Indestructable

Notes and recommendations: Check FAQ on MTU for XP (FAQ #2252) Choose RWIN between 28400 and 75260 (FAQ #586) download/use DRTCP .. (FAQ #578) Read the tweak FAQ I can't f***ing believe this. what the hell does this mean?

ARE YOU SERIOUS?????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111oneoneoneone hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! :D :D :D :D :haha: :haha: sorry, I'm really tired.

I'l try to get a video of it...since no one will try it. btw, microwwave, can you see the picture in my sig?

<- ehhh... thanks for the help dude! (as always... ) edit: waht does this mean? Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering

here's another test see if anything changed! ha ha... wanna know something really funny? UCSC (UC Santa Cruz) is only about an hour away from where I live! WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 265.38Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.85Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 116.02 msec; the Packet size = 1420 Bytes; and There were 40 packets retransmitted, 256 duplicate acks received, and 292 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 265.38Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.88Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 138.01 msec; the Packet size = 1420 Bytes; and There were 42 packets retransmitted, 193 duplicate acks received, and 236 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

thanks Van!!!

where do you guys get that web100 tool from? I forgot the address.

:haha: :haha: hey, did anyone actually try it?

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2943 Kbps about 2.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 359 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 2005 22:36:00 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 53X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.85 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-PZSLB78JV :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2971 Kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 363 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 2005 22:36:26 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 53X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.82 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-61K5ZCV2L :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 235 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is:: 29 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 2005 22:40:14 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 35.31 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-3TIVSJM7H :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 227 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is:: 28 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sat Jan 29 2005 22:41:12 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 36.57 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-JA6I50FNH

what that guy said!

ok, here's how to make a coke...um...well, you'll see. 1. Get a coke in a bottle or can. 2. Open 3. Get some sugar 4. With your coke in one hand, and the sugar in the other, pour a good amount of sugar into coke. 5. Watch as your coke fizzes over and spills on the floor! try it now!!! :haha: :haha:

welcome to the forums lethal93ta! what package do you have? damn good score!

what is wrong?

dude, that can't be from home...

who, me??? I'm outraged!

oh geez, ok , knowlegeble folks, go here please. http://lemonaid.250free.com/httpd.conf could someone please help me to fix it??? thanks.

uhhh.,kinda...

I like the mods only section. It rocks.

hmm, interesting! I'll have to try hitting stop sometime. that's pretty useless, I'd say.

well, yeah you could! I do, but I don't have an actual www.com name, mines at http://lemonaid.serveftp.com , and at no-ip.com, you can register a domain with them, and use it just like I use my lemonaid.serveftp.com subdomain! anything else I can help you with?

check these out! i made themistake of turning on norton during the speed test. the second i did, it popped up (FF did) an error saying that the document contained no data! oops! check these out: Screen shot 01 Screen shot 02 Screen shot 03 Screen shot 04

hey, microwave, ya know that button that says release? that releases the current IP # that is assigned to your computer, and gives it back to your ISP in order for them to "lease" it to someone else's computer. Get it? so, (if you are not running a webserver or such that knows your ip, like say you are runnig www.microwave.com off your pc, and you have it set to come from xx.xxx.xxx.xx, don't do this!!!), open up that utility (i think it's winipcfg?) and push that button that says "release all". wait till it shows 00.000.000.00 or such and click "renew all". that will "give back" the old IP # that was currently assigned to your pc, and get a new one! Your internet should still work, tell me if you have any problems, ok? just as long as you are not running a webserver that won't automatically update the DNS when your ip c. hope that helps someone! indestructable

hmm...when editing live concerts, I just use WAV or *sometimes* mp3pro, but I can't hear the diference between the two. The only problem with the way I do it is that ya gotta have a lotta hard drive space to encode an entire 28 song live concert into WAV!!! hope that helps Junkie.

SARCASUMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!