Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by loki123

  1. omg, I MUST have been super drunk when I tried port fowarding on vmware, cause it dint work and now it does. well, in any way, thank you both cause you made me explore a bit more the nat thing on vmware!! thanks again!
  2. oke guys, me again =) I installed VMWare a couple of days ago, and the internet works fine, but I cant seem to route stuff to them >_< Im using a lil program from NetworkActiv, but its a shareware thang and it nags every once in a while. btw, my modem asings my external IP as an internal IP to the PC, so basicaly its a one way path... but theres gotta be a way or a program (free) So, my question is, how do I route data incoming from X port to my VPC IP? I hope thats clear O.o, im confused my self
  3. tommie, I think he ment w00t FOR d-way and not the other thing with the fingers.... then again I could be wrong...
  4. jaml331, please check your PM inbox.
  5. wow, that was fast! thanks -just!!
  6. wow, tis is cool. if ya can, send one to Shadow_l33t at hotmail dot com thank you! oh yeah, if ya still need a reason to why I should get an invite... Im very curious about what this service is and how it is different from regular TV : )
  7. hahahahaha, thats one ticket id be gald to get :haha:
  8. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 10172 Kbps about 10.2 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB) Download Speed is:: 1242 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/05/27 - 12:50am Bottom Line:: 177X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.82 sec Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 39.172 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 77.52 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IEV8HYA24 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2) [!] not bad for the 7Mb plan. I love it
  9. I have, Ill PM ya in a lil bit
  10. Im 16 ^^ 17 on sep!
  11. From Fraps.com " Vista not recording audio. Manually select the StereoMix input through the control panel. You may need to right-click on the sound device screen and enable "Show Disabled Devices". Restart Fraps and set it to "Use Windows input" " Im not running vista, Windows XP Sp2 for me. I guess Ill keep looking elsewhere.
  12. If you meen a picture that you set as background via "Set as desktop wallpaper", all you have to do is Rigth Click on the Desktop > Properties > Under Desktop tab change the wallpaper > hit apply. If the wallpaper is on the PC, you can just delete it if you dont want it, and if you set it from a pic online its allready gone. Hope that helps
  13. Elo again guys. Ive been using fraps for a while now and Ive been able to use it successfully, untill I bougth me new PC. It wont record audio. I have the latest drivers for everything on my PC. My audio device is the Realtek High Definition Audio. Fraps detects on Sound Device: "Realtek HD Audio Input" and on Sound Input: "Default". Is there anything anyone knows on how to repair this, the web site doesnt have much help. just in case Realtek HD Audio Drivers date is 11/15/2006 Using Fraps 2.8.2 build 6486 thanks!
  14. LOOL I saw this just now and came here to see if it was posted. I almost fell for it, till I saw the guy in the sewer
  15. 3.7 for me. Grafics is the lowest at 3.7. hdd is the highest at 5.2 ^^
  16. lmao, nah, this is just the school internet speed, mine is slower at home X___X To bad everythin is bloked here at school, oh well
  17. well, here are mine :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 17223 Kbps about 17.2 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 2102 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.dehekracing.com Test Time:: 2007/03/05 - 7:36am Bottom Line:: 300X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.49 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 9.975 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 227.06 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-G548ZDRTN User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]
  18. holy crap dude!!! thanks a million!!! its working again!!!!! weeeeee!!! its getting 60fps with no corny speed.
  19. LOL, nah I use to get 60fps too, but it didnt look like it was on coffe with chocolate and pure sugar. Im gonna try out the amd thing now.
  20. hye guys, I went off to try the dual core optimize thing, but I couldnt find anythin, so I decided to try teh vsync thing. I disabled it... I got like 300FPS, however this didnt resolve my problem, in fact it made it worse... grafics going waaay to fast. so I decided to record a vid, but to my astonishment, it started recording at 25fps and the game actually got playeble!!! now, I guess the question is, is there any apps or settings that I can use ti limit fps of my monitor to 25 ~ 26fps when I play that game, so that I dont have to record each time I play? thanks again guys!
  21. well, acording to fraps, I get 60fps, but even so, the grafics look like they are going mad. Im gonna upload a video as soon as I get home, cause I gotta go to school now X__X.
  22. Ok, so I upgraded my PC quite a bit a couple of weeks ago, and everything was running fine, untill I loaded up me favorite game, Unreal Tournament 99 (also know as goty). At first everythin looked good, but when I got into a game its started going crazy, like frames droping, or lagging. Ive tried all sorts of drivers, but I get the same results. My friend thinks its becuase I use x64, he has the same prob too. and I read there was an app to make certian programs to run better on x64, but no luck, any one has info on this? btw, the old specs are AMD Athlon @ 1.20GHz 768MB ram ATI Radeon 9600 series - AGP 256MB the new are AMD Athlon 64 X2 @ 2.82GHz OCed 1.75GB ram ATI Radeon X1600 PRO - PCIx16 512MB any help will be usefull, thansk again guys ^^
  23. Usually a Page cannot be displayed because the web site or server is not responding to your request. So I guess it would be a server problem...
  24. well, so far it has proven itself to me, although there is DDR2.
  25. So yeah, for about 4 years now Ive wanted an upgrade (yes, 4 yrs O.o). So, I bacame a magician, and made money appear before me, but thats not the point.. So, ive had my box for about, erm, 5 years maybe, so yeah it was old. Old Specs: AMD Athlon @ 1.20GHz 256MB+512MB of RAM (DDR) 40GB hdd Some crappy CD/DVD burner Some random PCI grfx card 200W PSU New Specs; AMD Athlon 64 X2 Toledo @ 2.4GHz 1GB+512MB RAM (DDR, X__X) 200GB HDD The same crappy CD/DVD burner ATI Radeon X1600 PRO 512MB 430W PSU So, yeah, not bad for like 550$ more or less, so, now what do you guys think? Did i get swindled or was it a good buy?
  • Create New...