dlewis23

fryed boards will still usually turn on.

is it a switching power supply, that says it will work with 220?

The memory might be "incompatible" with the board. Who makes the ram? Or its just a bad board.

Now thats a CPU cooler

Any one got lower then 11 hops traceroute to testmy.net (75.125.181.200), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1) 1.536 ms 1.069 ms 0.991 ms 2 65.14.252.1 (65.14.252.1) 8.850 ms 8.226 ms 8.087 ms 3 65.14.254.93 (65.14.254.93) 8.947 ms 8.432 ms 8.714 ms 4 ixc01bct-ge-3-0.bellsouth.net (66.156.253.150) 8.552 ms 8.978 ms 8.827 ms 5 65.83.238.64 (65.83.238.64) 27.598 ms 25.801 ms 25.507 ms 6 pxr00chi-so-0-0-0.bellsouth.net (65.83.236.64) 45.542 ms 45.434 ms 45.037 ms 7 peer-02-ge-3-0-1-14.chcg.twtelecom.net (66.192.252.108) 44.091 ms 44.672 ms 45.235 ms 8 216-54-253-2.ev1.net.demarc (216.54.253.2) 60.358 ms 59.944 ms 61.018 ms 9 216-54-253-2.ev1.net.demarc (216.54.253.2) 61.980 ms 60.459 ms 59.757 ms 10 ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net (207.218.223.126) 60.856 ms 60.737 ms 63.525 ms 11 75.125.181.200 (75.125.181.200) 57.843 ms 56.885 ms 57.134 ms PING testmy.net (75.125.181.200): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=60.168 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=57.653 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=57.756 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=57.659 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=59.252 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=57.415 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=60.276 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=64.957 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=8 ttl=47 time=57.646 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=63.472 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=10 ttl=47 time=57.209 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=11 ttl=47 time=57.320 ms ^C --- testmy.net ping statistics --- 12 packets transmitted, 12 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 57.209/59.232/64.957/2.474 ms

I sent a message for a fix for that. Guess he hasen't gotten around too it just yet

Yea I have that same problem. And the stopping is what is causing the slow down. The connection speed doesn't stay consistent. And I think that is from having only 1gbps and not 10gbps connections to the datacenter.

Everyones route changed. The server is now hosted in Houston Texas, not Dallas Texas in the old EV1 DC. The connections to this DC are not quite as good as the ones in dallas. There i going to be a big difference in Ping times now because the distance for most people will be much grater.

Everything is probably gone now.

This is about the fastest I can get now.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 5265 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 643 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/12 - 9:29am Bottom Line:: 92X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.59 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 9.309 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 63.51 % faster than the average for host (bellsouth.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3IWTASKPD User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] EDIT: And my pings suck.... I use to get 40 - 45ms when the server was in dallas. donovan-lewiss-imac:~ dlewis23$ ping testmy.net PING testmy.net (75.125.181.200): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=57.912 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=62.804 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=61.672 ms 64 bytes from 75.125.181.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=56.926 ms ^C --- testmy.net ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 56.926/59.829/62.804/2.467 ms donovan-lewiss-imac:~ dlewis23$

Not a smart move. Windows XP will not and can not use the quad core correctly because its not really threaded. Download the vista sp1 beta and try that.

is the 10mbps offer, for business customers only currently?

Its all different because the apache max connections is too low I think. Some times it goes instantly others it hangs because the max connections allowed is too low. EDIT: posting this went fast, but doing the edit hanged

I sill have problems. Even the T1 i'm on right now sucks. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 634 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 77 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/11 - 9:29am Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.3 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 38.685 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 53.51 % faster than the average for host (116.217) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CI8MVJ1XG User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_1; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/523.10.6 [!]

You don't hold the fucking board in your hand while your blowing air on it. You leave it in the case, no need to take it out. My compressor would rip it out of your hand, and put it through a window

LOL And it works much better.

You will be fine. As long as you don't like drink it, or get it in your eye.. lol But this is the reason why you never ever use caned air on any electronic device. That stuff is really bad. Always use air from a compressor.

yea i wrote the wrong option. Its still too early, I was up too late

go to "tools" then "delete browser history" and empty temporary internet files.

Post your speedtest results with the new server, and if its close to what you got on the old server. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 4265 Kbps about 4.3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 521 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/08 - 8:21am Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.97 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 11.492 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 32.49 % faster than the average for host (bellsouth.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LTRFPD143 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] Its not quite what I got on the old server. But its getting better.

This topic has been moved to Off Topic Discussion. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=22248.0[/iurl]

I think its just one quad core. But with a dual core core its real easy to run of out power. I do it ever day

Its called intercity

Thats comcast for ya.

Because when you plug your HD Digital Cable Box to your tv with a Analog coax setup you loose about 1/2 the quality, and it goes from digital to analog. So its like watching regular analog tv. When you use the component or HDMI cable you get a full digital signal at full resolution.