CA3LE Posted December 24, 2004 CID Share Posted December 24, 2004 This is crazy.. and I have no explanation for this, but I am sure that FireFox M2 (an optimized FireFox I use) has something to do with it. Everytime I download my logs in tar format I get a ridiculous transfer rate... for a while I thought it was just that the browser was reporting wrong... but when I noticed tonight when I grabbed a 2GB apache log in a mere 323 seconds I was a little freaked out... just to make sure I didn't fall asleep and my brain was playing tricks on me I tried again (my screenshot you can see that on in progress... only seconds later it was already at 400+MB) ~~ This is NOT something that is in cache... this is a unique apache log that I have NEVER downloaded, this is actually a file that is generated on the fly by my server. Now, to kinda shed some light on the situation a little, I tried the same file in IE... ran at about 600+ KB/s --- I looked at my transfer from my server and my server didn't send out that much information... also I didn't recieve that much information on the other end....... yet I STILL got a 2GB file sitting on my desktop.... again, this is NOT a file I have EVER downloaded before... and this happens only in M2 and actually happens often with stats and DB back-up... this is not the first time. I don't know how this happened, it has to do with compression... very insane. I wish the whole internet would do this So 2GB / 323 sec is about 6435 KB/sec or 52715 Kbps or about 53 Mbps ~~ beat that score guys --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted December 24, 2004 CID Share Posted December 24, 2004 6435 KB/sec yeah thats fast....so can I get that speed from COX in Tucson???....LOL... HO HO HO>>>>> Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra Posted December 25, 2004 CID Share Posted December 25, 2004 whats firefox m2? im on v1! since when did they change the v1 to m2! if i knew where the smilies were right now, id be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted December 25, 2004 CID Share Posted December 25, 2004 I have a question, is Firefox M2 suitable for home users or not? I was at its site and it said that this M2 build is only suitable for certain processors,etc. So my question is, can I download and use it, or should I stick with regular V.1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 25, 2004 CID Share Posted December 25, 2004 It seems that you are not allowed to download or view attachments on this board. nice :"( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted December 25, 2004 CID Share Posted December 25, 2004 yeah I am getting that aswrell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netmasta Posted December 26, 2004 CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 It seems that you are not allowed to download or view attachments on this board. nice :"( Just click on the name of the image, which is in kind of small writing right under the pic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 26, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 Just click on the name of the image, which is in kind of small writing right under the pic. Well, it wasn't working for a while... I corrected everyones permissions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 26, 2004 CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 I know Internet Explorer would do that to me when i was on 56k. I had a host with the Ensim control panel. I download a Backup of my site and it was going at like 300kbps. The file was around 30Mb big. I was like.. holy f*ck, and I did download it.. I notice that happens whenever the file was an "unknown" size. Its pretty cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 26, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 I know Internet Explorer would do that to me when i was on 56k. I had a host with the Ensim control panel. I download a Backup of my site and it was going at like 300Kbps. The file was around 30Mb big. I was like.. holy f*ck, and I did download it.. I notice that happens whenever the file was an "unknown" size. Its pretty cool. I still don't get it... and yes.. same here "Unknown size" tar.gz I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omgitsjames08 Posted January 16, 2005 CID Share Posted January 16, 2005 DOwnloads for certain processors http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 16, 2005 CID Share Posted January 16, 2005 nice speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted January 16, 2005 CID Share Posted January 16, 2005 New M3 vs I.E. M3 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6010 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 734 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 107 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.4 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=RC8YAHSBU :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 356 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 43 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 6 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 23.81 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=HQB2PDJXT I.E. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5874 Kbps about 5.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 717 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 105 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.43 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=RKDV45EO3 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 364 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is:: 44 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 7 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 23.27 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=BAL82DO5G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted January 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 22, 2005 By the way, for anyone who needs FireFox m1, m2 or m3 they can be found at http://moox.ws/tech/mozilla/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senic Posted January 22, 2005 CID Share Posted January 22, 2005 I tried it and it seemed slower than FF1.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice Posted January 22, 2005 CID Share Posted January 22, 2005 Not sure I want to try that out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.