ROM-DOS Posted September 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 25, 2005 Turned off 'FireWall' ~ here's what I got ~ PLEASE EXPLAIN ~ Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 25, 2005 CID Share Posted September 25, 2005 ROM-DOS :I did this test at a different NDT site because its the only one that gives results in Mb/s when the results are below 1 Mb/s.as you can see much slower than yours. TCP/Web100 Network Configuration Tester v5.1.1 click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 0.12Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 0.11Mb/s You are connected to a 100 Mbps Full-Duplex link I don't know how to explain all the results in the NDT test.I use it mostly for a speed test. The 2 results are upload & download speed.I use it for the RTT since my ISP blocks ping it gives me an indication of latency.It also reports packet loss. If you want to try what I beleive is the largest possible RWIN(for fun) At least I couldn't get the analyzer test below to give me the unscaled Receive Window on anything larger.I think in XP you need to change it in these 3 cablenut settings for it to work. DefaultReceiveWindow =65781760 GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize=65781760 TcpWindowSize=65781760 https://www.speedguide.net/ TCPIP Analyzer MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 65781760 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 10 bits (scale factor of 20) Unscaled Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2631270.4 kbps (328908.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1052508.16 kbps (131563.52 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 55 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 26, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 [move]OMG [/move] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 538 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 66 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Sep 26 01:37:36 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB download in 15.52 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 589.74 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-REOSW2CBL This is one for the Records! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted September 26, 2005 CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 [move]OMG [/move] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 538 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 66 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Sep 26 01:37:36 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB download in 15.52 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 589.74 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-REOSW2CBL This is one for the Records! how? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted September 26, 2005 CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 freaky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 26, 2005 CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 ROM-DOS : I would like to know some of your other system settings. What modem do you use? What settings have you made to your modem Like extra string settings Or other ? Could you put in a screen shot of your Cablenut Adjuster(Manual tweak screen)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 26, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 PCI SoftV92 Modem with a Conexant Systems Driver ~ CXT ~ version 7.16.0.51 COM 4 ~ Port Speed 115200 No Extra initialization commands WindowsXp SP2 AMD Athlon XP 2500+ 512 Ram I switched from Modem Hardware compression(turned it off) to Software compression(windowsXP automatically does this for you) and went from around 20-30 % Hardware Comp. to over 50% with Windows Software Comp. the other thing I've noticed when downloading from ~ let's say ~ Microsoft - is my speed starts out at 160+Kbps then slowly keeps dropping down to around 10-6Kbps. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 82 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 10 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Sep 26 15:39:54 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 102.4 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 5.13 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-46IO0EGFM how do you up-load a screen shot of Adjuster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netmasta Posted September 26, 2005 CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 how do you up-load a screen shot of Adjuster? Make sure that window is active (in front) then press Alt + Printscreen. Then open Paint, press Ctrl + V and Save As... a .jpg. Note: Alt+ PrntScrn takes a screen shot of just the current window. To get the whole screen just press PrntScrn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 26, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 [move]what's the print screen button [/move] anyway, this is the best I can do in copying Adjuster CableNut Custom Settings File 128480 5000000 40960 1 1 1 100 0 240 1 320 2 40960 100 6400 80 15040 1460 1 1460 1280 30 32 0 1024 87600 1 8 1 4 0 128 87600 0 8000 6 16384 92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netmasta Posted September 26, 2005 CID Share Posted September 26, 2005 Print screen aka 'PrntScrn' is to the right of the F12 key right above the 'insert' key. It could be in a totally differend place if you're on a laptop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 27, 2005 CID Share Posted September 27, 2005 ROM-DOS: netmasta's Instructions are pretty good.My print screen button also has Sys Rq on it it is between F12 & scroll lock button.If Ctrl + V doesn't work for you Left click on the white screen in paint then use edit & paste then save as .jpg.Save to MY Pictures. Then when you post at testmy select additional options at the bottom of the post screen then Browse to MY Pictures & click the screen shot then post.Paint is in StartPrograms Accessories Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriRan Posted September 27, 2005 CID Share Posted September 27, 2005 hey ROM-DOS this is completely off topic but i see your having the same problem i was having on my old pc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 27, 2005 CID Share Posted September 27, 2005 ROM-DOS : I have my modem set to software even made sure the com port was set to soft in win.ini.I use com 3 but thats just a slot change & shouldn't make a difference if there is no resource conflict.The NDT shows your window scaling on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 28, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 28, 2005 cholla: I reset my CN Adjuster and turned off about ten services I had running Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 28, 2005 CID Share Posted September 28, 2005 ROM-DOS : your speed still looks good there sure is a lot of difference in the 2 cablenut screen shots.Odd that you get good speed both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 29, 2005 ROM-DOS : your speed still looks good there sure is a lot of difference in the 2 cablenut screen shots.Odd that you get good speed both ways. yeah, I'm just afraid if I didn't use CableNut ~ my speeds wouldn't be so good ~ lol :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 118 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 14 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Sep 29 05:13:14 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 73.14 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 59.46 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DKI8NM6TO maybe I'll clear my Adjuster Settings and reboot and to see 'the difference' - if any? ~ it would be funny if my 'Settings' didn't really make a difference ~ lol ~ I really think it has to do with all the Registry 'tweaks' I've done. ~ . . .but, I still think I have alot of unnesesary 'network' services running in the background? It is amazing, though! ~ ...everytime I disable something ~ I think - is that the one that's helping my speed ~ lol My theory is that ~ Windows Explorer is just 'One' Window with multible 'views' (and way too much crap) ~ including IE ~ so what really matters is how fast you can get your system ~ running 'Windows' ...and that's alot of Registy tweaking and maintianing a clean 'system' I use 'System Mechanic 5 Professonal' to clean, tweak and maintain everything on my computer ~ it's absolutly the 'best' ~ and now to do that Defrag ~ I've been updating all my 'programs' and general 'house cleaning' [move][move] [/move] [move] [/move] [move] [move] [/move][/move][/move] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 29, 2005 I tested three times without any settings in CableNut ~ Adjuster all three were the same. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 52 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 6 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Sep 29 10:57:27 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 170.67 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 71.23 % of your hosts average (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H0FTQN7J9 just found my 'Cablenut Settings Definitions: text' I'm gonna try adding one setting at a time and test . . .I have a feeling that maybe only around 10 or so settings really have an impact on connection speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 29, 2005 CID Share Posted September 29, 2005 ROM-DOS: I agree with the clean lean system.When you are done testing cablenut post a screen shot of the leaned down one.when you did it without settings in cablenut it probably used the windows defaults. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 30, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 30, 2005 I'm wondering if my speeds are in due to my browser? I just started using Avant Browser a few weeks ago and I just up-dated - made a new skin and did a download test here :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 121 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 15 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Sep 29 18:09:46 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 68.27 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 63.51 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-EVQHWGK2B [move]Avant Browser is the fastest web browser on Earth [move] [/move][/move] http://www.avantbrowser.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted September 30, 2005 CID Share Posted September 30, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 64 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 8 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Sat Sep 24 10:31:05 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 128 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 20.75 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-75HXCYR0U thats a great dial-up speed, how much do you pay for that.... :haha: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted September 30, 2005 CID Share Posted September 30, 2005 ROM-DOS: I've never tried the Avant I read about it some probably a year ago.I already have IE of course & Fire Fox so I haven't decided to add another browser to my OS but if that iss the reason for your speed I would try it.What happens if you test with IE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilNightHawk3 Posted September 30, 2005 CID Share Posted September 30, 2005 Do a tracert to Testmy.net and do a ping test to , doubt your dial up is good and you probably have google accelerator , plus dial up is crap and your not going to hit above 64k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted September 30, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 30, 2005 ROM-DOS: I've never tried the Avant I read about it some probably a year ago.I already have IE of course & Fire Fox so I haven't decided to add another browser to my OS but if that iss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 1, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 1, 2005 all right ~ I think I've got it figured out. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 173 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 21 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Sep 30 23:32:14 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB download in 48.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 121.79 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3284YZOCD check out this link: Modem Tweaks By James Sonne http://www.webnovice.com/dec00/modemoverclock.htm and follow it ~ the truth is out there ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 6, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 6, 2005 . . . just getting better [move][move]:::.. [/move] Download Stats[move] ..:::[/move][/move] Connection is:: 199 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 24 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 5 19:26:07 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB download in 42.67 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 142.68 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-C6KHO017A [move][move]WOO[/move] [move]HOO[/move][/move] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.