VanBuren Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 I made a Version 2 of my custom settings, and now i need testers to compare the new and the old. here is the new one VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 hmm i used the T3 option (changed the MTU to 1500 tho ) lol :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3288 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 401 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.55 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4J7DEOVL2 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3323 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 406 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6QFXX9VO :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3337 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 407 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 60 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6RGGBD0M :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 346 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is: 42 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 6 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 24.38 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=BSGUIEBB6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 18, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 hmm i used the T3 option (changed the MTU to 1500 tho ) lol :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3288 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 401 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.55 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4J7DEOVL2 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3323 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 406 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6QFXX9VO huh? T3? why did you use that? No use to compare scores if your not using the files i set a cap at. btw changed MTU???? T3 has a MTU of 1500 already, its the MSS thats 1460 MSS= MTU -40 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 T3 has a MTU of 1500 already, its the MSS thats 1460 MSS= MTU -40 VanBuren whoops my bad, your right and im using the t3 settings because its the only one that makes a diff for me = Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 18, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 whoops my bad, your right and im using the t3 settings because its the only one that makes a diff for me = The only diff you will see with T3 settings is burst speed, not the "real" speed your connection has and i bet on high ping sites you will run even slower with that high RWIN http://www.dslreports.com/faq/7718 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 lol im using the largest test and im up to 3.3 mb/s instead of 3.0 , so thoes settings helped me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeVeR29 Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 with T3.. .. Download Stats .. Connection is 4250 Kbps about 4.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is 519 KB/s Tested From http//www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line 76 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.97 second(s) Validation Link http//testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=H60J64AMP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 18, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 omg lol, do not use T3 settings, that file is made for connections with a download and upload speed of around 45 Mbps use the settings for your connection type and cap VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted November 18, 2004 CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 I tried the T3 just for the heck of it and i get the same results as i had with my other one lol, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 18, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 18, 2004 I tried the T3 just for the heck of it and i get the same results as i had with my other one lol' date='[/quote'] Yea against this site, try downloading on a high ping server, then you will see what i mean and also your flow control wont work very well when your uploading at same time as you downloading. I didnt make all these files just for fun VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 20, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 20, 2004 I need feedback, does the Version 2 file give faster speed up/down or not, and how does webbrowing work compared to the old files? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinOhioRR Posted November 21, 2004 CID Share Posted November 21, 2004 which one should i use? Im on RR, WIN98 3000/368 cap i belive, THANKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 21, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 21, 2004 which one should i use? Im on RR, WIN98 3000/368 cap i belive, THANKS quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by JustinOhioRR van, i tried updating, but those are for win2k on the 3k/384 settings, can you make one for win98? it wont let me load it :/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Use the 1500+ file in win 98 folder, but there is no upload tweaks for win 98. only xp and 2k has that setting VanBuren I would change to XP if i was you, alot better TCP stack to get speed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted November 22, 2004 CID Share Posted November 22, 2004 omg lol, do not use T3 settings, that file is made for connections with a download and upload speed of around 45 Mbps use the settings for your connection type and cap VanBuren Yeah, Van Buren is correct it may show a difference in burst speeds but I'm postive it slows down speed overall and you'll see a lag when browsing..... Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disturbed Posted November 22, 2004 CID Share Posted November 22, 2004 well i tested it and i like it.....i chose the correct setting and on the 2992KB test i do get like a crazy burst in the begining, and it seems like it finishes the test so fast, but according to the numbers it seems same - although, i like it....feels faster, when downloading im actually able to reach speeds of like 600-700Kb/s when comparing to before (~450) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinOhioRR Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 celeron 600 192 mb ram isnt running XP very good.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Van, I have added a portion from you on the Guides section. http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?p=9346 You can make updates to that post yourself by the way.. you now have MOD+ in all forums ~~ in that locked forum ithe post reply button may been 'locked' but since your a mod the button will just look that way.. but work Enjoy, and thank you for all the help van Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoShow Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 I tried it as well, with the correct settings for 4000/512. However it seemed like I got a burst from the beginning but the #'s stayed the same. All in all I like it. Good Job! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 cool VanBuren is a mod, thank you for bringing so much help to the site Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 23, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Im glad if i can help, helping ppl setup their connections is just a fun thing for me since i am a tweak geek VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Too bad there's no file specific for my connection. 2560/384 is unusual, and 4000/1024 even more, but still... they're not there. Could you make those two custom files for me? Too bad I still have to wait eons for the upgrade. Going from half-duplex to full worked. Getting ~75 Mbps now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 23, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Too bad there's no file specific for my connection. 2560/384 is unusual, and 4000/1024 even more, but still... they're not there. Could you make those two custom files for me? Too bad I still have to wait eons for the upgrade. Going from half-duplex to full worked. Getting ~75 Mbps now... Cool, 75 Mbps is a hard load on your hardrive aswell, that can be a abig bottleneck. I suggest you try Cable & DSL 2000 384 and Cable & DSL 3000 384 files and compare what file that works best for you. Here is a 4000/1024 file good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted November 23, 2004 CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Im glad if i can help, helping ppl setup their connections is just a fun thing for me since i am a tweak geek VanBuren I like that "Tweak Geek" that has potiental....lol Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted November 23, 2004 Author CID Share Posted November 23, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nymostwanted21 Posted November 28, 2004 CID Share Posted November 28, 2004 This is great! I have a 3.0/768 connection and used the 3.0/384 file and heres the results... Before :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2865 Kbps about 2.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 350 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 51 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.93 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=ROPB86CM8 Using The File :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3086 Kbps about 3.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 377 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 55 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.72 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=6XLH09R16 Great! I am definetly getting the best of my connection! Thanks Van Buren! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.