dlewis23

It depends where I am. at home, i prefer glossy, And for most things glossy is better because colors look better At work i prefer matte because i don't want all of the overhead lights reflecting on my screen.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9487 Kbps about 9.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1158 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/09 - 7:08am Bottom Line:: 165X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.88 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 10.5 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 0.74 % faster than the average for host (uploadingit.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-00EWDT3KG User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

it sounds like a bad power supply but could be something wrong with windows registry You may want to get your windows disk and run the windows repair just to see if that fixes it.

adding a router will make no difference.

Nope. Your case is most likely a custom form factor and won't fit a standard motherboard. So that is out.

most likely it will not work

Very nice Christmas present did you get the matt or glossy screen?

Get some ram. at least go to 512mb, if not 1gb

both of these are good http://www.dell.com/content/products/category.aspx/inspnnb?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs http://www.dell.com/content/products/category.aspx/vostronb?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd Try to avoid vista as well. Both of those can come with XP

no your right, thats just a waste of money to get one for a page file. I have a 147GB one in the computer that i use for rendering at work and the thing is so loud it makes me not want to use it.

does she have a problem getting pictures from anyone else?

No it won't improve performance if you have another 7200rpm drive. If you had a 15,000rpm scis drive you might notice a difference when your using alot of your page file. If you have 2GB or more ram your really not using your page file very much.

Where did you read that at? it doesn't really matter where your page file is as long as there is enough space. The only reason people move the page file to another drive is because they think it will make things load faster but it really doesn't. especially when you move it from 1 7200rpm drive to another 7200rpm drive. Moving it can also cause more problems.

How did you do the updates? The best way is with yum update or up2date in the terminal. To fix it, the easiest would be to just reinstall.

Give parallels workstation a try, you could run it just as fast as if you were dual booting, if your processor as virtualization

a iPod Touch will. You can just drag the slider to the part of the song that you want.

Just use preview its already built in.

This topic has been moved to Off Topic Discussion. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21654.0[/iurl]

This topic has been moved to Off Topic Discussion. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21660.0[/iurl]

:haha: Your joking right?

KDE is much better the gnome. gnome is a bad half assed copy of OS X. KDE 4.0 looks really nice. What did you think of ubuntu? I really hate it, its just such garbage. I love SUSE but would never put it on for a webserver ill leave that to rhel.

lol i wish i could get 1/10 of the upload from your 20/20 to my house.

finally getting some very good upload speed results from tmn again :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 8619 Kbps about 8.6 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 1052 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/27 - 3:34pm Bottom Line:: 150X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 0.97 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.687 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 0.19 % faster than the average for host (uploadingit.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9F8KGXNHE User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 8595 Kbps about 8.6 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 1049 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/27 - 3:33pm Bottom Line:: 150X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 0.98 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.703 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (uploadingit.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UM5N2QOJG User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9501 Kbps about 9.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1160 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/27 - 3:32pm Bottom Line:: 166X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.88 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 10.484 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 1.32 % faster than the average for host (uploadingit.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N7KRA3LX2 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

The problem: YouTube. Some times its just going to be slow depending on how many people are on the server you are going too. Clear your cache and cookies, and try a different browser see if that helps.

for capture it doesn't, for encoding the video any program that is a name brand, like adobe premier, or quicktime will use all cores. Most of the free or cheap programs wont be threaded so they don't use all of the cores.