johnrance87 Posted August 16, 2008 CID Share Posted August 16, 2008 :cheesy:goodness me! :cheesy: got this result just now, did nothing much really.... :shocked: :shock: was bored so i went to my canopy page and then made notes on values and after i exited the page, i tested my speed... viola!! :2funny: Hope it stays this way.. wohoooo!! to me.. :grin: :2funny: Thanks to all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted August 16, 2008 CID Share Posted August 16, 2008 Do you thin you could post your settings for others to try ? If it works then I'll sticky it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrance87 Posted August 16, 2008 Author CID Share Posted August 16, 2008 Please dont post links from that site, they have been banned for spamming this site, thanks. haha! why is [this.site.has.been.banned.for.spammig] giving me erroneous results after doing coolbuster's 20 steps? oh btw, about my speed i just posted :grin:, maybe, if you don't mind me saying in Filipino: "nabigla lang cguro".. Don't know much really about it. I'm happy though, now i know that a little more increase of height in my canopy's pole should do the trick and perhaps I can make it to 1000kbps download :wink: :laugh: Thanks again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianonline Posted August 16, 2008 CID Share Posted August 16, 2008 thats what this community is all about.. friendly solution... and yeah I will take your excuse for saying that line. lol "nagbigla lang siguro" which means could be that it was just caught by surprise... and by the way there are threads where you can post your speed.. once again try using the SEARCH BOX.. thats what it is for... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrance87 Posted August 20, 2008 Author CID Share Posted August 20, 2008 --without proxy neat huh?! though using proxies are deceiving, but still, they let you see the "look and feel" of a tweaked Smartbro speed.. ahehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrance87 Posted August 20, 2008 Author CID Share Posted August 20, 2008 Oh look, I've just been designated as a junior member.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted August 20, 2008 CID Share Posted August 20, 2008 Oh look, I've just been designated as a junior member.. :grin2: :grin2: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrance87 Posted August 20, 2008 Author CID Share Posted August 20, 2008 :grin: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolbuster2007 Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 @ mudmanc4 OT i like that bug in your sig. it's directing us to the folding at home thread, why is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 @ mudmanc4 OT i like that bug in your sig. it's directing us to the folding at home thread, why is that? Wow, your not the first one to recognise the little bugger, but your the first that noticed, or at least said something about it. I see folding@home as one of the most self aware, selfless issues that any , and all of us can do for the em-betterment of the human race. Folding doesn't care who, or what you are, nor where on this Earth we live. But what Folding does do is give the genius researchers, and scientists advantage over the many mutations that efflict us in a medical way. From every disease, to illness, thats what they are working on. You don't have to have a blazin computer, or even a fast internet connection, every single work unit brings something to the plate. Folding is well known among avid internet users, but yet sits quietly from the general public. It's just my way of trying to bring awareness to what is going on at stanford university. So "catch " the bug, and fold . I didn't put the link in the bug, so if anyone wanted to use it, there is no adverse goodies in there, but really, it would be nice if anyone using the bug would place the link in there as well. Here's the code to place the bug in your sig, and link to the testmy.net folding thread. Just copy, and paste into your sig [url=http://www.testmy.net/t-12441][img=http://uploadingit.com/thumbs/small/765127_psgey/fly.gif][/url] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teejz Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 Did a random test... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianonline Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 Did a random test... cool.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teejz Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 Just lucky that I have a base station that seems to be neglected (going to be decommissioned soon). It's a stock canopy installation with 1MB cap (no tweaks). It should be more if Smart hadn't replaced my legacy Canopy antenna (see signature...). The base station I am supposed to be on is hell slow. So I'm making the most of this base station, while it lasts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianonline Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 Just lucky that I have a base station that seems to be neglected (going to be decommissioned soon). It's a stock canopy installation with 1MB cap (no tweaks). It should be more if Smart hadn't replaced my legacy Canopy antenna (see signature...). The base station I am supposed to be on is hell slow. So I'm making the most of this base station, while it lasts. clever! time will come that smart will install each user its own base station at home. ahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teejz Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 clever! time will come that smart will install each user its own base station at home. ahahaha Hehe... well, what I meant was "The base station I am connected to right now..." my bad. "Color Code 10" is the old AP/Backhaul that is to be decommissioned. (Really fast access... probably due to Smart slowly moving users to an new AP, which is "Color Code 5"). And "Color Code 5" is really sucky... with 200 Kbps average, and very high 'Jitter'. =( But still... the Smart dudes have been roving around the neighborhood changing Canopy antennas and 'rehoming' to a new base station (backhaul installation)... and from the looks of it. Older Canopy versions don't play well to new base station installations. Or probably a silly excuse to weed out tweakers... Good... (Til' the end of the month...) Sucks... (Probably the reason, if I ever change ISP's) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianonline Posted August 21, 2008 CID Share Posted August 21, 2008 i was the one who installed my own SM at home. i got extra SM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponat_calawakan Posted August 28, 2008 CID Share Posted August 28, 2008 this is my speed after i did the 20 step smartbro tweak... before i only have a 389 doald speed now see :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 429 Kbps about 0.43 Mbps (tested with 512 kB) Download Speed is:: 52 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 223 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 27 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2008/08/27 - 10:17pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-79NLJH5QV U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PIE7T4UG8 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrance87 Posted August 28, 2008 Author CID Share Posted August 28, 2008 @ponat Congrats Bro! Good for You, just keep on monitoring your speed <hoping it stays that way!> Don't go chasing for speeds that you perceive would be impossible to reach given your current location. Learn from me, I used to be not contented with my 550+ kbps CONSTANT speed. You know with all those blazing speeds posted in TMN you can't help but going after a wild goose chase. To cut the story short, I switched to another Base Station<which I initially thought was good since it has only 3 users with 100% uplink and downlink connectivity> which gave me crappy browsing speed but rather good on uTorrent Downloads.. Anyway, I'll try to pan my SM back to my old Base Station and hopefully gain back my former glory.. ahehe :grin: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pamonn Posted September 4, 2008 CID Share Posted September 4, 2008 Please do not post links, or banners from that website, they have been banned for spamming the site. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianonline Posted September 6, 2008 CID Share Posted September 6, 2008 glad to see a happy friend here. keep monitoring your connection. and keep us updated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr041283 Posted September 7, 2008 CID Share Posted September 7, 2008 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 1967 Kbps about 1.97 Mbps (tested with 6144 kB) Download Speed is:: 240 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 834 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 102 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2008/09/07 - 9:44am Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pamonn Posted September 7, 2008 CID Share Posted September 7, 2008 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 214 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 512 kB) Download Speed is:: 26 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/09/07 - 9:56am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 39.38 sec Tested from a 512 kB file and took 19.562 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 45.15 % of your hosts average (235.231) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M7Y0HWG48 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripclawph Posted September 8, 2008 CID Share Posted September 8, 2008 :cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxtado23xx Posted September 8, 2008 CID Share Posted September 8, 2008 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 524 Kbps about 0.52 Mbps (tested with 512 kB) Download Speed is:: 64 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 156 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 19 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2008/09/07 - 7:20pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5MAFHYRPC U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MJEGPFNQT User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funsize Posted September 8, 2008 CID Share Posted September 8, 2008 eh guys how did you surpass the 384kbps with smartbro i kinda envy your results here my spped... Your connection is: 273 Kbps or 0.3 Mbps You downloaded at: 33 kB/s You are running: 5 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 31.03 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:1151828595790 Test Time:: 2008/09/07 - 9:29pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 (.NET Client 3.5.30729.01) Test ID: 7PM5GUBSK (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 71.84 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) This was tested from a 512 kB file and took 15.352 seconds to complete it still freaking SLOW ...... soo considering we pay them honestly but in return they give us this crap service!! SMARTBRO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.