VanBuren

ah just realized i need to fix my sig, dont have that Dell anymore I been leasing it from my former employer, but i quit the job for another, so i had to return the pc or buy it. I choose to return it cos they wanted me to pay 2 662,22 USD for it even tho it was 1 year old... i offered them 2 014,65 USD, but they refused. Well. now I'm back on my old PC. will buy a new next year VanBuren

thats true, a test should last around 8 to 10 seconds here is what i get on the 20MB :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 35299 Kbps about 35.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 4309 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/26 - 3:56am Bottom Line:: 616X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.24 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 4.867 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 86 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I5FGO0VJL'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-I5FGO0VJL User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0. Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8 [!] and 12 MB :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 15118 Kbps about 15.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1845 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/26 - 4:05am Bottom Line:: 264X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.56 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.589 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 79.66 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BWUTVJ4O3 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0. Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8 [!] size is not the whole story, progressbar slow me down aswell. If you have a fast computer progressbar shouldnt make a diff, but im currently on a AMD 1700+ from -01 VanBuren

i think this is the fastest ive gone from testmy.net server VanBuren

hehe, im and its getting better VanBuren

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 31886 Kbps about 31.9 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3892 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 12:51pm Bottom Line:: 556X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.26 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.388 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 67.58 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3VAFH2C9B User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 32799 Kbps about 32.8 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 4004 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 3:28pm Bottom Line:: 572X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.26 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.238 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 72.37 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5JEUW4QDI User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 [!] cant complain even tho my cap is 100Mbps VanBuren

looking good VanBuren

computers with this version i need to mark "Do not scan opened files" aswell... works again :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 30257 Kbps about 30.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3693 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 12:35pm Bottom Line:: 528X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.28 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.678 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 59.1 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1ZWY0QKT3 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 [!] VanBuren

i cant belive this shit i had a old firefox version, so i updated it and now i have the same freaking problem again... i figured i just had to add it to the trusted zone again, but no luck this time bah, i give up ... VanBuren

yea i set it to not scan firefox traffic as shown in picture, the speed went from 3 to 28 Mbps, thats good enough for me VanBuren

problem solved had to add firefox to trusted zone hmm wtf, now attachments dosent work for me VanBuren :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 28402 Kbps about 28.4 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3467 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 10:36am Bottom Line:: 495X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.3 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 6.049 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 49.3 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RT8YLVFGD User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050717 Firefox/1.0.6 [!]

i havent noticed any gain/loss in performance compared to Norton, but the AV scan seems to be faster then Norton. Im back on my old rig, so every gain in perfornance means much these days... i think your right Swimmer, it using some type of proxy, i just neeed to find out if its possible to disable this Blunted do you know how to disable this? Did you have to uninstall it to get real scores? VanBuren

i thought i would give it a try since many ppl are very happy with it so i bought it a few weeks ago, but having problems with it the problems is only with speedtesting, flat download seems to work good testing speed against Testmy.net, used to be around 30 Mbps down, now its very inconsistent. Between 3 to 7 Mbps. I see it starts download the testfile in network graph, at 3 MB/s, then it stops and browser starts to load the file. Its like the antivirus program has to scan it before it loads in my browser. Also, testing speed against speedtest.net servers it give me cached results, same goes for speakeasy test. I haven't dig very deep into the issues yet, but i was thinking if someone here has the same product and same problems and hopefully a solution VanBuren

try this file Sparticus013 VanBuren

its my first router so i cant compare it, but i like mine as well Easy setup interface and very good performance VanBuren

you can read more here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol but a easy explanation is, you have a modem and your ISP cap it to a certain rate, that means a raw data rate. TCP protocol using a overhead thats useless when it comes to speed, but its a reliable protocol cos the receiver send acknowledge packets to the sender, and if a packet is lost the sender tries to retransmit the packet. With UDP protocol you will get the same speed as your modem limits you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol VanBuren

hey Noobz your score is fine, wont go faster then this you need to add a TCP overhead ( 7 to 10% )on your score and then your faster then advertised 1,07 x 505 = 540,35 Kbps TRuSPEED downstream 1,07 x 212 = 226,84 Kbps TRuSPEED upstream I would leave it like that, since your far away from testmy.net server if you do want to make something about that upload, try increasing DefaultSendWindow in cablenut, set it to 32120 VanBuren

This topic has been moved to Networking and Hardware. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=16488.0[/iurl]

VanBuren

a bit faster today dont think it will go much faster then this on this route 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 3 ms <1 ms <1 ms ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226 .177.2] 3 4 ms <1 ms <1 ms vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238] 4 1 ms <1 ms 1 ms port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1 19.233] 5 8 ms 1 ms 1 ms ge1-0.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.225] 6 24 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26] 7 23 ms 21 ms 20 ms pos5-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.97] 8 21 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18 1] 9 144 ms 38 ms 176 ms pos13-0.cr1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.122 ] 10 21 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos1-0.br1.sto2.se.bredband.com [195.54.117.14] 11 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms s-b3-pos6-1.telia.net [213.248.101.49] 12 21 ms 22 ms 21 ms s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.89] 13 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms kbn-bb1-link.telia.net [213.248.65.142] 14 137 ms 151 ms 151 ms nyk-bb1-pos0-1-0.telia.net [213.248.64.22] 15 153 ms 134 ms 151 ms chi-bb1-pos6-0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.153] 16 152 ms 151 ms 151 ms so0-2-0-250.j2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.69] 17 153 ms 151 ms 151 ms unknown.scnet.net [216.246.50.2] 18 155 ms 151 ms 152 ms cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2 40.37] Trace complete. VanBuren

:twisted: VanBuren

not bad overseas VanBuren

/happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' />

/happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' />

wow, i tested again this time with Firefox, and then test freaked out ... my upload is way too high and download is too low.. my connection is capped at 100 Mbps down and 13 Mbps up this is what Firefox gave me so they do have some problems.... VanBuren