Jump to content

VanBuren

Inactive Moderator
  • Posts

    6,389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by VanBuren

  1. hey Senic and welcome to the forum very nice speed there, what is your cap up and down? And what kinda upload speed do you get? VanBuren
  2. For recording movies from eg a game i recommend FRAPS, it also record sound, and you can choose the fps of the movie and so on. It will be recorded in raw format, so you need to compress it to eg .avi to do that you need virutual dub program. If you already have a movie, and like to export frames to pictures, that can be done in virutual dub aswell VanBuren
  3. sounds like a good deal resopalrabotnick I currently run a webserver on my pc, but i was thinking or running a standalone pc instead. I have a old AMD K6 333 Mhz and 48 MB of RAM and 4 GB HD. If i change HD to a 40 GB 7200 rpm and add some RAM i think it will be fine. I will see how much RAM thats fit on mobo, i figure i need atleast 128 MB to run XP and webserver. good thing about these slow pc, its very silent and dont generate much heat VanBuren
  4. buy new tires and wait until you can afford a new pc its a cheap life insurance, if your doing that kinda speeds VanBuren
  5. I think we have the same route from amsterdam to testmy.net I have good speed now, its only when its alot of traffic and users on site i get slowdowns have you tested when there is around 200 ppl+ on server? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3515 Kbps about 3.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 429 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 63 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.39 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=RG7Q2141C VanBuren
  6. I think i know why, i recommended one dude to reformat hes pc when he couldnt get rid of hes tweaks, but it was not that problem, he was using DW 6000 and the tcp analyzer dosent read hes registry settings, it only read the NOC pc registry. That was above my knowledge and a mistake by me. but it could have been RTB, dont trust him hes evil VanBuren
  7. try this guide https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1013.0 good luck VanBuren
  8. Hey David and welcome to the forum I think that depends where you live, alot of ppl has 5000/768 from Cox VanBuren
  9. hey air_jordan_forever and welcome to the forum nice speeds i agree with David, i dont think that you will go faster then that you changed DefaultReceiveWindow to 70 000, that value seems to work very well here, have you tested other values aswell? VanBuren
  10. hehe im impressed, you know Swedish vars
  11. I checked your ISP stats and your scores is in the lead So i bet your friend has tweaked it abit one thing to add, to get a real accurate speed try using the 2992 KB test, did you use smart test now? VanBuren
  12. not bad, have you tweaked anything? VanBuren
  13. i dont think it affect speed, unless your ISP wants to... I heard some ISP
  14. I use Hypersnap DX 5, works great VanBuren
  15. hey **eagle** and welcome to the forum thats above average in here and nothing to be ashamed off what is your upload? and what is your cap, and what ISP? VanBuren
  16. mbrainerd i hope you finally get what you paying for post again when you get that modem good luck VanBuren
  17. no problem I also thought about that, so i tryed default values, and some well known tweaks that always work, and all that didnt help.... Also one important thing to add, i have no speedissues against other sites. VanBuren
  18. : my average should be pretty nice by now what bother me most is that i dont understand why my speed get so low on a 160 ms ping..... I have more speed to japan on a 350+ ping on 160 ms i usally pull between 3-8 Mbps depending number of hops and server i know i has to be loss of TCP packets, but the trace dosent give me any clues...... VanBuren
  19. okey this is my last speed post in this thread 200 users on site :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 293 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 36 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 5 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 28.44 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=WNNA1OOEX things just seems to getting worce VanBuren
  20. i used to play one of the first multiplayer FPS game made, its Outlaws, a wildwest shooter, that game was all fps and have a laggy connection I had 1000 fps top and a average of around 600 while playing, that game was actually running faster with that amount of fps and i could see ppl alot faster then they could see me if they played with vsync on and 60 fps hehe luckely new games, is more fair, antilag coding and no big adventage in high fps VanBuren
  21. I can see we use same nodes inside theplanet, but you have one more node then me, node nr 15 in your route. I think that show that there is no problem inside the planet, the problem must be on some of these nodes, strange thing ping shows up ok....... this is from my trace 15 117 ms 117 ms 117 ms so-7-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.31.186] 16 119 ms 118 ms 118 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.29.122] 17 145 ms 145 ms 145 ms so-2-3-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.13] 18 145 ms 145 ms 145 ms 64.124.79.77.theplanet.com [64.124.79.77] cos i can get better speed from eg dslreports in Phoenix and its using us.above.net aswell VanBuren
  22. well alot better then me tested this 2 min ago :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 761 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 93 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 14 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 11.01 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=3DMBV04BI VanBuren
  23. http://www.upseros.com/testvelocidad.php
  24. these test was taken at almost same time (5 min ago), usually i get around 400 KB/s + from all those VanBuren
×
×
  • Create New...