Jump to content

Doomsday

Members
  • Posts

    135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by Doomsday

  1. the motor is just one of those Summit GM Crate Motors {the 260 horse /350 torque one, it had the best cam profile out of all the ones i looked at and the cheapest }. The gas gauge hasn't worked in years and i never let it go past half a tank which is when it hovers in between F and half tank. it's stock just with the edelbrock performer manifold,some flowtech headers{they were on sale at the time} and a holley 650cfm 4 bbl.
  2. Turbo 350 with a shift kit, 10 bolt GM 3.73 out of a station wagon,straight pipe exhaust i pulled out the condensor box today with my dad {that thing in the left corner} and putting in a new blower motor. i grabbed a "squirrel cage" and a non A/C box out of a 72 convertable impala out in harry's u pull near my house a few years back. I do plan on getting a new air filter{it's old} and maybe a set of Keystone/Cragar SS rims and possible re-paint the car just primer grey with some parts black.
  3. My Car. New Motor Running. i took it for a drive after putting the hood on only to have the heater core after 34 years finally crap out and release coolant in the passenger floor. It sucks,but my dad bypassed it and i took it out around town. i think i have about 40 miles on the new motor. i want to get the new core in by next week to take the car down to a car show a few towns over.
  4. i don't want my ISP to come back to my house,after the last guy showed up here again and trying to figure out why my signal kept dropping he overtightened the line going to the back of the cable modem and messed up the threading. i still had trouble. so, i tapped off my sister's cable line to watch t.v. and then used the line in my room just for the cable internet.
  5. I picked up An Acer AL1916 at staples for $150 bucks{i think that was the sale price} everything was fine,till an eletric storm zapped my house and i got a dead pixel on it.the second one has been fine since then.
  6. the same power supply was in best buy for over $100 bucks.
  7. Well,i must have hardware sense cause on tuesday she came home and went to turn on her computer and nothing..........not a click or beep and i smelled that Burnt Eletronic Smell out the back of the PS. Opened up the case and just did a visual inspection.nothing on the motherboard is burnt,the smell is coming from the PS.The machine is being retired,it's an old Tangent ATX AMD setup { K-6 350MHz for christ sakes}.My dad found it in the garbage not even formatted with the person's personal data and all on it in the beginning and then i just stripped it and used leftover parts i had in the house to bring it up to speed. i dubbed it "The Franken-Box" yesterday,we went out and got her an Acer T-160 Tower.For $369 bucks it's a good deal.
  8. Well,looks like the computer i built my cousin that came with a Crappy PSU{i warned him about it,but he just wanted me to build it for him}finally crapped out and now he's left without a computer. I was thinking about picking him up an Antec 400watt PSU whenever they go back on sale,but i'm a little worried about the one i installed in my sister's computer after her PowerMax 200watt blew up{how it lasted as long as it did with 2 HD's,1 regular cd-rom and then a cd-burner i'll never know} There is sometimes an issue with turning the computer on or off,plus it sounds like something is up with one of the fans inside the PSU but the sound is so quick to stop i can't place were the noise is{i did replace all the fans inside her computer} Anyone have any other Suggestions?
  9. can i use this software now to reclaim the missing Hardrive space or will i have to format my computer?
  10. i think the best bet is to get another router.
  11. I still get AOL cd's time to time. I had a very big coaster collection at one time,till my parents threw out the cd's so i'm trying to rebuild the collection
  12. http://portforward.com/ this helped me out configuring my DI-524 Router.ever think about maybe looking into to see if windows firewall is causing a problem?
  13. i got a DVi Cable with the monitor and CRT Cable. i don't own a cell phone.my router {di-524} i disabled the wifi and took off the antenna due to the fact my house is wired. i shut the computer down,pulled the power cord,opened it up,grounded myself and checked the video card wiring,closed the case,plugged it in and powered it up. i see no faint lines now.
  14. i'm actually running the latest cat. drivers for the video card and downloaded the monitor drivers off acer's website. i had the digital cable so tight i had trouble getting it off to change it to the CRT cable.
  15. long time no post,been busy working on my car{35 year old bolts can be a pain to take out} i picked up a 19' inch LCD Monitor{Acer AL1916} at staples since my Mag CRT Tube's is slowly going out{blurry text,dark} hook up the new monitor to my digital connection on my video card{X1600 Pro AGP Sapphire} and i seen faint rolling horizontal lines,any hertz range resulted in lines. i had the same issues with my Mag and my old 9500 Pro.i had to use the CRT-DVi connector{that meant to turn the monitor around,unscrew the Dvi cable and switch back to the old blue-end CRT cable} and that fixed it. but i would like to use the digital cable. what could be the fix for this?
  16. odd one today: 060205200054 4-Error D503.0 TFTP, Invalid type, CONTINUE no clue.i'm actually not even suppose to have the Modem Ip.
  17. damn it,why i click that link when i had water in my mouth. that's nuts to charge that much. i don't even think the local shop guys i know charge that much.
  18. oh,that's a good one.i don't even think norton cost $150. i've had norton and trying to uninstall it,i had to format the person's computer.it was like a virus,infected everything and even DOS.
  19. they do,but damn i enjoy ticking them off. i rather do my repairs/upgrades myself. Best Buy's Idiot Squad are the best so far i've seen in screwing up. latest was just this monday,i watched a squad member take a screwdriver to the inside of the case without grounding it first.
  20. How Heat Pumps Work: http://home.howstuffworks.com/question49.htm
  21. hit it right on trogers. turns out the heat pump to my house was making noise.i couldn't hear it till i walked into the kitchen.turned off the heat and now :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3433 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 419 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:17:00 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 61X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.44 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 97.25 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GTUEP3CQV :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 294 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 36 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:18:49 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 28.44 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 97.67 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RIYTQOXEC my dad was telling me today he thought the heat pump didn't sound right. glad the connection is alright and i didn't start going mad switching stuff around,but now i'm worried about the heat pump
  22. East Coast. Pennsylvia something is def. wrong. Re-did the test: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 460.97Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 389.32kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 187.31 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 13 packets retransmitted, 109 duplicate acks received, and 118 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.68 seconds (6.18%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.98% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.115.x.x] but Client says [192.168.0.100] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.46<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [29200>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.46<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.35>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.09>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [29200>0] estimate = 0.35 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 187.31msec, and loss = 0.028132992 The theoretical network limit is 0.35 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 341.67 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 125.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 5.23 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 2.37 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' <edit> hid IP<br>-FE
  23. with your file: :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 280 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 34 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:46:46 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 30.12 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 92.72 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SOYZ8FWBN :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 610 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 74 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:48:33 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB download in 13.84 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 17.28 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7QM5VUWOF
  24. TCP options string = 020405b40103030501010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 1827840 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 5 bits (scale factor of 10) Unscaled Receive Window = 57120 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8 ) 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 73113.6 kbps (9139.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 29245.44 kbps (3655.68 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 53 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Second Link: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.81Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 342.99kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 167.81 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 12 packets retransmitted, 47 duplicate acks received, and 51 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.4 seconds (4.0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.115.x.x] but Client says [192.168.0.100] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [1.81<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [1.81<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.4>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] estimate = 0.4 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 167.81msec, and loss = 0.027491409 The theoretical network limit is 0.4 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 381.39 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 1785.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 83.10 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.86 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' <edit> hid IP <br>-FE
×
×
  • Create New...