scoob8000 Posted December 21, 2006 CID Share Posted December 21, 2006 Just testing some new Fiber To The Home equipment our company is using.. Took about 4 tries to find a mirror that could keep up. Most were maxing around 10mb Of course this isn't production, I have no speed profiles setup yet. Thats just a default, but I thought it was pretty cool.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gotmilk Posted December 21, 2006 CID Share Posted December 21, 2006 Wow, that's an amazing connection you have there! *drools* Did you try both of the main testmy.net servers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shug7272 Posted December 21, 2006 CID Share Posted December 21, 2006 Huh, thats weird we are maxing at 10. Anyway if I may ask who do you work for. That is impressive none the less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted December 21, 2006 CID Share Posted December 21, 2006 very nice speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gotmilk Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 Well, apparently there was something wrong with server 1 earlier today, so try main server 1 again and see how it does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 Well, apparently there was something wrong with server 1 earlier today, so try main server 1 again and see how it does. there shouldn't have been a problem with it today... that was yesterday. Is everything fine right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 do a test on the main test and post your results http://www.testmy.net/speedtest/d_load.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltageman Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 28982 Kbps about 29 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3538 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/21 - 9:15pm Bottom Line:: 505X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.29 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.437 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 363.34 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3WK8XV65I User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!] Works fine for me.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 What is that scoob8000, 35/10 or something? You have very nice speeds also Voltageman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 26900 Kbps about 26.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3284 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/22 - 12:22am Bottom Line:: 469X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.31 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.703 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 154.98 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0PNQJ9I2L User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shug7272 Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 DAMN... when did Voltage and ma boy Blunted turn into the kings of speed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 I just noticed something, scoob8000 was using the 20 meg test fella's. http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=000&out_src=20MB And you were using the 12 meg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob8000 Posted December 22, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 I just noticed something, scoob8000 was using the 20 meg test fella's. http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=000&out_src=20MB And you were using the 12 meg. I assume a larger file will produce more accurate results? I'll have to try again with the 12mb file. I'll also try it off peak when everyone else isn't downloading pr0n.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 22, 2006 CID Share Posted December 22, 2006 I assume a larger file will produce more accurate results? I'll have to try again with the 12mb file. I'll also try it off peak when everyone else isn't downloading pr0n.. I was meaning the other way around. I was suggesting they test with the 20 meg. to make it even. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 26, 2006 CID Share Posted December 26, 2006 I assume a larger file will produce more accurate results? thats true, a test should last around 8 to 10 seconds here is what i get on the 20MB :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 35299 Kbps about 35.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 4309 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/26 - 3:56am Bottom Line:: 616X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.24 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 4.867 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 86 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I5FGO0VJL'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-I5FGO0VJL User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0. Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8 [!] and 12 MB :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 15118 Kbps about 15.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1845 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/26 - 4:05am Bottom Line:: 264X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.56 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.589 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 79.66 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BWUTVJ4O3 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0. Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8 [!] size is not the whole story, progressbar slow me down aswell. If you have a fast computer progressbar shouldnt make a diff, but im currently on a AMD 1700+ from -01 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted December 26, 2006 CID Share Posted December 26, 2006 thats a big difference in speed from the 12mb to the 20mb file van. why are you on a old amd 1700+? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 26, 2006 CID Share Posted December 26, 2006 thats a big difference in speed from the 12mb to the 20mb file van. why are you on a old amd 1700+? ah just realized i need to fix my sig, dont have that Dell anymore I been leasing it from my former employer, but i quit the job for another, so i had to return the pc or buy it. I choose to return it cos they wanted me to pay 2 662,22 USD for it even tho it was 1 year old... i offered them 2 014,65 USD, but they refused. Well. now I'm back on my old PC. will buy a new next year VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob8000 Posted December 28, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 28, 2006 Odd.. I still can't get more than 9.1mb from either TMN server. But I can consistantly pull close to 30mb from the Diablo server. Theres gotta be a router bottleneck somewhere between me and wherever the servers are hosted.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 28, 2006 CID Share Posted December 28, 2006 where do you live ? Diablo server is in NYC and TestMy.NeT is in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 28, 2006 CID Share Posted December 28, 2006 that sucks van... u should get a core 2 duo extreme =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 28, 2006 CID Share Posted December 28, 2006 that sucks van... u should get a core 2 duo extreme =) you bet things running in slowmotion right now, very frustrating lol, but ill need to wait to next year for a new pc, and it will be a core 2 duo, unless there is something better then VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted December 29, 2006 CID Share Posted December 29, 2006 you bet things running in slowmotion right now, very frustrating lol, but ill need to wait to next year for a new pc, and it will be a core 2 duo, unless there is something better then VanBuren get your self a nice core 2 duo and you will be nice and fast again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob8000 Posted December 29, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 29, 2006 I'm near Pittsburgh, PA so it would make sense that the NY server is faster because it's closer. Doing a traceroute it's actually only one hop closer than the TMN servers though. 10 one way and 11 the other. Oh well.. Why is everyone up on the C2D chips? You can pickup an AMD X2 for a chunk less and get pretty close to the same performance. Or get a dual core opteron. Oppys have 1mb of L2 for each core. I just built a pretty kickin' (for me anyway) Oppy 175 rig (2.2ghz x2). Also I would think your 1700+ should be able to handle the bandwidth okay. Try leaving windows task manager up on the performance tab while you do your test. See what your CPU usage goes up to. If it's getting pretty high, try a flat file test without the progress bar. It may be a matter of memory too, how much RAM do you have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 29, 2006 CID Share Posted December 29, 2006 Also I would think your 1700+ should be able to handle the bandwidth okay. Try leaving windows task manager up on the performance tab while you do your test. See what your CPU usage goes up to. If it's getting pretty high, try a flat file test without the progress bar. It may be a matter of memory too, how much RAM do you have? I have 512 MB of RAM, here is the result with taskmanager on :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 15164 Kbps about 15.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1851 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/29 - 7:52am Bottom Line:: 264X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.55 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.569 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 80.06 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9G72NQOUW User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 32674 Kbps about 32.7 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 3989 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/12/29 - 7:55am Bottom Line:: 570X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.26 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.258 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 72.47 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Y4AEHS0B3 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 [!] VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob8000 Posted December 29, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 29, 2006 Wow, does it max out with the flat file too (no progress bar)? Try running again with the process tab open, click the CPU column to sort by CPU usage. Then you can see what is maxing it out, browser, etc.. If it a system process I would think about the NIC card. Some cheaper and on-board network cards rely pretty heavily on the CPU to do their work. Sorry to hijack my own thread here.. hehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.