visionoflove Posted July 6, 2005 CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 Meridian Telekoms in Manila,Philippines,incredible speed for 20$ US.....awesome! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9572 Kbps about 9.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1168 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Wed Jul 06 2005 19:37:26 GMT+0800 Bottom Line:: 171X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.88 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 1006.59 % faster than the average for host (182.xxx) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted July 6, 2005 CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 visionoflove, Welcome to the forum.Really great speed for the money, wish I had it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
php Posted July 6, 2005 CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 btw,for those that wonder.. the test ID for that test is N29EIWJ03 visionoflove: you don't have to x out the 114... and is <a href="https://testmy.net/database/index.php?table_name=Master&function=search&where_clause=%60Master%60.%60COMP_ID%60+%3D+%271869591900718%27&page=0&order=Date&order_type=ASC">this</a> your test history? (I know some of it is...) it looks like you got a cached test there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionoflove Posted July 6, 2005 Author CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 is it ok for security purposes to post my ip address?i just got some trojan...i have firewall but.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lantom Posted July 6, 2005 CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 Hey All: I couple of things on this. 1) Visionoflove, if you really posted "cheating" the test, shame on you!!!! No one here really cares, they are smarter than that. 2) Vision, if you didn't "cheat" the tet than maybe something else happened, I'm going to ask PHP about that. 3) PHP, good catch on that post. 4) I was wondering if perhaps Vision got hit by something I've seen a few times. If I use my (back key) on brouser after a test I sometimes get a message that says something like. "Your speed of 12,200 exceeds the limits of your provider, this test will not be counted." I have cox with the 9/1Mps package, I get results from 2-9mps down. (Note: that is off of wireless with net running 2-4 systems at any one time, I really don't care about PURE numbers, so I don't try to max test daily.) Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
php Posted July 6, 2005 CID Share Posted July 6, 2005 is it ok for security purposes to post my ip address?i just got some trojan...i have firewall but.... no, you shouldn't post your IP address, but the host thing isn't a full IP address, only half of it... theres not a problem with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionoflove Posted July 7, 2005 Author CID Share Posted July 7, 2005 Hey All: I couple of things on this. 1) Visionoflove, if you really posted "cheating" the test, shame on you!!!! No one here really cares, they are smarter than that. 2) Vision, if you didn't "cheat" the tet than maybe something else happened, I'm going to ask PHP about that. 3) PHP, good catch on that post. 4) I was wondering if perhaps Vision got hit by something I've seen a few times. If I use my (back key) on brouser after a test I sometimes get a message that says something like. "Your speed of 12,200 exceeds the limits of your provider, this test will not be counted." I have Cox with the 9/1Mps package, I get results from 2-9mps down. (Note: that is off of wireless with net running 2-4 systems at any one time, I really don't care about PURE numbers, so I don't try to max test daily.) Thoughts? what the hell are you talking about?i'm a newbie in anything computers!i don't even know anything aside from surfing the net.i'm very worried that my pc will be hacked that's why i did not post my ip and the validation link. for me,i just went to this site,take the download test and got that result!i don't know why people are bothered! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
php Posted July 7, 2005 CID Share Posted July 7, 2005 You don't have to worry about the validation link.. its there for a reason... btw... Date Test_Type Test_Score Test_Size COMP_ID User_Name User_Host Test_ID 06 Jul 2005 Download 9572 12160 kB 1869591900718 visionoflove 181.114 N29EIWJ03 is all the information the validation link gives Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted January 10, 2006 CID Share Posted January 10, 2006 look at my speed test now: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 128 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 16 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Jan 11 07:17:38 UTC+0800 2006 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 64 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 65.98 % of your hosts average (190.14) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-39PODBVEZ and my plan is for 384 Kb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted January 12, 2006 CID Share Posted January 12, 2006 is this the same ISP ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted January 20, 2006 CID Share Posted January 20, 2006 yes, it's the same ISP though it became Smart Wi-fi. It's actually a fixed wireless connection. Look what I got today: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 102 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 12 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Fri Jan 20 12:40:41 UTC+0800 2006 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 85.33 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 54.26 % of your hosts average (190.14) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YMTU30OEF yet they're still claiming that my connection is at 384 Kbps. Another thing I would like to ask. Is it right to base the actual connection speed using Netstat Live max speed result. Can someone clarify me on this matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted January 20, 2006 CID Share Posted January 20, 2006 i believe they've resolved the problem we're having for almost a month. hope this will stay this way. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 366 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Sat Jan 21 07:10:30 UTC+0800 2006 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 93.65 % faster than the average for host (190.14) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WE8IHJFX7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 i thought they've resolved the problem. after two days from my last post, it even got worst. this is the only isp that have a major technical activity everyday. this broadband is only good for browsing and checking emails (without pictures attachments). better use a dial up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|3v|lon3| Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 Having Fun talking to yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 deoxyna is it the only isp available there ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 hey check this out back button results:) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 38401 Kbps about 38.4 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 4688 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Feb 22 14:15:06 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 686X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.22 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 1744.43 % faster than the average for host (60.63) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-V2S7IGU95 and this is from Tenn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 what is this Notice: Undefined index: x in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 11 Notice: Undefined index: out_size in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 19 Notice: Undefined index: out_src in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 23 Notice: Undefined index: q in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 52 Notice: Undefined index: comp_id in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 83 Notice: Undefined index: ip in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 93 Notice: Undefined variable: tt_2 in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 277 Notice: Undefined variable: progress_width in /home/testmyn/public_html/main.php on line 340 Notice: Undefined index: out_size in /home/testmyn/public_html/d_load.php on line 162 Be Patient... Testing... Loading 1013 kB of data This should take... Cable Internet - 2 - 32 seconds Typical DSL - 5 - 32 seconds Satellite - 7 - 32 seconds ISDN - 63 - 127 seconds Dial-Up - 145 - 282 seconds If this has taken longer... click here If this hangs and takes longer then expected, please close programs such as Zone Alarm and Symantec Client Security. Some firewalls have a hard time processing abnormally large files such as this test. Once disabled it is also possible you will need to restart your browser. If this appears to be 'hung-up' you may also want to try clicking here to load the test without the progress bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 this is what I really got but they both were validated :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 623 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 76 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Feb 22 14:35:54 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB download in 13.47 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 30.08 % of your hosts average (60.63) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6DGKUOAQ8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 this test here is what my ISP advertises for up and down speeds :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1765 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 215 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Feb 22 14:43:17 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.76 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 85.56 % of your hosts average (60.63) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BIQ5PCLM6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 ok I'm through playing:) Fred Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joserizal Posted February 22, 2006 CID Share Posted February 22, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 349 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 43 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 06:46:49 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 23.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 45.42 % faster than the average for host (211.89) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HRNT8O6F1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 421 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 51 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Feb 23 2006 06:56:50 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 20.08 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 74.69 % faster than the average for host (211.89) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DBW7KJU4E TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.4e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 307.55kB/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 255.60kB/s Warning! Client time-out while reading data, possible duplex mismatch exists Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link Smart WIFI, Philippines Motorola Canopy 5700SM 384/384 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted February 26, 2006 CID Share Posted February 26, 2006 be switching to another in two months time, just finishing my contract with this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joserizal Posted March 6, 2006 CID Share Posted March 6, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 372 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/05 - 5:21pm Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 33.33 % faster than the average for host (211.89) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8OGPQYAFW http://miranda.ctd.anl.gov:7123/ WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 277.03Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 328.96kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows 2003, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.2 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 386.51 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 1.35% of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [203.x.x.x] but Client says [192.168.0.2] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deoxyna Posted April 10, 2006 CID Share Posted April 10, 2006 now what about this :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 127 Kbps about 0.13 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 16 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/09 - 10:21pm Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 64 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 24.828 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 58.8 % of your hosts average (190.14) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FDRMWY8CX this connection sucks. i dont know why i'm still hanging on with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justx Posted April 19, 2006 CID Share Posted April 19, 2006 Nope. There are other providers and types of internet connection here, e.g., dial-up, cable, dsl and wireless. Wireless is not really that fast based on posts in the local threads in the Philippines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.