Blunted

so why did you up the ante from kilo to mega? i wonder what the local isps would charge for a 768 mbps upload? i have seen it for $10,000 a month. lol :o :o

IMO cable sucks cause of caps and high latency and everyone i know with cable isnt happy with games. not saying its bad but i get the same everywhere i am. i had optimum online and it sucked even with over 900 up and 9000 down

i also agree cause i have a few friends that get horrible speed and support from this ISP.

:::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1290 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 157 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Aug 26 2005 17:13:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 6.52 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 200.7 % faster than the average for host (covad.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UHQGR93T8

me too

i dont think its much more tweakable since dsl is more limited by distance and line quality.

this happened before and will be fixed soon i'm sure

:::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 674 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 82 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Thu Aug 25 2005 17:07:28 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 12.49 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 20.36 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HPS8YCIAN :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5142 Kbps about 5.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 628 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Thu Aug 25 2005 17:08:19 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 92X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.63 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 6.44 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BOW4PULVI

yea me too and i cant see my results

kinda messed up that post sorry i had 2 posts open for some reason on the same thing

my max speeds are 768 up and 6000 down and i get about 5100 down and 675 up average. my provider is speakeasy.net and this is a adsl (radsl i think) line. also Your PC/Workstation has a 48.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.92 Mbps. The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.93 Mbps My cable nut settings

i also get this error Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/testmyn/public_html/results_d.php on line 453

look at the 100 mb lan pic above its the 1st pic. kerio does slow it down a little bit but i still get around 9000 Kb a sec with it on so its not that bad. i didnt tweak much but i messed around with cable nut and gonna finish it tomorrow and see what i can get on gigabit ethernet.

nothing specific but just if i can some tweak anything else or see if there is something else wrong that i didnt know. line performance and what it should be. thanks

well i dont have linux but tested on a server with that software. thanks i'll have to read that later.

1. dial up (aol) 2. OOl cable (optimum online) 3. speakeasy adsl and covad sdsl

they have to cap or else everyone would go crazy with it but you got some nice speed.

WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 2328 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 2328 CurCwnd: 49680 CurMSS: 1380 CurRTO: 280 CurRwinRcvd: 49640 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 6237600 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 4520 DupAcksIn: 0 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 49680 MaxMSS: 1380 MaxRTO: 280 MaxRTT: 90 MaxRwinRcvd: 49640 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1380 MinRTO: 240 MinRTT: 40 MinRwinRcvd: 49640 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 2328 PktsOut: 4520 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 107520 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 34 SampleRTT: 80 SmoothedRTT: 80 X_Sndbuf: 107520 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 9652667 SndLimTimeCwnd: 371154 SndLimTimeSender: 48907 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 6098220 SndLimBytesCwnd: 139380 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 178880 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 146786 Duration: 10073332 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 3 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 1 link: 10 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 137.02 loss: 0.000001000 avgrtt: 76.84 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0000 rwintime: 0.9583 sendtime: 0.0049 cwndtime: 0.0368 rwin: 0.3787 swin: 0.8203 cwin: 0.3790 rttsec: 0.076838 Sndbuf: 107520 aspd: 7.91610 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.71<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.95>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.03>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.71<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [137.02>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.95>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0049=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.95>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.03>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] estimate = 137.02 based on packet size = 10Kbits, RTT = 76.84msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 137.02 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 10.67 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 48.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.92 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.93 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is 'Ethernet', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'

i get 11,500 on windows now and sometimes hits over 12,500 on 100 mb but now i want to speed up my gigabit lan if its possible. the fastest i hit was about 140 mb and i dont know about verizons test server cause it give off bad test results and duplex modes but it says( The theoretical network limit is 137.02 Mbps ) so that seems accurate. i am gonna mess with it tomorrow and see if i can tweak cablenut and mess with some other things to get past 140 mb.

i have no idea

should i change mine? i dont really know what it does but mine was like this already

always good to learn something new

says on this site that vdsl might not be able to do it but vdsl 2 can do 3 hd streams. Qwest for instance has about 40,000 customers who are using VDSL technologies. But eventually if they want to offer true triple play with high-definition streams, they will eventually have to migrate to VDSL2 technology which can handle three HDTV streams with relative ease. (Three HD streams at the very least because at present average American home has 3.1 televisions.) Of course there is that whole issue of US homes being too far from the Central office. The good news is that VDSL2 is going to be backward compatible with ADSL, ADSL2 and VDSL. read the sites that he posted above .

adsl is limited to about 1 mb up and 8 mb down. i dont know about adsl 2 but i think its faster speeds at further distances. gonna look for it to see