just-

hi FiberOptic as you can see there is more to T Mobile then just the UK i dont think my area has been regraded but i think it takes up to 70something hours for it to kick in and u need to reboot ur modem of course

hi FiberOptic nice to see some one from the uk could you take a picture of it does it have a serial number on it sometimes looking for a partial part of a serial number on google u can find it

hi Sickness is this a t mobile hot spot in the uk ?

Page created in 0.125 seconds with 21 queries. still keeping it up on the quick side

you can PM Dark if you want but would be easier to share the problem in the forum so every one can help/avoid the problem next time isnt it

aarond this might be a bit of an over kill for your solution but you can use partition magic to find out that information also http://www.symantec.com/home_homeoffice/products/system_performance/pm80/index.html

i have to say at 1st i was shocked then i kind of liked the look and yeah i just noticed its a bit quicker Page created in 0.132 seconds with 21 queries. nice

thanks for the news http://www.testmy.net/articles/article-548

news has been posted http://www.testmy.net/articles/article-551

i think the problem is finding a V2 or a v3 this days richcornucopia do you know where people can find them? btw thanks swimmer this is awsome news

hi AW_Arnhem welcome to the forumz some one from netherlands are u a friend of rtb ?

from work :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2353 Kbps about 2.35 Mbps (tested with 7458 kB) Download Speed is:: 287 kB/s Tested From:: http://uploadgenie.com Test Time:: 2006/04/04 - 10:05am Bottom Line:: 41X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.57 sec Tested from a 7458 kB file and took 25.959 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 48.83 % faster than the average for host (intel.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NEOS8RCJK

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8533 Kbps about 8.53 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1042 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/04/04 - 10:00am Bottom Line:: 149X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.98 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 20.135 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 459.91 % faster than the average for host (intel.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5M4BDXA9N :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8609 Kbps about 8.61 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1051 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/04/04 - 10:01am Bottom Line:: 150X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.97 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 19.955 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 451.86 % faster than the average for host (intel.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-869O7VEZ0 fastest ever for me from the company waited for every one to go home sweet speed i only get this speeds downloading from apple microsoft or real player this server must be hosted in the same backbone where my company is hooked up too sweet

Team Ranking (incl. aggregate) 412 of 43521 almost under the 400 and i thought this would take us all year please guys join and help us out

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1018 Kbps about 1.02 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 124 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/04 - 8:11am Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 8.26 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 24.074 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 70.55 % of your hosts average (intel.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IG6QSLPXK

Tracing route to ip-68-178-211-84.ip.secureserver.net [68.178.211.84] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 17 ms 17 ms 19 ms lo0-plusnet.thn-ag1.plus.net [195.166.128.80] 3 22 ms 15 ms 17 ms gi0-2-0-303.pte-gw1.plus.net [84.92.3.177] 4 15 ms 17 ms 17 ms g8-0.er1a.lhr3.uk.above.net [209.249.11.97] 5 40 ms 17 ms 15 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.149] 6 89 ms 92 ms 94 ms so-7-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.31.186] 7 101 ms 102 ms 100 ms so-6-0-0.mpr2.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.27.62] 8 100 ms 100 ms 98 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.27.49] 9 116 ms 112 ms 112 ms so-3-3-0.mpr2.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.29.66] 10 109 ms 112 ms 110 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.61] 11 134 ms 133 ms 133 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.phx2.us.above.net [64.125.27.202] 12 133 ms 133 ms 135 ms 64.124.112.141.godaddy.com [64.124.112.141] 13 143 ms 141 ms 139 ms ip-64-202-161-53.secureserver.net [64.202.161.53 ] 14 141 ms 137 ms 137 ms ip-64-202-160-1.secureserver.net [64.202.160.1] 15 * ^C will try the speed test later now is a bad time to test it in the uk every one is online :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 522 Kbps about 0.52 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB) Download Speed is:: 64 kB/s Tested From:: http://uploadgenie.com Test Time:: 2006/04/03 - 12:49pm Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 16 sec Tested from a 1075 kB file and took 16.875 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 29.79 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O6ZJV485Q 2MB connection this is not acurate not because of the mirror its because of me :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 514 Kbps about 0.51 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 63 kB/s Tested From:: http://uploadgenie.com Test Time:: 2006/04/03 - 2:58pm Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 16.25 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 50.235 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 29.37 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZOE59380U

u will always have to use it on a dark room a bit wierd

Hi guys just wondering if every one has seen the new mirror in europe http://www.testmy.net/o-mirror-Hispasoft thank you Hispasoft :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1672 Kbps about 1.67 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 204 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/03/31 - 10:03am Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.02 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 15.437 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 93.93 % of your hosts average (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GEMKR87SV i have a 2MB link but its peak time for me in the uk now so that is not bad for me :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 202 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 25 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/03/31 - 10:04am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 40.96 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 23.42976 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Looks Great : 14.77 % faster than the average for host (plus.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RDY41KCPJ my upload is 256kb not a bad mirror at all

tlarm post some upload speeds also have u tried testing the download with a bigger file the 3MB one? http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=2992&st=st&ta=&top= also mate how much are u paying and what is ur isp?

good pick Swimmer you know the good shit hehehe that is one of the best one in my opinion out there but thats not the cheapest and its 4 bay not 2 bay richcornucopia a PC would be a tiny bit faster then a NAS device IF and this is a BIG IF, you set up linux and optimize for storage. all this NAS devices have inside them is a pc inside them but that pc is tailored made for handling storage / network traffic. so they will be a small power suppy with a litle mother board with a built in cpu like 200mhz or somethhing and 128MB of ram, just like a cheap PC. then they will put a webserver on it with a nice interface so you can control and manage or storage device. you can achieve all this with a pc, but don't forget that they will be using 100% of the time for a small home NAS a linux version that is very light to run and it will be all optimized for storage / network transfers. so unless you are damn good at linux and want to spend time researching in how to modify a linux version to best fit your network at home. for maybe 98% of the population they would be better off getting a NAS then buying a cheap pc and putting hard disk on it, since the linux version that comes with the nas will have been tailored and tested by people who know a lot more then what u do. this is my opinion i would buy a ready NAS i was given a PC - P4 3G 512MN of ram and a 40G sata i bought a raid controlloer and another 40G and i have windows running on it. i use it to remote desktop into it for some storage and to download torrentz over night, to run folding @ home. but i dont achieve the same performace in that machine that i would if i had a tailoed NAS as Swimmer said, a NAS will only do Storage and thats it i am thinking of buying a NAS now, because a pc with so many things running is not ideal to store information, you never know what can happen to it specially with WINDOWS on it. swimmer i have been looking seriously at that infrant one without HD and i also have been looking at getting the intel one yeah intel has a 4 bay home nas, trying to get it with a discount if i can if not i dont know which i will go for a cheap one in the market is the net gear one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16833122073 99bucks 3 out of 5 rating just SO and SO nothing special

Disclaimer: testmy.net and its mods are not responsible for any damage to hardware, software, systems, or bodily harm if you decided to attempt this. We strongly recommend that you attempt this only if you are confident in your computer skills and have some time to troubleshoot. As always, make sure that you make the propper backups before making any major system changes. Who is this guide for: For people that have wireless coverage in your house but you is too far from the main antenna or for some unknown reason you are not getting a good reception. How we are going to achieve improving you Wireless reception: The best thing you can do to extend the range of your WiFi signal is to add an external antenna with stronger gain to your system. [i]"Gain"[/i] defined from [url="http://www.dictionary.com"]www.dictionary.com[/url] is

for about 300 or 400 bucks you can buy a chasi just like if it was a dell pc then on top of that you need to buy the HD you can buy a nas with 2 Bay slot for 100+ bucks and a 4 bay Nas for about 300+ Bucks let me know if u want some more info i am really into Small Home NAS at the moment so just give me a shout and i can give u some brands and stuff

thank you for posting this article it is now in our new section which u can view here http://www.testmy.net/articles/article-528

i can find a ~600 or 650MB HARD DRIVE yeah a full 3.5" HD only 650MB working ATA