tommie gorman

You never know, it's always possible.

And what was your particular location soongteck?

Hilarious find water. Guess that raps up what we do on here now. Feed the damned gerbils, maybe it will run faster.

For a minute I thought you had something. But as dlewis said, it is too old hat.

What a life. Better than being single and bored.

Why's that?

Just curious, did you scan in safe mode?? It does make a difference. It will be slower, but much more thorough.

Yep, it is nice when things run smoothly.

So what happened to the question Supreme1.

That would save me a lot of money. Nice find. Come on baby, open the box.

I liked the first one better. In fact I liked this little guy much better than the last 2, at least it sounded something like music. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjA5faZF1A8&mode=related&search= Just my opinion of course. And I prefer country...but he is pretty good.

That would work, or say he got sick from eating too much candy, and had to go home. Aren't kids great, so easily swayed, or was that gullable. (innocent, thats the word )

Definately one of the most unusual methods I have ever seen used. I guess you can have fat fingers and still play well. And the way he drummed was unique also. Nice work. So play up Sparticus.

Except the kidney part my 5 and 7 year old would love that. They love the Candyland game.

Here Sparticus main server 20 meg test. Clear temp files before testing. http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=000&out_src=20MB That will be more comparable.

Satelite Yours :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 799 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 98 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.uploadingit.com Test Time:: 2006/12/18 - 12:07pm Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.45 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 32.328 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 77.5 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JGX35PFY8'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-JGX35PFY8 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Main server, right behind :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1212 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 148 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/18 - 12:11pm Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.92 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.218 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 17.56 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YZC1RDO7V User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Hmmm... Third test, you have to love the consistency of satelite. Main server. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 866 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 106 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/18 - 12:14pm Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 9.66 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 28.297 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 84 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DO2RAUCGT User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] So yours again. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 579 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB) Download Speed is:: 71 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.uploadingit.com Test Time:: 2006/12/18 - 12:20pm Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 14.42 sec Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 44.578 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 56.16 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-J4FLRE31U User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] 5th test, I give up. 6 meg file test on main server. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1045 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 128 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/18 - 12:25pm Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 8 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 46.906 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 1.36 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-D2BEKUFPR User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Guess that is satelite for you. Sorry I could not be of more help.

I am not going to say one way or the other on tweaking. When I first got on dway I was getting 700 D/L speeds. Ater the Reverands settings with TCP Optimizer it has always been 1030 since. Now I really don't care how it is figured, but that is what happened on my end. Just facts. And U/L always varies.

I would say right on target. And welcome to the forum pioneer_56

So are you saying I need to sign up for 30,00 months? Or get 30,000 other people to join up. Just kidding. But I do hope they find it in their budget soon. I like these new little guys.

Arctic silver is pretty well known on here. No problems there. Although the other is probably a fine product.

Welcome to the forum JimA.Fennessey Mostly stopping to say hi. So is what coknuck posted pretty much what you were looking for?

Along them lines you might also read this. Achieve the Best Performance Out of Your Computer http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-4257 Daily maintenance helps a bunch. And welcome to the forum tupacshakur187

But IDK if they had the different years like that one. It looked a little different.

I believe low end digital starts at 3mp. I could be wrong. 2 is pretty low. But they do not expect you to blow it up much. Mp is more for expanding without becoming blurry. The pics should be fine for very small pics. I remember a friend of mine e-mailed one to me from his phone. I posted it, before the pics got bigger in here. But don't expect it to be very big before it gets blurry. But it should do what you are saying. Also it will probably limited on the number of pics you can take. And no adjustments. For real pics you will need a real camera. Camera phones are mostly for fun and convenience. Just my thoughts. But you will also be able to e-mail them to your self on the spot.

Nice one Ryan. Thanks.