currently out in the sticks a bit. :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 1224 Kbps about 1.22 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 149 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 138 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 17 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/02/12 - 9:50am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-J3L8DTK1Z U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TYHVE1BM3 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostmaster Posted February 12, 2007 CID Share Posted February 12, 2007 Would you have any knowledge about VOIP working in the router situation and the EVDO? I don't see why it shouldn't but I also don't see the need as you would have cell phone service along with the EVDO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unitychild Posted February 12, 2007 CID Share Posted February 12, 2007 upload speeds from work(Weston, MO) :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 194 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 24 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/02/12 - 10:40am Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 42.67 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 16.313 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 40.58 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-L7SCWO00N User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 213 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 26 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/02/12 - 10:43am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 39.38 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 114.968 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.35 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2XM7J94ZP User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 [!] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shug7272 Posted February 13, 2007 CID Share Posted February 13, 2007 Stop the back and forth or this thread will be locked. No need for all this. If anyone has a problem or feels they are wronged they need to pm a MOD. Not take shots here. If you feel someone else is breaking the rules report the post and/or pm a mod. Regular members do not enforce the rules and will not argue about who violated what rule. Tell the mods, they will take care of it. Just a FYI arguing with the mods or debating the rules with a mod is against the rules and will be dealt with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted February 13, 2007 CID Share Posted February 13, 2007 upload speeds from work(Weston, MO) ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 194 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 24 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/02/12 - 10:40am Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 42.67 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 16.313 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 40.58 % faster than the average for ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 213 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 26 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/02/12 - 10:43am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 39.38 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 114.968 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.35 % faster than the average for Some nice uploads there unitychild. That is what my system did at times before the past firmware upgrade that I have no control over. And to think an external antenna may even produce better results, more research on this end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted February 13, 2007 CID Share Posted February 13, 2007 Apparently you didnt read my post well enough. You just got the thread locked. I would recommend dropping it right now. Grow up people.Shug7272 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts