-
Posts
10,127 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
547 -
Speed Test
My Results
Everything posted by CA3LE
-
/happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> HAPPY BIRTHDAY! /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' />
-
hoodlegend, make sure (if you have a firewall) to take down your firewall. This should clear up any problems.
-
I think people down vote her because they are jealous -- she has a 7.654 and I have a 7.672. How the hell can I have a slighly higher rating than her?... injustice I tell you...
-
haha, fuck no...
-
yeah, http://www.facethejury.com/profile.asp?user_name=_catie_
-
Already have one under [more] :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: "I'm not worthy.. I'm not worthy.. " Added that a while ago so that people can express their non-worthiness to Van
-
This isn't efnet bro Anyway, threats to flood with a bot... glad I didn't grant you mod ~~ unleash your botnet... shit man, I have you logged in too many ways to count -- I hope you were kidding. And if you would have read what I wrote, I didn't DENY you... I told you that you haven't been with us long enough AND you would have to be voted in. But if you want to leave........ later I guess
-
bah ha ha ha ha ha ha... where did you find that... hehe I think I was actually yawning in that picture Speaking of PiMP... here is a picture when I was working for Cox. I was their best sales person in turn making our team the best sales team, so to rub it in the other teams face I came to a meeting dressed like a pimp and everyone else wore a pimp hat. I even had a gold tooth and a toothpick. I even slapped a couple people (playing around of course) --- "Where's my glass of water bitches..."
-
Here is the equasion to figure out MAXIMUM daily throughput. (speed in KB/s * 60 * 60 * 24) To get monthly max it would be (speed in KB/s * 60 * 60 * 24 * 30) If the only number you have to work with is speed in Kbps use this formula ((speed in Kbps / 8.192) * 60 * 60 * 24) For instance a 100 Mbps line would work as follows [100Mbps = 100000 Kbps] ---- ((100000 / 8.192) * 60 * 60 * 24) = 1054687500 KB/day or 1029968 MB/day or 1005 GB/day So given your current speed average of 594 KB/s * 60 (seconds in a minute) * 60 (minutes in an hour) * 24 (hours in a day) = 51321600 KB/ 24 hours or 50118 MB/ 24 hours or 48.94 GB/ 24 hours Should I add this and many more options to my conversion calculator???
-
Awww man.. the best I could do was 5.5 Mbps or 675 Kbps --
-
I'm running good :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5788 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 707 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 10:54:24 GMT-0700 (US Mountain Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 103X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.45 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 75.02 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-IMPXHE5S6 C:Documents and SettingsCA3LE>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 11 ms 10 ms 7 ms 10.114.128.1 3 10 ms 8 ms 12 ms ip68-2-6-41.ph.ph.cox.net [68.2.6.41] 4 8 ms 10 ms 9 ms 68.2.13.202 5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 68.2.13.114 6 11 ms 8 ms 10 ms 68.2.13.9 7 11 ms 12 ms 10 ms 68.2.13.5 8 25 ms 10 ms 12 ms 68.2.13.1 9 11 ms 14 ms 13 ms 68.2.14.37 10 10 ms 17 ms 13 ms chndbbrc01-pos0101.rd.ph.cox.net [68.1.0.164] 11 39 ms 25 ms 24 ms langbbrc01pos0401.r2.la.cox.net [68.1.1.228] 12 33 ms 33 ms 32 ms paltbbrj01.r2.pt.cox.net [68.1.0.227] 13 36 ms 32 ms 35 ms 68.105.31.18 14 36 ms 36 ms 38 ms so-0-0-0.mpr4.pao1.us.above.net [64.125.27.82] 15 42 ms 44 ms 39 ms so-6-1-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.29.126] 16 79 ms 78 ms 79 ms so-2-2-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.46] 17 57 ms 57 ms 57 ms 64.124.79.77.theplanet.com [64.124.79.77] 18 55 ms 56 ms 55 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.29] 19 58 ms 58 ms 57 ms dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.67] 20 55 ms 58 ms 59 ms dsr2-1-v1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.7] 21 58 ms 75 ms 57 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18. 116.69] 22 56 ms 56 ms 59 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsCA3LE>ping -n 20 testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=46 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 57ms C:Documents and SettingsCA3LE> [/code] I must be on a good route...
-
23 Irish / German Phoenix Arizona
-
How do you get an animated avatar to work in forum profile?
CA3LE replied to cholla's topic in General Discussion
make sure the demensions are correct otherwise the server will download and resize the picture width x height == 120x100 max -
WHAT... hook that shit up! -- How much bandwidth? PM me
-
awww thanks
-
[FIX] Someones takin' alot of tests!
CA3LE replied to xs1's topic in Ideas to make testmy.net better?
It takes less space in my DB to leave this flat -
This topic has been moved to PHP. [iurl]https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=2427.0[/iurl]
-
[FIX] Someones takin' alot of tests!
CA3LE replied to xs1's topic in Ideas to make testmy.net better?
That the tests of people not logged in ~~ shows that everyone above that mark is faster than the site average. -
I don't think so... I get about 6 viruses in my email a day so I don't notice... my mail gets filtered like 10 times..
-
1Mbps !! Getting 4 Mbps...
-
question about differences between how FF and IE read code
CA3LE replied to Cobra's topic in General Discussion
I don't know what I did... but I fixed it... I just went through and changed a bunch of stuff that didn't look right and it's now fixed, I don't know exactly which thing I changed that fixed it though... -
question about differences between how FF and IE read code
CA3LE replied to Cobra's topic in General Discussion
FireFox is actually the browser that is displaying the correct information, why you see websites around the internet that look funky in FireFox is because there are webmasters out there that aren't coding to compliance... mainly because Internet Explorer made them lazy. Internet Explorer is the browser who re-formates code, IE cleans up code and displays it the way it thinks it should look... it actually doesn't do a bad job at this at all. IE most of the time looks cleaner, but it makes webmasters lazy... this isn't an open source approach so you will see that FireFox displays EXACTLY what it sees... though it doesn't go too far into compliance for instance <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> should actually be <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" /> That of course is if you were going to code 100% to compliance. I don't think any browser is going to make a big deal out of a little misformatted meta tag. ON TO YOUR PROBLEM...... I am pretty sure that your error lyes in your tables... I will look at them in a bit and post my findings