ZaZi Posted March 5, 2008 CID Share Posted March 5, 2008 Tweaked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
technicolor Posted March 5, 2008 CID Share Posted March 5, 2008 wanting it to be higher.. eheh! but this result is already from my tweaking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman wow! you jammed with those people? and ely liked your band?? wow!!!!! why did you stopped playing? i think you were really successful back in the days.. OT well, we were. but our day jobs keep us from being on the scene. besides, it's only great when you're young but we all know it won't last. ....but we also made sure we got our share of groupies. JK and i agree w/ derek, bullying ain't cool unlike what you see in movies. I used to bully my boss (i've got a 220-pound-5'10"-frame) and now i really regret it. He was well off before he resigned but now he's just a regular employee. i'm not gonna tell you what i did but i made a 45yo man cry... but i've managed to patch things up w/ everyone i stepped on (since hi school) 'cept for him. @CB my speed slowed down. is it ok if i just use TCPOptimizer (no cablenut)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman,.,. i just bought a 400 watts PS last month because my PS smelled like its burning hhi,., ill just buy an enclosure,,anyone there have an enclosure,,,sell it to me LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman,.,. i just bought a 400 watts PS last month because my PS smelled like its burning hhi,., ill just buy an enclosure,,anyone there have an enclosure,,,sell it to me LOL that's good. i'm not even sure if they still offer the USB coz for all i know they'll profit more on enclosures rather than the cheap USB. it may even be phased out already (IDE-USB). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drake010203 Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman do you have an extra enclosure that you are not using?? LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman do you have an extra enclosure that you are not using?? LOL yes, i have an extra enclosure... for an aircon. JK sorry, don't have any. the cheapest i saw (although i didn't really looked hard) was Php1,700. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexftw Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 35 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/03/06 - 5:58am Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 256 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 89.813 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 11.25 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-07DVGF8U1 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) --my speed while downloadin two programs. full of win and here's the real test: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 107 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 13 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/03/06 - 6:17am Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 78.77 sec Tested from a 97 kB file and took 7.406 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 34.41 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DF7Q6YCMT User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 @becman ouch thats not cheap,,im not rich heheh ,.,ill buy an enclosure at tipidpc ,its cheaper,..,do you know where can i buy a 250GB seagate Hard disk for a low price,,my budget is 4000,,T_T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 OT @becman,,whats the difference of IDE and SATA HDD i dnt know what to buy,,isaw a SATA HDD at tipidpc,,250GB for only 2,800 i think ide is what i need Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jokesor Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 nyahaha.. look at my speed.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
becman Posted March 6, 2008 CID Share Posted March 6, 2008 IDE is older. Performance, well they say SATA is faster but you can hardly see the difference. Physically: (just look behind the HD... IDE requires the huge cable) IDE: parallel interface SATA: serial interface Serial vs. Parallel The fundamental difference between the two formats is how the data is transferred between the device and the processors. Traditional ATA devices and controllers use a parallel data transfer mechanism. Parallel processing is a fairly common technique where multiple channels of data are sent simultaneously to try and increase the amount of data transferred in a single clock cycle. In the case of the ATA/100 standards used by today's IDE drives and controllers, they send the data across a 16-bit channel. The problem with this type of mechanism is the number of wire required to transfer that data. This is why the ATA cables are so wide. It is necessary to have the 40 or 80 wires required to transfer the data. The problem with this is the interference caused between these wires. At higher clock speeds necessary for faster speeds, the interference between the wires is too great to allow for reliable transmission. Over the last couple of years, many advances have been developed in serial transmission techniques. Specifically through the development of the Universal Serial Bus interfaces. Serial transmissions run across a single control channel compared to the multiple channels of a parallel interface. This means that at the same clock speeds, the serial line will carry less data, but because the serial method requires fewer wires, less interference is generated to cause data integrity problems. This allows for serial transmission methods to run at much higher speeds than the equivalent parallel methods. In the case of the first Serial ATA standard, the clock runs at 1500 MHz compared to a clock rate of 50 MHz of the ATA/100 standard. http://forums.cnet.com/5208-7591_102-0.html?forumID=26&threadID=96396&messageID=1094326 http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-30653-Difference-between-IDE-and-SATA.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 @becman...thnxXx i research about it last night hihi,,i got it now,.,i will buy a 250GB seagate for only 2800 yeah,,,i found one at tipidpc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerby_kerby Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 i found a cheap enclosure at a pc shop, worth about P700. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liesfortheliars Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 @kerby i found a much cheaper enclosure worth 530 hehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerby_kerby Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 @kerby i found a much cheaper enclosure worth 530 hehe oh, i see. hehehe. i have another suggestion, why dont you buy a HD for a latop? so thats its much smaller and can double as an external HD, but the other suggestions is also an external HD. but this is much smaller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hottestarcher Posted March 7, 2008 CID Share Posted March 7, 2008 my speed at 5:30 a.m today. It's fast because it's still off peak but once it reaches the regular hours in the morning til night, it goes as slow as a dialup connection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted March 8, 2008 CID Share Posted March 8, 2008 lol, i leave my computer for 3 weeks and something horribly wrong happened to my connection. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 10 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 1 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/03/08 - 1:58am Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1024 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 837.312 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 3.22 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KQ4YW213V User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] hope it's an upgrade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexftw Posted March 8, 2008 CID Share Posted March 8, 2008 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 100 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 12 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/03/08 - 6:39am Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 85.33 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 31.532 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 32.26 % of your hosts average (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7YCHKTI1U User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] on an average day of sucky smart bro... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fr0stbound Posted March 8, 2008 CID Share Posted March 8, 2008 compared to what i'm having now, i'll take your speed anytime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZaZi Posted March 8, 2008 CID Share Posted March 8, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.