just-

van why didnt you try the one i recomended http://cemp1.switch.ch/network/performance/web100/tcpbw100.html

TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.0f click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 294.54Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.86Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem click START to re-test the download seems to be too small i think 2Mb file or something really not enough to be accurate its a shame Vanburen try the speed test from this website http://cemp1.switch.ch/network/performance/web100/tcpbw100.html way much bigger test file TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 295.46Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.90Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition exists: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplex click START to re-test

Blunted 2 man seriously 30MB download at home, do you ever download from anywhere and max out your connection that is so freking awsome man 2mb here u have 2mb upload

ok now with VanBuren Tewaks :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1901 Kbps about 1.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 232 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 3:04am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.41 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 12.891 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 93.51 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WXYRDGPA7 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1917 Kbps about 1.92 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 234 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 3:05am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.38 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 13.468 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 94.29 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-47BXTCYK1 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 252 Kbps about 0.25 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 31 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 3:04am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 33.03 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 18.85536 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 31.94 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PG723WXH1 Conclusion My dsl provider are not going to give me an extra kilo bit They are tight on bandwidth like Joe (Joe from friends) is tight with food. Note: i restarted my PC every time after applying a tweak to my registry

ok so now i have tried my OWN css file 2mb down 256kb up and latency 120ms :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1906 Kbps about 1.91 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 233 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:55am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.39 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 12.859 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 93.75 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-F6WRH4C3L :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1921 Kbps about 1.92 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 234 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:57am Bottom Line:: 34X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.38 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 13.438 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 94.49 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RV84U3DX0 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 251 Kbps about 0.25 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 31 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:56am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 33.03 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 18.90048 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 31.41 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AQVPKUM17 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 250 Kbps about 0.25 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 31 kB/s Tested From:: http://s2.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:58am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 33.03 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 18.97536 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.89 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0CPBFQVD3 HUHHHHHHH no diference at all so now i am going to try VanBuren magic settings we will see if he has some magic or not hehehe

Hi guys my isp is Plus.net and i live in the uk i am in the 2Mb down and 256kb up plan NO TWEAKS havent tweaked my connection and haven't posted my speed test in a while so here it goes before tweaking :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1918 Kbps about 1.92 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 234 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:39am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.38 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 12.781 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 94.3 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N1Z4I6ASR :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1903 Kbps about 1.9 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 232 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:43am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.41 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 13.563 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 93.56 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RP6FSE8H2 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 239 Kbps about 0.24 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 29 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:40am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 35.31 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 19.87488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 25.13 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7W9HCT354 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 250 Kbps about 0.25 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 31 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 2:42am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 33.03 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 18.9744 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.89 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-V2T8H1ON6

guys i dont know if you have noticed but check this out Team Ranking (incl. aggregate) 399 of 43858 yeah babby we made it to the top 400 well done every one

check it out http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/index.shtml?logo

vanburen do you know this is scot mills from bbc radio 1 i listen to that station every morning with chris moyles in the afternoon is scott mills, he is funny also that was an awsome prank thanks for sharing

huh i am having trouble with the maths so how much would it cost each gig ?

you climing up the rank quick

This topic has been moved to Online Gaming Discussion. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=13584.0[/iurl]

thanks i got one as my background now

had a look at come conroe machines at work yeah guys, all you read is true, they are kick ass start saving up

no matter how cheap they are can u imagine the shipping on it? well maybe u can just teleport it to your house

on friday i saw a guy turn a PC on a media center and fry the PSU it was set to 150V it was funny

ur on 100Mb van does ur isp still cap you 300G upload and download a month? shame u cant get more upload to the usa btw what is ur speed test against this miror http://www.testmy.net/o-mirror-Hispasoft

what is ur advertised ?

usa is the only place in the world i think with some competitiveness on the cable comapnies in the uk there is now only 1 major company since ntl bought telewest in portugal there is only 1 major company called netcabo the only place i know there is mroe then one MAJOR cable company is USA and u get nice speed lucky ucompanies

always nice to see some one from the uk danthevan welcome to the forum i guess you have been upgrade to the MAX product i am still waiting i am with plusnet are u with BT them selves or a reseller ?

yeah my isp is stingi about their bandwidth also i just cant get 100% of my advertised but i get close bte i moved this here because this turn out to be a more of how to make my dsl fast

This topic has been moved to Make it Faster.... [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=13531.0[/iurl]

ff way better then ie 7 even

huh can any one explain me if conroe is the name for the new intel server chips i dont really memorise all thise

resopalrabotnick yeah thats right but the problem is cause CPU are heating so much its getting difficult to cool them but i think things are about to change since manufacturers like Intel and amd mainly have realized that problem and now are trying to get more power with less heat.