xs1

Yea to be on or above cap is pretty much what we strive for. so - - 2- You

lol... my servers horrible..

You'll have to mention what your advertised speeds are.

Testmy + mirrors ; 1 run, each mirror Testmy.net :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5147 Kbps about 5.1 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 628 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 92X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.63 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.39 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0G7VWCKOR Bafserv :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4590 Kbps about 4.6 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 560 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.bafserv.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 82X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.83 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 14.49 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5ZP01SKC3 ^ Editors speed choice??? O_o... s1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4183 Kbps about 4.2 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 511 kB/s Tested From:: http://s1.camaroz.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 75X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 4.34 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BLF4DTSXN Damn california server piptech :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3569 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 436 kB/s Tested From:: http://dragon-jade.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 64X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.35 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 89.02 % of your hosts average (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-E9MWJT8DN Odysseus :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5901 Kbps about 5.9 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 720 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.menace-2-society.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 105X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.42 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 47.19 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F70TE4LVN Iv said it before, and ill say it again. I ody's server Moonlord :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1483 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 181 kB/s Tested From:: http://twistedpc.us Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.66 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 36.99 % of your hosts average (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0IEQXZ4TF wow.... xyther :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4563 Kbps about 4.6 Mbps (tested with 5248 kB) Download Speed is:: 557 kB/s Tested From:: http://s121815182.onlinehome.us Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 81X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.84 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 13.82 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-42GM3ZSIL

It was tested from "http://www.bafserv.com" , this site most of the time is pretty good, but is known for cached results. May be what happened to you.

hmm good post "Hctim". Iv been realy debating on buying a new modem since mines being a lil weird. Its beginning to loose network connection and / or have very slow speeds at times. Then when i power cycle it it seems to work just fine.. Well i dont want to have to reboot my modem every day So mabey ill look into the new modem afteraol.

As many have said, W2k3 in the internet aspect is basicaly the same as xp. If anything when i installed it ( datacenter edition) on my machine because i couldnt find compatable (updated) drivers, my internet was slower then usual. But either way... Unless your just using it as just that, a windows server... I wouldnt even mess with that operating system. Because theirs no gaming at all on thatr OS. Directx and all the video rendering is not avaliable, alot of times sound is not an option, hell microsoft even reccomends you pull the sound card if its not needed. I think a very stable, yet flexable OS to use for everyday useage would be windows 2000 professional.

Still looks good to me Tracing route to s121815182.onlinehome.us [217.160.226.92] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 5 ms 6 ms 10.102.192.1 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms atm5-0-644.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [24.92.7.42] 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 65.32.8.133 4 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms so-0-2-0-0.gar1.Tampa1.Level3.net [209.0.96.1] 5 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.124.9] 6 44 ms 44 ms 55 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [64.159.1.41] 7 44 ms 43 ms 44 ms ge-7-0.ipcolo1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.13] 8 50 ms 45 ms 46 ms 4.78.164.2 9 46 ms 45 ms 45 ms a0nycc2.gw-core-a.nyc.schlund.net [217.160.229.104] 10 46 ms 45 ms 45 ms perfora.net [217.160.226.92] Trace complete.

ooh sexy route to that server Tracing route to 1and1.com [217.160.232.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms 10.102.192.1 2 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms atm5-0-644.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [24.92.7.42] 3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 65.32.8.133 4 12 ms 7 ms 9 ms so-0-2-0-0.gar1.Tampa1.Level3.net [209.0.96.1] 5 38 ms 45 ms 8 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.124.9] 6 43 ms 44 ms 46 ms as-1-0.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [64.159.1.85] 7 43 ms 44 ms 44 ms ge-7-0.ipcolo1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.13] 8 45 ms 45 ms 45 ms 4.78.164.2 9 45 ms 46 ms 46 ms a0nycc1.gw-core-a.nyc.schlund.net [217.160.229.72] 10 54 ms 45 ms 46 ms www.1and1.com [217.160.232.1] Trace complete.

https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=2

Yay for burst?

Well.........I suppose you cant accuse them of using meat bi-products

rofl.. That was cute

Yea you prolly dont want to have them make a tracert WHILE downloading, php it makes loss and ping spikes.. without download. inging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 33ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 6 ms 5 ms 6 ms 10.102.192.1 2 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms atm5-0-644.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [24.92.7.42] 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 65.32.8.133 4 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms so-0-2-0-0.gar1.Tampa1.Level3.net [209.0.96.1] 5 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms so-7-0-0.gar2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.124.14] 6 30 ms 79 ms 8 ms so-7-0-0.mp2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.124.17] 7 32 ms 30 ms 30 ms ge-1-1-51.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.6] 8 33 ms 30 ms 33 ms 4.78.220.10 9 33 ms 31 ms 31 ms dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 10 33 ms 33 ms 34 ms dist-vlan-42.dsr2-2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 11 34 ms 34 ms 32 ms dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 12 63 ms 32 ms 34 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 13 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. With download Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=47 Request timed out. Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 38ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 15 ms 11 ms 11 ms 10.102.192.1 2 13 ms 17 ms 15 ms atm5-0-644.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [24.92.7.42] 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 65.32.8.133 4 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms so-0-2-0-0.gar1.Tampa1.Level3.net [209.0.96.1] 5 7 ms 9 ms 11 ms so-7-0-0.gar2.Tampa1.Level3.net [4.68.124.14] 6 34 ms 9 ms 39 ms as-2-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.3.217] 7 40 ms 38 ms 40 ms ge-1-1-53.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.70] 8 41 ms 38 ms 40 ms 4.78.220.10 9 33 ms 43 ms 31 ms dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 10 35 ms 33 ms 33 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 11 34 ms 39 ms 32 ms dist-vlan-42.dsr2-2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 12 37 ms 42 ms 39 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 13 41 ms 44 ms 39 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. And if we see ping spikes and loss, we'll figure other problems and waste time trying to help with it. Its better to just trace with a clean line. BTW lightnin, you can try lowering the TTL in cablenut a bit and see if that helps reach your cap.

Looks like roadrunner 5000/386 - Cablenut - Similar Problem - Solution in attached file.

1mbs = 100 kbs. 10 mbs = 1000 kbs. Theirs quite a difference..

gah.. the site will never stop growing! Now to just get some more of these folks POSTING and not just joining for the free statistics im number 5something.

... how the hell can you pull 10 down with 15 kbs upload...

Why do people feel the need to post their scores

Or mabey his engine was "turning" too quickly? GG Phill, GG. Anywho Iv personaly SEEN this reverse wheely done with an 85 mercury sable. "gravity" isnt holding this damn thing to the ground with 10 tons of force.... .. l [and] Speaking of it, a funny thing i saw the other day... Somebody with an older model toyota corolla... Every time they would hit a bump , not a BIG bump mind you, but just a dip in the road would do it, their drivers side rear wheel would literaly "hop". once it came off the ground ( not alot, but still noticable. ) I was scared to drive behind them

Ok..... deffinatly not what i thought this thread was about..

lmao even verizon dsl has beaten our uploads.... Falling behind..

Basik thats.... wtf! Im jealous lol. 6.4 on a 5 mb connection? My only thought would be that cox sets the cpa higher, therefore burst needs a real large file to kill any chance of burst. Ill pm you a link to try, real real big file and repost and lets see! !

Amazing talent.. Even more amazing how he finds the time for that type of thing .

The lowest i can remember was $1.50 a gallon. ... But then again i dont remember much so...