VanBuren Posted September 30, 2004 CID Share Posted September 30, 2004 Man i just tested it, first when i saw the fps i thought my pc was goin to give up lol FPS between 0-15 hehe I thought 3dmark03 was hard to run ........ anyway here is my score After i seen ppl posting scores at other forums, i think i should be happy consider my mobo, RAM, and CPU hehe VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted September 30, 2004 CID Share Posted September 30, 2004 yeah that is fairly normal... you are now competing with 6800's and the x800. so those are the base line pretty much... Not bad... I might benchmark mine tonight if i have time... 9600 pro mobility flavor.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted September 30, 2004 CID Share Posted September 30, 2004 Ima have ta hit up the forum with my score too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted October 8, 2004 Author CID Share Posted October 8, 2004 Any one tested it? If so post your score and spec VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted October 8, 2004 CID Share Posted October 8, 2004 I got 1266 on my 9600pro mobility... the graphics are awesome! but it sucks watching them at 7fps.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Ho Posted October 8, 2004 CID Share Posted October 8, 2004 1334. I've no clue where that stands with Radeon 9600 pro's, but I thought it'd be better than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted October 9, 2004 CID Share Posted October 9, 2004 that is good! about the same as mine... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Ho Posted October 9, 2004 CID Share Posted October 9, 2004 Cool! I'll check and see if my drivers are up. Would that help score better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
organ_shifter Posted October 9, 2004 CID Share Posted October 9, 2004 This is, by far, the most stressful test that I've put my system/video card through. The graphics were beautiful nonetheless. -Shifter- Specs: CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ [email protected] FSB 213x10.0Multiplier | Motherboard: MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R (MS-6702) Cool'N'Quiet | RAM: Kingston KHX3200A/512DDR x2 400MHZ (Hyper X PC3200) | Hard Drive: IBM 40G HDD 7200RPM | DVD-Rom: JLMS XJ-HD166S 16x | Burner: Liteon LTR-52x32x52 CD-RW | Video Card: ATI Radeon 9500Pro 128MB DDR-Flashed with 9500_33.BIN 340 Core/310 Memory | Cooling Fan: Zalman CNPS7000A-Cu Heatsink/Fan 92mm 2400rpm Fan Mate 11 | Power Supply: Antec Performance 480W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted October 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted October 15, 2004 dern i need an upgrade Found these result aswell, kinda amazing.... 3dmark05 http://www.tweak.dk/3dmark05/se.php 3dmark03 http://www.tweak.dk/3dmark/se.php 3dmark01 http://www.tweak.dk/3dmark2001/se.php VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
organ_shifter Posted October 15, 2004 CID Share Posted October 15, 2004 Those marks are insane!!! WOW!! I need an upgrade also. Too bad it won't be until my tax return in January . I wanna go total PCI Express. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted October 15, 2004 CID Share Posted October 15, 2004 PIC-E isnt all than impressive yet.. the graphics are cool but that is about it.. We have yet to max out AGP on the current system.. I think it is a ploy for the motherboard manufactures to get more money out of us all.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luwigie Posted October 15, 2004 CID Share Posted October 15, 2004 PIC-E isnt all than impressive yet.. the graphics are cool but that is about it.. We have yet to max out AGP on the current system.. I think it is a ploy for the motherboard manufactures to get more money out of us all.. It is true that PCI-E isn't all that impressive for graphics implementations (yet) as AGP 8x seems to be fast enough to not be a bottle neck. However, gigabit ethernet seems to be an interesting implementation of this new interface. The full theoretical bandwidth of a gig connection should all but fill up a regular PCI bus, dragging anything else that is shareing the bandwidth to a crawl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted October 26, 2004 CID Share Posted October 26, 2004 Thought you might like to see this.. they cheated some what but still http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20041025_160927.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted November 9, 2004 CID Share Posted November 9, 2004 i know this topic is old, please dont smite me but i took that test a while back on my extreme gaming machine (haahah) and i got 687 " Got Pwnd??" :::edit::: and that was on 3dmark03 ....lmao wait till i do 3dmark05 >=D :::edit :::: heres 05 lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted November 10, 2004 CID Share Posted November 10, 2004 I beat most of you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted November 11, 2004 CID Share Posted November 11, 2004 i know this topic is old, please dont smite me No one has been smited on this forum for a long time so I think your safe....lol Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakop92 Posted November 11, 2004 CID Share Posted November 11, 2004 Where can i get the program? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted November 11, 2004 CID Share Posted November 11, 2004 I beat most of you spff.. didnt beat me by a long shot.. oh, and dont be jelous because my computer is pimptastic... dont hate.. appreaciate! score 168.... "pwnd" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice Posted November 11, 2004 CID Share Posted November 11, 2004 Where can i get the program? www.madonion.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakop92 Posted November 11, 2004 CID Share Posted November 11, 2004 thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hahn Posted November 14, 2004 CID Share Posted November 14, 2004 There's no point in me even posting my '05 score. I scored a little over 2000 on '03 not to long ago, so one can only imagine how pitiful that would be. I will be building myself a new gaming pc in a month or two though. I'll be getting an AMD Athlon 64 3500+, Abit AV8 mobo, 500 or 550 watt PSU, the overclocked-out-of-the-box Asus 6800 Ultra, etc. I'll post both my '03 and '05 scores once I have it built. I preordered Guild Wars, the MMORPG, so I can participate in the beta testing each month before its launch in February. It skips around so much on my 1.6 P4 and Asus FX5600 that it's hard to tell what's going on at times. I can't wait to see it once I build the new PC. Heck, I'll want to play all my old games just so I can see them at maxed out settings with a smooth fps. Are any of you playing the the Guild Wars betas? Post your in-game name and feel free to add 'The Hahn' to your buddy list in game if you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 14, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 14, 2004 I'll be getting an AMD Athlon 64 3500+' date=' Abit AV8 mobo, 500 or 550 watt PSU, the overclocked-out-of-the-box Asus 6800 Ultra, etc.[/quote'] Thats a good deal, i will also go for a 3500+ next time i upgrade Im still stuck on a AMD 1700+, but i bought a Fx 5900 Ultra a few months ago, and need AGP 8x, so Intel is out of the picture for me. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hahn Posted November 14, 2004 CID Share Posted November 14, 2004 If you're into gaming at all, AMD chips are definitely the way to go. I've seen benchmark after benchmark prove it. The 64 3500+ actually beat out Intel Extreme Edition chips in most game benches. But, if you're into number crunching and and serious multitasking, the hyperthreading on Intel chips and large cache on the EE's have AMD beat. It still isn't anything signifigant enough for me to go with them though. This will be the first AMD chip I've ever bought, and I feel I'll be happy with it. The 3500+ is the best bang for your buck as far as I can tell. I think it's running a little under $280 right now from reliable resellers, and it can keep up with and surpass many top-end chips. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 14, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 14, 2004 From www.tomshardware.com very good deal, compared to what the other CPU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.