Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blunted 2

Anyone see this speed test yet?

Recommended Posts

Looks like its out of beta stage. That site gives me same results as I would get at speakeasy.net, also my upload speed never turns out to good on that site.

they did take it out of beta. but i dont think they changed anything, just moved the folder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dlewis had to look up the link, but a very close race. You both beat me and my satelite.  :rolleyes:

It's nice to beat people... but when you are beating someone on satellite did you really win?  ... poor satellite users... now they..... they always lose.  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe you should take your chair's leg off the network cable...

:haha: good point!

but since i have great speed against other sites, it must be a issue in the route or server.

most likely a server issue since i have no loss.

VanBuren :)

tracert www.ddance.fm

Tracing route to www.ddance.fm [193.16.154.138]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1

  2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226

.177.2]

  3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238]

  4    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1

19.233]

  5    1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  ge1-1.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.229]

  6    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26]

  7    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos6-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.13]

  8    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18

1]

  9    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  tenge9-2.br1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.24

6]

10    21 ms    21 ms    20 ms  netnod-ix-ge-a-sth-1500.cogent.com [194.68.123.1

55]

11    35 ms    35 ms    35 ms  p15-2.core01.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0

.129]

12    41 ms    41 ms    41 ms  p4-0.core01.dus01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.

177]

13    41 ms    41 ms    41 ms  p13-0.core01.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1

.125]

14    41 ms    41 ms    41 ms  t3-2.mpd01.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.2

38]

15    41 ms    41 ms    41 ms  internet-online-ams.demarc.cogentco.com [130.117

.241.234]

16    46 ms    56 ms    46 ms  ge-0-1-0-v189.rtr1.ams-rb.io.nl [213.196.0.1]

17    45 ms    45 ms    45 ms  fe0-v101.cr0.ams-rb.zylon.net [213.196.0.22]

18    41 ms    41 ms    42 ms  hutch.odx.nl [193.16.154.138]

Trace complete.

ping -n 50 www.ddance.fm

Pinging www.ddance.fm [193.16.154.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 193.16.154.138:

    Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 41ms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's harsh, CA3LE!  :haha:

Its actually true, with the 22,500 mile signal up and then again down. Sat will never win.  :(   No matter how fast it is.

We do fair better globally though.  :icon_thumleft:

No real long distance to England at all. Same 45,000 mile trip.

One other point I read recently also, if all systems around you were down. All it would take to get sat is a generator.  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if everyone agrees that testmy is more accurate then why are some people posting their speedtest.net scores in their sig?...just curious...doesn't make sense to me...posting inaccurate scores...and advertising for the site that did the test...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest philp

Don't take it personal, darlin'.  ;)

I think it's just the cool gauges they use that attract the guys. Makes it look like a sports car or something.  :haha:

CA3LE will get us something even cooler soon enough  :evil6:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if everyone agrees that testmy is more accurate then why are some people posting their speedtest.net scores in their sig?...just curious...doesn't make sense to me...posting inaccurate scores...and advertising for the site that did the test...

you know what tdawnaz they might have that in there sig but they are still posting here which means something. they like it here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, especially those of Van Buren's. The ones that look like he is about to bust the speedometers.  :lol:  (by the way, just joking Van) [i am actually still just jealous ]  :tongue2:

I thought we decided that as long as we keep seeing TMN on other web sites that we were not going to get our feathers in a ruffle?   :arrow:  :?:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought we decided that as long as we keep seeing TMN on other web sites that we were not going to get our feathers in a ruffle?  :arrow:  :?:

tommie, my feathers r not in a ruffle and i hear what ur saying but that's not what my post was about...the test is not accurate and it appears that testmy some how stands behind this other site...it's not up to testmy standards...i know what u guys r saying...but it's not going to be allowed...it in fact is against the sig standards in the forum rules...and we don't advertise for other speed test sites for free (there is a link in the lefthand column for that) and it's not free, i don't think it is anyway (they'd have to ask google)... :haha:

i know it looks cool...but the test is not up to our standards...i'm not trying to sound snooty but it's just a fact...we all know it

like i said...compare us with the rest and come back to the best :P

you know what tdawnaz they might have that in there sig but they are still posting here which means something. they like it here

i couldn't agree more...but...^^^...see above

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies. If it is in the rules, it is not that much to ask. Rules should be adhered if they are not rediculious, of which these are not. So be it.

But does that mean that the hooters and whoppers are out??

philp you mean like twin hooters spinning faster in opposite circles as you go faster. (or the girls could see a whopper spinning) :lol:

I do get a little confused though. So no more speed test site posts at all? Including speakeasy, VanBurens, Toast, etc... Or what exactly. I think over time it is a little hard to understand where the line actually stands. Possibly you could have CA3LE make an explicit post on the exactness of this rule, please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...