Jump to content

xs1

Moderators
  • Posts

    4,811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by xs1

  1. On 12/19/2020 at 8:52 AM, mudmanc4 said:

    Entertain me, have you run scp/large-file  to or from local servers, is the throughput what you would expect?

     

    I know you know your shit, I’m just trying to get what your explaining I’m my head 

     

    I'm not sure what your asking. what is scp?  I'm not sure how to be more clear. 

     

    • If i am trying to upload files, large or small, to lets say to google drive, or Facebook, or lets say im doing a speed test, I will get 100% of my speed; 1g/1g Via the "internet" its no problems

     

    • If I try and use any p2p programs, apex dc++, or qbittorent, uTorrent, ANY p2p program really, it will limit my upload speeds to 250. Whether transferring these files to someone in Arizona, you, or even MYSELF to my other PC in the same home, on the same network, if its p2p, it will throttle it. 

     

  2. On 12/17/2020 at 7:46 AM, mudmanc4 said:

     

    I get the throttling issue, ISP's are doing some interesting 'things' since so many are domiciling.

    Maybe I'm just not getting the other part, if I am understanding, Frontier is infiltrating your internal network. If so, and don't get upset here, why would you not have a hardware layer segregating internal/external networks?

     

    I say this since I've seen it first hand years ago, where modems are or were on their own /24, ISP side, by network mistake, I found it. Since that point I have been segregating layers via appliances to the best of my knowledge .

     

     

     

     

     

    I mean, i dont know about "infiltrating" , lol.? I'm assuming it's the ONT that monitors/ throttles the apps or ports. cause it's factually not the router.  All i know is whether im sending you a file, or sending it to my other pc on my network... the speeds are throttled/shaped. Will not exceed 250 mbs (for any sustained time , a bit over with burst of course) Unless its a web transfer, like google drive or facebook or ftp, speed test etc. 

  3. 21 hours ago, mudmanc4 said:

    Now you have my attention. More info on this statement is mandatory.

     

    Well on a gigabit connection, ideally 2 pc's on the same network, in the same facility should pretty much be able to utilize somewhere close to "gigabit" speeds. As you can see from my prior posts' attachment, that isn't the case. Frontier limits "file sharing" and "p2p"  im guessing programs or ports to 250. Whether im sharing to the general public, or trying to transfer files to my own networked PC's... If its limited to 250 MAX.   Now if it goes through 8080 , or im assuming 80, ( like for speed tests or ftp, uploading to google drive etc) it'll "max" the connection. P2P, Direct Connect, Torrent, TeamShare, Remote Desktop, etc. All limited 

  4. 10 hours ago, CA3LE said:

    If you aren't seeing a bottleneck anywhere else... they very well may be throttling.

     

    Or maybe the program you're using is limiting you in some way.  Have you tried a different BT client?

     

     

    Yes sir.  qbittornet & utorrent. same results.   Check out this uniformity: 

     

     

    uniof.jpg.bd3323f10329a0f565f9ce67fc5211b6.jpg

     

    If I pause all other uploads, the top one will jump to the "max" speed of 23 MbiB/s and hold there. 

     

  5. 4 hours ago, Sean said:

    Sorry, I can't think of any better way to explain what I mentioned.  As the hard disk is constantly seeking due to the way BitTorrent clients request pieces of data at random, the maximum hard disk speed throughput will be much lower than the 228.56MB sequential reading. 

     

    The only other suggestion I have is to try moving just one or two of the most popular torrents to the SSD that fit. 

    ok i went ahead and did what you suggested. I moved one of the more popular torrents to the SSD. I made it the only torrent running. Results are  exactly the same. Hits the same speed and stops dead.  Interestingly enough, when I re-engaged the other torrents, that one died and its now spread the speed over all 12 torrents, at the same exact speed..  That sounds like throttling and shaping to me. I'm fairly certain that's the case now.  It's literally almost holding solid at the same exact speed as it did on the other drive. 

     

    @CA3LE

     

    3243353.jpg

  6. maahhnnn... ?  Trust me. i know where your at. We've had alot of dogs over the years.. at one point 7 at the time. Its always tough having to make such a decision. Personally, i think spending the last few months / years with him would be the best route. You are correct, the sugary would be 50/50 and 90% of the time it spreads more rapidly afterwards. I've had 3 dogs with cancer. 2 got surgery and they died very shortly after. 1 we let go ( it was behind his left eye) for years. Years before we put him down. He was in 0 pain, but it had gotten into his brain causing nosebleeds. That was tough. Very tough...he wagged his tail all the way down to the very last minute. Like he knew. He was 14 years old, but still acted and felt like a puppy. It is also hard on the other dog(s) when one doesn't come home. its unavoidable. After a short while, we usually went down to the rescue and adopted another, to keep the other company/companionship.  It's never feasible to put yourself or family in jeopardy tho, that is for sure. Especially for a second time. Pups had a good, long life.... as long hard as it is, you have to say goodbye sometimes. Its for the best on all parties. 

     

     

  7. 1 hour ago, Sean said:

    I suspect the hard disk is the bottleneck.  Most BitTorrent clients fetch random parts of a file from seeders and peers, whereas FTP and HTTP clients generally fetch files sequentially from start to finish.  This means that with just a handful of BitTorrent peers, the hard disk will be constantly seeking for the random pieces the peer clients request. 

     

    31MBs (250Mbps) seems very good for a high end hard disk.  Most consumer hard disks will struggle to even deliver 10MB/s randomly seeking non-stop, e.g. try copying a 5GB file from a hard disk while running a virus scan on it at the same time.  I'm not sure about DC++ or SoulSeekqt, but even if they run deliver files sequentially, the hard disk will still be busy seeking all over the place for the BitTorrent clients. 

     

    I suggest try moving those 10 most popular torrents to the main SSD (or to a separate SSD), then see how this affects the overall upload speed. 

     

     

    Thanks for the reply! I would also agree other than the fact the hard drive isn't overloaded as far as i can tell.also, when downloading on torrent i can (almost) max my 1gbit connection... so if the wright will handle it, id assume the read can do the same I'll post specs to the drive, maybe you see something i dont. Im no expert with hardware by any means, but i feel it should handle it? Also, the torrents = 742gb.. my SSD is not that large lol. :(

     

    Tech Specs
    Specifications are provided by the manufacturer.
    Header
    Manufacturer :Hitachi Hard Drives
    Brand :WD
    Product Line :WD Ultrastar DC HC520
    Model :HUH721212ALE604
    Packaged Quantity :1
    Storage
    Type :Hard drive
    Hard Drive
    Hard Drive Type :Internal hard drive
    Form Factor :3.5"
    Form Factor (metric) :8.9 cm
    Form Factor (Short) :3.5"
    Form Factor (Short) (metric) :8.9 cm
    Storage Interface :Serial ATA-600
    Interface :Serial ATA-600
    Capacity :12 TB
    Average Seek Time :8 millisecond
    Max Seek Time :8.6 millisecond
    Average Latency :4.16 millisecond
    [b]Data Transfer Rate :600 MBps
    Internal Data Rate :255 MBps
    Spindle Speed :7200 revolutions per minute
    Buffer Size :256 megabyte, 256 megabyte
    Bytes per Sector :512[/b]
    Non-Recoverable Errors :1 per 10^15
    Load / Unload Cycles :600,000
    24x7 Operation :Yes
    Features :Dual Stage Actuator (DSA), Advanced format 512e, Secure Erase function, Enhanced Rotational Vibration Safeguard (RVS), HelioSeal, Dynamic fly height technology, 24x7 continuous operation
    Interface Provided
    Interfaces :1 x SATA 6 Gb/s
    Bay Required
    Compatible Bay :3.5"
    Power Consumption
    Power Consumption :5 Watt (idle), 6.9 Watt (active)
    Miscellaneous
    MTBF :2,500,000 Hours
    Compliant Standards :RoHS 2011/65/EU
    Dimensions & Weight
    Width :4 inch
    Depth :5.8 inch
    Height :1 inch
    Weight :23.28 ounce
    Service & Support
    Type :5-year warranty
    Service & Support Details
    Service & Support :Limited warranty - 5 years
    Shock & Vibration Tolerance
    Shock Acceleration (Operating) :70 gram
    Shock Duration (Operating) :2 ms half-sine wave
    Shock Acceleration (Non-operating) :300 gram
    Shock Duration (Non-operating) :2 ms half-sine wave
    Vibration Acceleration (Operating) :0.67 gram
    Vibration Frequency Range (Operating) :5-500 Hz
    Vibration Acceleration (Non-operating) :1.04 gram
    Vibration Frequency Range (Non-operating) :2-200 Hz
    Environmental Parameters
    Min Operating Temperature :41 degree Fahrenheit
    Max Operating Temperature :140 degree Fahrenheit
    Min Storage Temperature :-40 degree Fahrenheit
    Max Storage Temperature :158 degree Fahrenheit

     

    svrhdd.jpg

  8. (att: @CA3LE

     

    Ok guys. let me run by something with you. I am far from new to networking, as most of you OG folks know. Here's the problem im running. into. Frontier Communications is my ISP. (fuck frontier btw)

     

    - I have a fully symmetric 1Gbit plan & I'm thinking, almost guaranteeing that Frontier is throttling P2P programs. The reason i say this, is because my content server is currently running 3 main p2p programs. Running Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Edition. It's literally its only job. Core i5, 8Gb ram, SSD main, 12Tb WD ultrastar Helo Server edition content drive. 

     

    It's running top 10 most popular torrents in the nation at the moment (via qbittorent client) , Apex dc++ , & SoulSeekqt. The server currently has 5TB of media being shared (and climbing) over the 3 p2p programs, 24/7, 0 bandwidth throttle on any program. The amount of connections, the amount of uploads going simultaneously etc is all irrelevant. The content being shared is a variety of things from music, anime games movies etc. It's all items people want, & the uploads never stop. It's a constant barrage of uploads, so it's not like people aren't interested.  

     

    Issue being, is not matter what i do... the upload speeds will never exceed 250Mibit I've tried limiting the connections number thinking the router may be overloaded, no help. I've tried opening up the floodgates with thousands of connections, no change really. now again, this is only on p2p, all running simultaneously, or separately, no change. I literally can take speed tests ann max the connection upload and download. i can upload or download from my google drive and max the connection, upload and download. P2p on the other hand, i can max the download, but never the upload.

     

    Granted, i've also tried multiple PC's running the same p2p programs @ the same time as the server, and they will fight each other for bandwidth. i've also plugged directly into the ONT, and took the router out of the equation altogether, same results.  

     

    So... what do you guys think?  Is there something im missing? Is it just being ISP throttled? Any ideas? 

     

    Feel free to ask any questions i may have not covered. Any help would be vastly appreciated. 

  9. @TCas125



    "My MTU is set to 1500, turned off QoS, hardwired to router. Router is separate device than modem. DNS is set to 8.8.8.8. 


    Latency test:

    https://testmy.net/latency?gID=pxappqtqpv"

     


     


    I see what your ping plotter is saying, but what's up with the latency results?? Other than to google and amazon, your latency is outrageous just about every where else!  I almost wonder if you have a bum splitter somewhere causing all your irrationalities. 


    Here's a latency test i just took.. 


    https://testmy.net/latency?gID=oziuorfhyt

     

  10. 2 hours ago, cholla said:

    I searched & found the old topic "Show off your Desktop"

    It even had a part II.

     

     

     

     

     

    First of all, HOW THE F**K did you find that?? ???  i swear to do GOD i searched for like a good... 30 minutes.. trying to use the forum search.. tried the exact title, tried variations of the title, took out words, added words.... NOTHING! I was trying to find that EXACT thread and the search brought up random dumb shit... Like wtf? it doesn't work for me?!

     

    see??

     

    searchresults.thumb.jpg.3799059046f75346376698709336cb58.jpg

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...