Jump to content

CA3LE

Administrator
  • Posts

    10,147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    561
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by CA3LE

  1. This topic has been moved to Graphics and Sigs. [iurl]https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1042.0[/iurl]
  2. Just like Skank_Ho's avatar
  3. Thank you, I do have this >> https://testmy.net/topic-1013 - You are right though, we should get a tweak section that is easier to navigate. And yes, Van does know what's up
  4. Thank you, hope you stick around the forums for a while. Welcome to the site
  5. I used to have that back in the day. The site was a lot less popluar and I didn't bring in too much money. It may be a good idea now, I will think about it. Microwave was one of the few people that donated back in the day
  6. very nice
  7. Yep... not a bug, sorry. There is an option for SmarTest but you really don't have a choice. If you are going to fast the test will forward you anyway.
  8. I am running better than normal actually.
  9. Depends on their line speed. My server is 100 Mbps both ways, I can support quite a few people concurrently without a problem. Right now though, server load is pretty low if you take into consideration my line speed and the hardware my server has. Don't worry, right now it's not an issue.
  10. That is for the entire site... not all testing at once... and it's not live, it's for the past 20 minutes or so.
  11. Why thank you, I always love the feedback -- you guys are as much a key to the success of this site as I am, you all make a huge contribution to the content of this site. Thank you everyone!
  12. Yea it could have been someone else on the same ip.. if it's a school connection it's not uncommon. Nice speed though
  13. that's a nice excuse to get drunk in a shitty situation.. lol
  14. nice connection... but you have another test at only 31 Jan 2005 Download 14399 Kbps or 1757.69 KB/sec 12160-KB 11646431 5FD04UEIW and it only averaged 6883 Kbps today... so it's fast, but those results are a fluke
  15. Please read post at https://testmy.net/topic-2110
  16. CA3LE

    Evil

    I did find a couple records for that 2 records found [table] [tr] [td]*[/td][td]Date*********[/td][td]Test_Type**[/td][td]Test_Score*[/td][td]Test_Size****[/td][td]COMP_ID******[/td][td]User_Name[/td][td]User_Host[/td][td]Affiliate[/td][td]Test_ID****[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td][/td][td]14 Dec 2004[/td][td]Download[/td][td]10696[/td][td]12160-KB[/td][td]1881662986682[/td][td]*[/td][td]aol.com[/td][td]*[/td][td]86QAB015I[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td][/td][td]22 Dec 2004[/td][td]Download[/td][td]10696[/td][td]12160-KB[/td][td]1395400859912[/td][td]*[/td][td]aol.com[/td][td]*[/td][td]3XW63G4IA[/td] [/tr] [/table] The bad news is your math is off... KB/s = Kbps/8.192 -- use the tool maaaan >> https://testmy.net/convert No results for 10953 though
  17. (by the way... if this post sounds redundant it's because it is..... this is a merged topic)
  18. That's some funny shit
  19. Yea thanks for the bug report.. that always helps me
  20. CA3LE

    Qwest

    Just want to explain interleaving for those who don't know. Quote from dslreports.com :: written by Justin ADSL modems commonly employ data Interleaving, which is a technique to increase resistance to noise bursts on a line. Interleaving "smears" out micro bits of data (interleaves them over time) so that a short burst of signal destroying noise can only remove part of any given larger block. Data blocks reserve some space for error-correction data.. which can salvage a partially damaged block. Interleaving increases the chance that noise on the line will only cause partial damage, not complete loss. Thats the good news. The down-side of Interleaving is that it increases latency! this is because your little (say) quake movement packet is smeared out over several packets before it can be fully sent or fully received. ADSL modems with typical Interleaving defaults can be 10-30ms behind in latency over equivalent speed SDSL modems... this means latency to any point for some ADSL modems can be at best 50ms! On the same setup, the aforementioned SDSL modems that typically add only 10ms. So for use of a nearby server, ADSL Interleaving can be the biggest single source of latency that you have. Unfortunately, there is little clear information supplied with, or available on-line, about what latency a given DSL modem or ISP connection has built-in. Some ADSL modems allow the user to turn off Interleaving, or turn it down to a narrow range, at the expense of possible data-loss on noisy lines. The Cisco 675, for example, has a full operating system inside it, and one of the attributes of the ether interface is Interleaving. See Randy Lutton's US West page). Some ISPs may be delivering this unit with Interleaving on, and some off. In other cases, it is the DSLAM (central office equipment) that has the Interleaving set, and this cannot be changed.
  21. Oh, I guess I should have read the name of this thread... I'm not in New England Anyway, I used to work for Cox and they have pretty strong service in all their markets. By the ywa.. already tested back up there... Just had a little speed bump in my connection for a minute :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5622 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 686 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Jan 30 2005 22:18:59 GMT-0700 (US Mountain Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 100X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.49 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-GLYSVTE3B
  22. My prediction was off... I thought there would be 720+ newmembers total for January. One more day left this month and we have gained 909 new members, yesterday alone was 56 new members, we should end at 950-970 -- man I was off --- Almost 2X our total users guys! Thank you everyone for making this site a success.
  23. CA3LE

    Qwest

    Damn, you are only supposed to have 128K upload... how the hell are you getting over 500 Kbps? Very niiiiiice
×
×
  • Create New...