amc11890 Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.gwright.org.uk/images/pictures/Desktop/pict0783.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.gwright.org.uk/index.php%3Fpage%3Ddesktop&h=1200&w=1600&sz=326&tbnid=yHyrEHUxrS8J:&tbnh=112&tbnw=150&hl=en&start=6&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddust%2Bdesktop%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG 11 hard disks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 Damn! But only 1 gig of ram... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 which is plenty if he wants to use the box as a network attached storage raid... no idea. too lazy to read the link. sounds noisy though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 :haha: thats crazy *wonder what he put on all these drives* VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 Yea, I can't imagine filling up over 2 terabytes worth of hardrives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 Looks like he has one big music collection. And if he is into making 3d models and animations, he might need all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
water Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 I could fill that much HD space! I could I could! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 120GB Maxtor 7200RPM IDE hdd (2MB cache) - 60 GBP 200GB Seagate 7200RPM IDE hdd (8MB cache) - 100 GBP 200GB Seagate 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 81 GBP - RAID-5 200GB Seagate 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 81 GBP - RAID-5 200GB Maxtor 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 71 GBP - RAID-5 200GB Maxtor 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 71 GBP - RAID-5 300GB Western Digital 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 99 GBP - RAID-5 300GB Western Digital 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 99 GBP - RAID-5 300GB Western Digital 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 99 GBP - RAID-5 300GB Western Digital 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 99 GBP - RAID-5 300GB Western Digital 7200RPM SATA hdd (8MB cache) - 99 GBP - RAID-5 2.62Tera 2620Ggigs HO MY GOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattymcbluff Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 no RAID 5 config so a lot less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 RAW is 2.62Tera 4X200G raid5 = 600Ggigs 5X300G raid5 = 1200 Ggigs plus 120Gig plus 200Gig comes to a grand total of 2.62 Terra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted December 18, 2005 Author CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 he also has a dreamcast...lol(4th pic down) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 he is a spoiled kid isnt he slick keyboard 2 screens man he is loaded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anox195 Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 how much porn does this kid download.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted December 18, 2005 Author CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 GBP= how much U.S. Dollars? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 1 usd = 0.565103 gbd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 So 1124 US Dollars + the 2 monitors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6arett Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 I never understood the reason to have SO much music, I mean seriously...will you even listen to half of that? And must have alot of porn for needing 2.2TB lol And it dosent even look like the drives have power connected to them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
water Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 I never understood the reason to have SO much music, I mean seriously...will you even listen to half of that? And must have alot of porn for needing 2.2TB lol And it dosent even look like the drives have power connected to them I run an online radio station, so yes, I would use it and it would be listened to by a LOT of people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 18, 2005 CID Share Posted December 18, 2005 Thats cool, what are you using to broadcast your radio? And what kind of connection do you have, and how fast do you need to broadcast? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
water Posted December 19, 2005 CID Share Posted December 19, 2005 we use sw cast with SAM3 at a 64 bit rate. Our connection is cable (roadrunner) and we run 3 transcoders so that the listners in dial up don't buffer like most stations. Myself, I pull the music directly off my computer, but most of our DJ's stream remotely through the server. They also store their music on it in their own areas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richcornucopia Posted December 19, 2005 CID Share Posted December 19, 2005 So your upload is 384? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
water Posted December 19, 2005 CID Share Posted December 19, 2005 Hmph, I'm not sure, going to ask the better half how that all plays out. There's some formula due to the program and the differences in song bitrates... it alsways makes my head spin, so I try not to get to into it. All I know is that the cable connection serves the purpose and satellite can't handle it. Dsl can't either. I need either cable or a T-1. I am certainly not paying for a T-1! We almost never have skipping or buffering, if we do, it's not due to our connection, but our computers. Of course, for a long time he was streaming on a tweaked 386 pentium 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 19, 2005 CID Share Posted December 19, 2005 Thats pretty rediculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted December 19, 2005 CID Share Posted December 19, 2005 thats what i call a shit load of drives. :haha: :haha: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyJM Posted December 22, 2005 CID Share Posted December 22, 2005 Does he have his subwoofer sitting on top of his case? Seems to me that wouldn't be a great idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.