becman Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 Ok... but I'm currently downloading vidz (Thomas...) from youtube for my son. and got this.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtx Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 5:00 pm Manila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joserizal Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 455 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 56 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/16 - 4:33am Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 18.29 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 53.868 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 78.43 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VLZSFPH4U User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071204 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.11 [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 511 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 62 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/16 - 4:34am Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 16.52 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 48.004 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 100.39 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8N9GQ0R7J User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071204 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.11 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolbuster2007 Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 i noticed a big change in your speed test result. downgraded to plan 999? what happened Gat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khalil1974 Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 Yeah, what happened Gat Jose? Downgrade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raikou022 Posted December 16, 2007 CID Share Posted December 16, 2007 whew.. thanks for the tweaks.. this is with no proxy.. and this is w/ proxy.. but i prefer to use this during peak hours.. coz of its consistency.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wapodium Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 woohhh.. whooopping result! no proxy but with open dns and tweaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 just a comparison... (no proxies) i think #4 over did it. 1 - 3 are more realistic... i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joserizal Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavenandhell Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 11:42 am no proxies, just tcp optimizer here's the real deal (look at the test sizes used) fair enough huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawuiry Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 Does it really matter what test size it is? (It may sound confrontational, but I really don't know.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavenandhell Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 Does it really matter what test size it is? (It may sound confrontational, but I really don't know.) hello there pal i just wanna show the difference between test sizes. because i always get that 400-600kbps speed when i try to test it w/ smaller test size. but whenever i use a larger or largest test size, i think it gives me the (real deal ) much accurate results (300+kbps). as what momma t always said, "try testing w/ a larger file" or just ignore my post heh but it's up to you whether you like to test w/ small or a larger file. it doesn't matter (does it momma t?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 No, it's Ok. I really don't know if there's a difference. The 2 test I posted are similar but the lower test size (579) was done 4x before I got similar results. Now I know. thanks @ HnH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 here's why testing with a bigger size is better. if you use a smaller size, your connection might suddenly get a burst, which in turn finish the test faster, giving you a high result. if you test with a bigger size, it gives time for your connection to get to it's bearings, just like heating up the engine before running. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sexpert Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 gurl ka frostbound? ganda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 @ sexpert Woah, down boy... Frost is a guy. I read/saw it somewhere. But it made me wonder, too. @FB Thanks. Bursting is fun though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 aint so bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 gurl ka frostbound? ganda 1st victim!! anyway, thanks for complimenting my gf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 gurl ka frostbound? ganda translation = gurl you frostbound? beauty is that correct?? i found a filipino translator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 yup, just needs a few sentence arrangement. the translator translated word per word. obviously, it should be "you're a girl fr0stbound? pretty." edit:i should probably change this pic now, to avoid further confusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ExtremeFusion Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 nah.. it's just fine... shouldn't yah be proud of your Fiance.. hehehe sorry couldn't put an accent in the letter e but you already know what I am talking about.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 yeah, but when i think of all the people ogling at her Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ExtremeFusion Posted December 17, 2007 CID Share Posted December 17, 2007 OT: Darn it, I hope the basestation here got severely burn.. i don't care how.. useless SmartBro.. they wouldn't even want to fix my connection.. grrr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.