ACEKILL Posted October 23, 2005 CID Share Posted October 23, 2005 Wow MGLC ur so lucky u have way bettter than i do for cox oklahoma sucks i wish we had a better package i pay 40 bucks a month for this dang ur lucky :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4022 Kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 491 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sun Oct 23 2005 14:07:01 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 72X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.09 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 9.77 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BV2RHCPGX :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 545 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 67 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Tue Aug 16 16:50:19 CDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 15.28 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 4.21 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TSREQ1H2K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
va757 Posted October 26, 2005 CID Share Posted October 26, 2005 Yeah, I live in newport news virginia, and am getting the cox 15/2 tomorrow, can't wait! wayyy better then verizon right now, atleast till fios comes out, i'll post my speeds tom. soon as I get it hooked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
risky Posted October 26, 2005 CID Share Posted October 26, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5177 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 632 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Oct 27 2005 05:07:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 92X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.62 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 41.72 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H4P0YR6JN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dn0 Posted October 27, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 27, 2005 Yeah, I live in newport news virginia, and am getting the cox 15/2 tomorrow, can't wait! wayyy better then verizon right now, atleast till fios comes out, i'll post my speeds tom. soon as I get it hooked up. Welcome to the forum va757. Please do give us some speed test results when your up and running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted November 29, 2005 CID Share Posted November 29, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9375 Kbps about 9.4 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1144 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Nov 29 2005 09:03:06 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 167X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.9 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 153.93 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1UZKDOSAE :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1047 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 128 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Nov 29 2005 09:02:46 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 98.67 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YB1LQ4HM5 I was bored so I posted my speed results... Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and Settings>ping testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 52ms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 This is the new upgrade in Kansas. Love the new speeds. I'm on primere 9/1. Way to go Cox. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 11553 Kbps about 11.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1410 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 01 2005 13:27:07 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 206X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.73 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 211.99 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0DOIFJVY7 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1138 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 139 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Thu Dec 01 2005 13:32:25 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 20X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 7.37 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 115.94 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-72BLNUD9W Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i2d | ScruFFy | Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 wait for more people to get that service , lol , then post your speeds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 wait for more people to get that service , lol , then post your speeds Been on the 5/768 package for three years and have always gotten over the cap. I am not too worried that its going to slow down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i2d | ScruFFy | Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 lol , you have not been on the 5/768 for 3 yrs. It wasn't even available in 2002. The highest they offered was like 4/384. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 lol , you have not been on the 5/768 for 3 yrs. It wasn't even available in 2002. The highest they offered was like 4/384. Well it may not have been the actual 5/768 plan but for the three years I've never been below 5 but a few occasions. Thats what I really meant. And my upload was never lower than 512. Still the point is it has never slowed and I still don't expect it to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i2d | ScruFFy | Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 You know as they begin to upgrade to higher speeds and considering that your line is shared , you are going to slow down when more people get the upgrade and wont have those speeds anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 I live in a small town and the people that live around me don't even know what the internet is. I know a tech guy here and this node has the fewest people on it around here, so I think I'll be OK. Your right though the more people on your node the slower it will get. Not trying to start a fight here, it's just that I seem to be in the best case scenario as far as speed goes. After all I'm just glad they did the upgrade since there is no comp. around here. But if the entire network gets more people on it then yes I will slow down with the rest of them (fingers crossed). It has been a good ride so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i2d | ScruFFy | Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 Ya , dont get me wrong those speeds are good , but you are real lucky in your case to live in a place where so little people use their internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 You are right about that, and I'm thankful. Parents live in K.C. and roadrunner sucks up there. I would rather have a 5/2 as I would like more up, the download increase is just a bonus to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete424 Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 Hulioni, Where are you located? I am in Andover and I don't believe my speeds are anywhere what yours are. I am on the Premier tier and I know we were supposed to get a bump yesterday to the 9 down, 1 up but I haven't tested my speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete424 Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8524 Kbps about 8.5 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 1041 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Dec 2 11:43:33 CST 2005 Bottom Line:: 152X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.98 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 115.25 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GW9QHT7VB :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1021 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 125 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Dec 2 11:45:13 CST 2005 Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 8.19 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.07 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LV5TAGNJF I have seen a pretty big jump. I was always in the mid 5500s with 760s up before. So I am pleased. Thanks Cox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hulioni Posted December 2, 2005 CID Share Posted December 2, 2005 Hulioni, Where are you located? I am in Andover and I don't believe my speeds are anywhere what yours are. I am on the Premier tier and I know we were supposed to get a bump yesterday to the 9 down, 1 up but I haven't tested my speeds. I'm on the far west side of Hutchinson. I'm sure that this is just temporary thing (in the mid 10's) and once they are up and running a few days, weeks, I'll be back down to just over 9. I seem to have always been at least .5 over the cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jeffwalker9999 Posted December 3, 2005 CID Share Posted December 3, 2005 North Las Vegas 5 meg service :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4139 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 505 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sat Dec 3 02:34:46 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.03 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 4.44 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5T0M9D4J2 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 755 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 92 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Sat Dec 3 02:37:40 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.13 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 33.39 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6ZJGNEKIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerstoren Posted December 7, 2005 CID Share Posted December 7, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9240 Kbps about 9.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1128 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Dec 7 02:59:03 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 165X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.91 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 132.75 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HW6K37DI2 Cox San Diego-92119 Premier is now 9000/1024 Any Questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHeeZy Posted December 15, 2005 CID Share Posted December 15, 2005 i got cox in cleveland and its smokin now that they upgraded :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7708 Kbps about 7.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 941 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 15 00:42:12 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 138X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.09 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 91.46 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FGA9270O8 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7671 Kbps about 7.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 936 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 15 00:45:40 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 137X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.09 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 90.54 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PN0J8YB4E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jeffwalker9999 Posted December 15, 2005 CID Share Posted December 15, 2005 Las Vegas 5/384 Service 4.2 to 4.9 megs is the average speed I get at times do get rated speed ,but almost never :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4767 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 582 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Dec 15 14:24:43 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.76 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 18.11 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-40XNDSFW5 Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 1073725440 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 14 bits (scale factor of 28) Unscaled Receive Window = 65535 have tweaked via cablenut , but no major improvement http://www.linux-ipv6.org/linux-test-en/ is where I got some of my settings from and Van B his cablenut tweaks are cool and do make a difference http://forums.speedguide.net/showpost.php?p=1122773&postcount=4 for tos settings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerstoren Posted December 16, 2005 CID Share Posted December 16, 2005 I'm on the far west side of Hutchinson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerstoren Posted December 16, 2005 CID Share Posted December 16, 2005 Mid 10's sound good to me, I'd kill for that. Great bandwidth! My best speeds come at around 5-6am pacific. otherwise forget it, it's going to be "less" (or downright pathetic at times even) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHeeZy Posted December 17, 2005 CID Share Posted December 17, 2005 [shadow=red,left]CLEVELAND, OH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jeffwalker9999 Posted December 21, 2005 CID Share Posted December 21, 2005 Location Post Please When Posting Las Vegas North 5/768 $49.95 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3928 Kbps about 3.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 479 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Dec 21 07:15:31 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 70X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.14 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 96.77 % of your hosts average (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CBWJ9VEF7 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 717 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Wed Dec 21 07:16:39 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.64 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.49 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4S9ACRN5L Downstream Value Frequency 675000000 Hz Signal to Noise Ratio 36 dB QAM 256 Network Access Control Object ON Power Level -2 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading Upstream Value Channel ID 2 Frequency 24900000 Hz Ranging Service ID 6433 Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/s Power Level 38 dBmV 7 D511.0 Retrieved DHCP .......... SUCCESS TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 816.66Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.24Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts