Motandme liked a post in a topic by mudmanc4 in U.S. average Internet speed is 22.6 Mbps? (source wanted)
I'll make the hypothesis that there have recently been tests run which are above the average, where the results might be well above the average, and in a sense, skewing the averaged equation. But not really incorrect, considering the results would be one if not the most 'live' or up to the minute correct mean that can be found.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by CA3LE in Which ISP to go for ADSL line in Bedfordview
Note: you can also do this for states.
Arizona download speed city rank with a minimum of 5000 recent results.
California download speed city rank with a minimum of 5000 recent results.
Colorado download speed city rank with a minimum of 5000 recent results.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by CA3LE in Which ISP to go for ADSL line in Bedfordview
Actually @mudmanc4 that lists all the hosts with "za" anywhere in the name.
I'm not sure if that functionality is even easy to find here. I'll make sure that it's easier to find soon.
For now, here's a URL shortcut to make your own queries.
/countryrank (base URL)
/us (change this to the two letter country code you'd like to query)
/down (if you'd like to rank upload instead change this to /up)
/20000 (this is the minimum recent test count... helps filter out the less popular results, which makes for better data. Smaller cities can appear much higher or lower because of the smaller sample size.)
In this way you can create the link above for ZA
You can also look directly at Bellfordview, ZA -- look at the ISP Rank tab
Also look at the Speed Test Log using the button below the graph.
Not very many results in Bellfordview so I would look also at the cities nearby. Like Germiston, ZA (I'm not sure of the area, you'd know probably know better [larger] cities to search for in your area. You can search on TestMy.net but personally I just use google and search for "Germiston ZA testmy.net" or any other city.)
Repeat that for some other cities nearby. If you keep seeing Telkom Internet [www.telkom.co.za] on top it can be safe to say they're your best choice in the area, especially if there is as much difference as we've seen in the first two cities.
There may be less popular, faster choices so make sure you look at the Speed Test Log and tell TMN ranking to 'Show All' -- this setting will be remembered for subsequent queries.
So actually, upon closer inspection... I'd check out Internet Solutions [www.is.co.za] first, especially if you see them coming up high on the list allot on the other major cities in the area.
Just because the sheep mostly flock to one pasture doesn't mean the grass is actually better. They may not have found the other meadow yet, they may just want to stick with what they know or they may just tend to go where the other sheep go. Sometimes the less popular choice is really the better one.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by xs1 in Changed Ethernet, splitter and coaxial and my speed is slower now?!
Id put the old splitter back in and retest. I've had shit luck with splitters over the years and found that the original one that come with the setup works the best.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by paladin in Manual download testing
Long time since on forum. Still test on here Quite often. This is still the BEST site for me.
I can't get on here much as I am sole caretaker for my Wife who has short term memory loss.
Thanks for the great site and Happy New Year.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by Roco in Hi TMN folk
don't post much these days I have regressed back into historic cars , and letting computer tech past me by in the fast lane , indeed going back to my roots inn my old age
but logged in to say Happy Peaceful NEW YEAR in 2017 it's already arrived in the UK ,
DDFXA liked a post in a topic by mudmanc4 in Speed test providers variations
@Parado I can appreciate your frustrations, as I am sure so many of the rest of us can as well. Until we get a grasp as to how the ISP we are using is actually treating our connection, compared to what we expect, especially when it becomes difficult to brows, as many of us have had that issue.
Summer months for myself can be taxing, and I'm not always as available here as I'd like to be. It seems many people ignore working machines, which act as 'dust filters' , collecting anything which the fans run through. Once the heat of the season hits, electronics explain the importance of regular cleanings when the system thermal settings are hit.
Just left a small companies datacenter where no filtration system was utilized other than what went through the rest of the office, three racks of servers 3/4 filled was a daunting cleaning task. I would have pics but the HR gal was adamant about not letting it out. I literally filled three office waste bags from the shop vac out of the servers themselves, and a good bit more from under and around the racks. The duct had not been cleaned in a millennia, took me 10 minutes just to pull the packed filter out.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by Sean in Down & Up Combined Score
Test run on the Irish Three 4G network in Donegal town, possibly LTE+ (OnePlus 2 phone):
It's also my fastest TestMy download result to date, certainly did not expect to see my first >100Mbps result on a cellular network, let alone the Three network especially with the past experience of prioritising/throttling ports. As far as I can tell, they treat port 80 and 8080 equally now and the above test was a normal linear HTTP test with the UK server.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by Assassin5150 in What is speed test actually measuring
You are measuring the speed from your device (pc,tablet,phone) to the test server. The ip address you are seeing is the static IP given to you by your ISP. No you cannot connect directly to their server to test your speed unless they put up a test server. The point of doing a speed test it too see if you are getting the bandwidth you are paying for from your Isp or to help you figure out local network issues.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by Michael95621 in Comcast Speed Slow
I had a comcast tech come out, and I don't know how much of what he said was right/wrong but his basic message was: "I should rent a modem/router combo from them because the owned ones don't get updated right so you have to buy a new one at $200 a pop every 2 years anyways so you're not saving money, but if you don't want to do that buy the Netgear AC1900 router/broadband modem combo "nighthawk", also Comcast and Linksys don't get along and we have problems with the Arris modems too".
Since the Nighthawk was cheaper in total than the modem + router I recently bought, and I didn't want to argue about the fact I had a Zoom modem and Asus router before with the same problem, I decided to return the arris and linksys and get the nighthawk instead.
I plugged it in and have it all fired up. Over wired connection this was my speed:
Wireless 2.4 Ghz Laptop 1:
Wireless 5 Ghz Galaxy S5:
122.9 Mbps and 7.8 Mbps
The second laptop gets similar results as my first laptop on 2.4 ghz and similar results as my phone on 5 ghz. This leads me to believe that the 2.4 Ghz band is the problem (which I don't doubt given I live in a suburb with at least 15 other wifi signals available to me and probably a bunch more 2.4 ghz noise interference) with that and that there must have been some connectivity issue between my router and modem that is now resolved with it being a combo unit. I can only assume that you were right and that the cat 5e cable was the issue, but stupid me I ordered those cables without prime shipping but ordered the combo unit with prime so the cables aren't here yet for me to test.
Thanks again for all of your help and I really love this site to get accurate information about my issues. For now I think I am going to count my blessings that I can get close enough to my advertised speeds on everything but 2.4 ghz and worry about that at another time, since I suspect I can't fix it.
psyber liked a post in a topic by mudmanc4 in my current speed with sky (uk) before i go fttc tomorrow
We've got you covered @psyber , sorry for the delay in approving your posts.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by psyber in my current speed with sky (uk) before i go fttc tomorrow
well fibre is officially live and im quite impressed with the new speeds
and here is a little graph to show the jump from adsl to fttc that i achieved.
im 1.7km from exchange and 400m from the street box thing
nevize liked a post in a topic by mudmanc4 in Does checking internet speed online, in anyway affects bandwidth?
Testing any connection this way uses the allocated data. The data provided to your specific contract with the service provider.
After the test is over, it's over. Therefore no choking of the connection.
Now during the test procedure, it is recommended to eliminate all other sources of internal throughput, under normal tests.
mudmanc4 liked a post in a topic by spypet in PSA: enable QoS to lower Latency since 11/15/2016
in april 2016 and again november 2016, twcable maxx and charter customers may have noticed their isp server being over provisioned. IMHO this is a marketing gimmick to allow you to "speedtest" 15-20% faster - but at an unstable high latency speed. if your router's quality of service is disabled, and you are now seeing wired speedtests on your 50/5(60/6) service at 70/6 (or double this on double speed 100/10 tiers) I would strongly recommend you enable QoS and set it closer to 60/6 (about 15-20% below peek speedtest). this will lower the speedtest reads, but it will also lower your Latency back down to where it should be. lower latency during peek bursts of speed will benefit twitch gamers and lower the error re-transmission rate needed by bulk down-loaders. if you can't enable your QoS, but use a torrent or download client, you may want to at least cap the download rate within these clients 20% below your top speedtest.