VanBuren

Total Time Spent Online: 26 days, 14 hours and 51 minutes. Total Posts: 4913 posts Total Topics Started: 231 topics Number of Polls Created: 2 polls Number of Votes Cast: 78 votes

well, i dont think you will go faster then this, also thats not windows default settings so you been tweaking VanBuren

here is mine 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226 .177.2] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238] 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms vlan3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.233] 4 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms ge1-0.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.225] 5 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms pos3-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.134] 6 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms pos6-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.13] 7 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos6-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.181] 8 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos14-0.cr1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.129 ] 9 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos13-0.cr2.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.106 ] 10 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms ge1-1.dr4.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.118.50] 11 * * * Beg

great, but 100 Mbps is overkill right now, atleast for me i downgraded to 10/10 and its fast enough for me VanBuren

try this aswell http://www.testmy.net/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=5983&st=st&ta=&top=&nobar=1 VanBuren

since me and just- are getting fair results its most likely a problem on the route overseas im downgraded to 10 Mbps and pull this :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9468 Kbps about 9.5 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1156 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 169X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.89 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 52.85 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-795JOTG2R'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-795JOTG2R Edit my speed overseas seems fine :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8501 Kbps about 8.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1038 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Sep 30 2005 17:13:10 GMT+0200 Bottom Line:: 152X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.99 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 47.47 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8KQ3RFO0N VanBuren

its multiple with 1024, thats the recommendations cablenut team gives, but after todays research i think multiple with 4096 is more correct however, i dont think you will notice any speed improvements by divide 384000 in 4096 to get an even multiple value... VanBuren

DefautReceivewindow is a AFD parameter and GlobalMaxTcpWindowsize, TcpWindowsize is a TCPIP parameter If you have windows XP SP2 installed, TCP analyzers will read your DefaultReceiveWindow as TcpWindowsize (RWIN). and with 2k / XP SP1 the analyzer will only read TcpWindowsize. below is a explenation on how AFD tweaking works, and why AFD parameters dont have to be multiple with MSS quote from http://smallvoid.com/tweak/winnt/network.html#AFD_WINDOW "In the WinNT network architecture a layer is placed on top of the TCPIP layer called AFD(Ancillary Function Driver for Winsock). The AFD provides the winsock interface, which is used by most network applications in Windows and is also supporting things like DNS and DHCP. The AFD provides two windows which acts as a flowcontrol for the application creating the socket: * AFD-Send-Window: Used when the application is sending data over a connection, if if more data is sent than the receiver is able to acknowledge then the AFD-Send-Window will block the transfer for the application, when it reaches the limit of the AFD-Send-Window. * AFD-Receive-Window: Used when the application is receiving data over a connection, if the application is not able to receive data fast enough or is blocked by other processing which keeps it from receiving data, then the AFD-Receive-Window will act as a buffer until it reaches the limit of the AFD-Receive-Window, where it will then block the remote-application from sending data. The two default AFD-Windows is by default self tuning using the following values depending on the total amount of RAM detected. When an application creates a socket it can specify a different AFD-Window than the default. * Default AFD Send- & Receive-Window = 4096 Bytes (If less than 19 MByte RAM) * Default AFD Send- & Receive-Window = 8192 Bytes (If more than 19 MByte RAM) In the scenario where using a network with high latency or high bandwidth the AFD-Send-Window will constantly be blocking the application's transfer if the AFD-Send-Window is set too low. The AFD-Send-Window should have the same value as the optimal TCPIP-Receive-Window to get the best upload-speed. In the scenario where using an application which is not able to handle situations where the data is being sent in bursts. Then increasing the AFD-Receive-Window will allow to smooth out the bursts, and avoid blocking the remote-application sending and will increase the overall download speed. Also making sure that the window is larger than any reply being sent back will avoid blocking of the sender of the reply, as it has to wait for ACK to complete it's reply. To set the default size of the AFD-Windows use the following DWORD registry keys : [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SYSTEM CurrentControlSet Services Afd Parameters] DefaultReceiveWindow = 16384 DefaultSendWindow = 16384 Note that the AFD-Windows should be rounded to a multiple of page size(Usually 4096 Bytes). Not a multiple of the Maximum Segment Size(MSS) which is recommended for the TCPIP-Window. Note that applications which specifies their own AFD-Windows for each of their sockets by using setsockopt and specifying a new value for the SO_RCVBUF parameter (Not possible for RPC services), will not be affected by changing the default AFD-Windows. Related : Recommended settings for the TCP/IP stack More info MS KB Q214397 More info MS KB Q246984" VanBuren

i guess im geek too :haha: You got 9 right! Excellent, you have the makings of a proper propeller head. VanBuren

when you get packetloss, your progress bar will freeze also test at off peak hours and compare VanBuren

read this http://www.dslnuts.com/2kxp.shtml VanBuren

your welcome anox195 cablenut is the shit VanBuren

dude, dont know what your refering to, our Mod

follow all these steps http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-2097.0 and post again VanBuren

IE probl calculating speed wrong, click ctrl+alt+del and check taskmanager network graph usage during the download VanBuren

@ anox195 follow all these steps and post again http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-2097.0 VanBuren

yea i have the same problem VanBuren

take a look here http://www.joeuser.com/articles.asp?c=1&aid=1886 VanBuren

its not free, but i guess its a good deal i wanted some second opinions on that Intel dual core i havent checked it out much myself VanBuren

yea i was checking out some benchmarks, the AMD

lol yea folding will be great, and also hosting gameserver VanBuren

hey guys, today i got an offer of leasing a PC, here is the basic package and also a picture of options to upgrade it. too bad they dosent offer AMD, o well this should work pretty good i guess any thoughts about the options to the basic package? I havent checked out any tests with that dual core 3.2 yet. Edit: btw here is a pic of the rig http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/dimen_xps600?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs VanBuren

Blunted got Gbps LAN, im only at 100 Mbps VanBuren

This topic has been moved to HELP! With Tests. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=8227.0[/iurl]

dern nice Dittoz, glad things worked out for you VanBuren