Jump to content

ROM-DOS

Inactive Moderator
  • Posts

    1,599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Days Won

    1
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by ROM-DOS

  1. Thanks CA3LE Administrator Expert of the nth degree. . . .and may the Lords of Internet Co-connected Diffractive Diversity smile upon thee.
  2. NoCharge.com for FREE :haha: I and don't worry IHateDialUP ~ you'll start tweaking your settings ~ soon enough ~ lol . . .by the way ~ just kidding w/u ~ Welcome aboard !
  3. On behalf of Cholla, myself and any other 'Dial-uppers' that find their way here to testmy.net ~ THANK YOU!! ~
  4. alright, I'm in da lounge ~ and 'Frank' ain't talkin' I don't think 'Frank' is real or he died in there. . . .any Mods have your X-ray vision on - go check on Frank, would ya?
  5. . . .I don't know, but maybe changing 'your name' might help ~ at least the 'original gods' of 'internet connect' might smile again upon you ~ or else, you know, your speeds will just get lower and lower and . . .
  6. j/k ~ but nothing should be free if you think having multible accounts(let's say, 3800) is the right of your 'Freedom'! (but I do think I guessed the right date ~ lol ~ and so what if the 20000th members name is gonna be ROMi-DOS)
  7. . . .feel free to comment ~ but not all comments will be taken freely ~ lol Edit by RTB: Removed the caps. No need to yell, we can hear you just fine. . . .no problem ~ RTB ~ sometimes I just start 'thinking out loud' not realizing I'm 'yelling' ~ lol (oh, sorry for laughing out loud, too) . . .shhhhhh!!!!!
  8. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.0f click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 450.80Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 720.89kb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 100 Mbps Full duplex Fast Ethernet subnet WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 321 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 321 CurrentCwnd: 26280 CurrentMSS: 1460 CurrentRTO: 480 CurrentRwinRcvd: 25696 CurrentRwinSent: 5840 CurrentSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 918340 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 629 DupAcksIn: 0 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 26280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 820 MaxRTT: 440 MaxRwinRcvd: 25696 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 470 MinRTT: 220 MinRwinRcvd: 25696 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 <~ ouch, I'm Nagled PktsIn: 321 PktsOut: 629 PktsRetrans: 0 Rcvbuf: 128000 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SmoothedRTT: 250 Sndbuf: 128000 SndLimTimeRwin: 8835007 SndLimTimeCwnd: 1397616 SndLimTimeSender: 11464 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 852640 SndLimBytesCwnd: 65700 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SumRTT: 83950 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTime: 2147483647 CurrTime: 10262353 c2sData: 5 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 6 s2cAck: 2 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.13>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0>2], (estimate > 2) [42.59>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0.71>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.45<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.86>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.13>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0.71<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.71>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.45<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0.71<5] (Estimate > 50 [42.59>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.86>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0.71<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0011190845997305567=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.86>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.13>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] bw = 42.59 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 261.52msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 42.59 Mbps The transmit buffer (125.0 KByte) limits the application to 3.73 Mbps Your receive buffer (25.0 KByte) limits the application to 0.74 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 0.76 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'FastE', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is 'OC-12', Server Acks report link is 'T1' . . . how long do I have ~ Doc ~ you can tell me
  9. . . .no 'Nagling' here ~ I don't even have MSMQ in my Registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESoftwareMicrosoftMSMQParameters (but I do think I guessed the right date for the 20000th membership) ch
  10. . . . you do know ~ you have to pay the New Membership Fee each time (how do you think they're gonna pay for all those neat prizes ~ lol)
  11. . . . O-Tay, let's start predicting the 20000th Members date! I'm predicting Xmas eve 2005 . . . and there's a real special prize if you can guess that members name ~ lol
  12. . . . went there once and really got paranoid who's Frank?
  13. Thanks ~ Rumbai88 ~ Date Registered: October 09, 2005, at 09:40:00 AM contact Prize Party to recieve your FREE surprise!!
  14. http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=4533 An "unofficial" preview pack of SP3 is available at The Hotfix, a software download site and discussion forum that focuses on patches and software updates. Ethan Allen, the creator and administrator of The Hotfix, said Wednesday he put together the preview pack from software updates he received from an internal Microsoft source that are expected to be released in SP3. Some of those updates include Windows log-on improvements and features that fix current problems with connecting Windows XP computers to various networks, according to the SP3 forum on the site. Allen, a Microsoft beta tester who previously worked for software giant, updates the list of technologies for Windows XP SP3 daily based on information found on Microsoft's website. "Microsoft makes it freely available about what
  15. [move]tek dis site out[/move] http://www.hackinthebox.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=&topic=28 . . .and don't forget to get your INFOSEC PAGER !! http://www.zone-h.org/en/infosec
  16. [move] IHateDialUp [move] [/move] [/move]
  17. http://www.onzin.nl/internetdownload/
  18. OMG ~ I didn't come here to 'brag' or to post fake a$$ scores - (as though I would know how to do that) ~ someone post a fake a$$ score and let's see if we can validate it! I was just amazed (as anyone) when I first posted with a connection of 64 Kbps ~ 'over cap'. Then I tryed a test without the progress bar and got 165 Kbps and started to wonder what was causing these scores. I thought, maybe it has to do with loading graphics - since that seems like the only difference I've noticed going back to 'dial-up' from Comcast HS ~ though, I can still stream 'Google Earth' pretty well and loading pages with heavy graphics only takes 2-3 seconds longer. As for downloading large files from the net ~ I can use a downloader(FreshDownload) with up to 8 'simultaneus conections'. I'm not, in any way, thinking I'm competing with HS cable ~ lol ~ but, I do think connecting above my 'cap' is somewhat interesting. I thought maybe it had to do with 'turning off' my modem compression and enabling MS MPPC? I do know it has to do with my CableNut settings in some way ~ 'cause if I completely 'clear'em' I'm back to 'normal' 56k standards. ~ another reason I'm here ~ wondering if anyone might have any insight as to what those settings might be, that are allowing me to 'over cap'? . . .and yes, there is a 'dial-up burst' when I first start downloading ~ as I have explained earlier in this overly scutinized topic ~ lol ~ but, if you want to give some feed back on what some of the CableNut settings I'm using - that may be allowing me to 'over cap', I'm all ears. I hate messing with something that seems to be doing 'well' ~ but, I usually do anyway!! (always thinking - it could be better ~ lol) . . .anyway, here's to your 'fake a$$' scathing skepticism. ~ lighten up ~ lol
  19. Pete ~ I'm not lying about anything ~ I'm just as confused as anyone and everyone. [move][move]:::..[/move] Download Stats [move]..:::[/move][/move] Connection is:: 123 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 15 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Fri Oct 7 22:50:38 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 68.27 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 48.19 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-D62KN0EAJ
  20. reverse engineering is harder than you think, but I'm working on it [move]. . .[move]should have it figured out by june 6th, 2006[/move] ~ [move]~[/move][/move]
×
×
  • Create New...