CA3LE

I ran it last night... worked fine on my end. 60 minute interval. Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 10:11:32 am 2.9 MB 3.34 Mbps || 407 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net FQW6H0GB8 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 10:11:15 am 50 MB 50.89 Mbps || 6.07 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 36EB4URGJ Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 9:11:31 am 2.9 MB 3.39 Mbps || 414 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 4Q7FXPG1B Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 9:11:13 am 50 MB 49.46 Mbps || 5.9 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net JRUK7MZBX Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 8:11:31 am 2.9 MB 3.17 Mbps || 387 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net O294CHNMZ Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 8:11:11 am 50 MB 52.43 Mbps || 6.25 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 1Q5ENSTFX Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 7:11:28 am 2.9 MB 3.22 Mbps || 393 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 1TFWQL8I9 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 7:11:10 am 50 MB 51.65 Mbps || 6.16 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 0K4Q1ILSC Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 6:11:27 am 2.9 MB 3.25 Mbps || 396 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net GNMSO7ID1 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 6:11:09 am 50 MB 49.27 Mbps || 5.87 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net EL4PJ0Z75 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 5:11:30 am 2.9 MB 3.33 Mbps || 406 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net QT8UX1EI0 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 5:11:06 am 50 MB 52.65 Mbps || 6.28 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net A6KBT7XP1 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 4:11:30 am 2.9 MB 3.26 Mbps || 398 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net G4AIDK3WE Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 4:11:05 am 50 MB 50.67 Mbps || 6.04 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net PD310VKH2 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 3:11:22 am 2.9 MB 3.22 Mbps || 393 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net XKQ94LVEP Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 3:11:04 am 50 MB 47.54 Mbps || 5.67 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 8MFLWUTE0 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 2:11:19 am 2.9 MB 3.23 Mbps || 394 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net OUP86TXA3 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 2:11:01 am 50 MB 50.83 Mbps || 6.06 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net W85RNH0EX Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 1:11:17 am 2.9 MB 3.31 Mbps || 404 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net MJD4KXO2P Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 1:10:59 am 50 MB 50.91 Mbps || 6.07 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net YI06BHMA8 Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 12:11:27 am 2.9 MB 2.58 Mbps || 315 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net 9A8VMFZLN Thu Nov 25 2010 @ 12:11:06 am 50 MB 39.08 Mbps || 4.66 MB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net F0T5PQBID Wed Nov 24 2010 @ 11:11:27 pm 5.8 MB 4.39 Mbps || 535 kB/s CA3LE 6621164607688 Cox.net WM5SVEXTL [/code]

There was a problem like this but it should be resolved. I'm also in OSX by the way. I just ran the scheduled test a few days ago and it worked perfectly for me. I'll give it a try right now and let you know what I find. -CA3LE

Gobble Gobble... Hope everyone has a Happy Thanksgiving

It was nice

Thank you everyone.

Thanks guys... I will.

Welcome to the site, enjoy your stay. - CA3LE

Good to hear, glad I could be of assistance. - CA3LE

Welcome to TestMy.net jackytsui... I hope you find what you're looking for.

Good luck, let us know how it goes.

Yeah, I had a feeling that they charged more outside the US. Lame. Damn, Windows ME?!! I haven't seen that first hand in over 10 years. I can't believe that you didn't have problems with it... you must have been the only one. Ubuntu is awesome, I've built a bunch of Ubuntu machines... they run great. And if you're already running Linux the transition should be smooth. They just released a new version Oct. Get it here. What is the newegg equivalent in the UK?

Your host may not have very good peering. Read this >> https://testmy.net/legit-speed-test.php The results that you get here can be trusted more over a test that you take on a server a couple hundred miles away. The problem with many smaller and some larger ISP's is that they don't usually have good peering relationships. But if they are really small there may not be anything they can do... that's just their quality of service. To fix the problem they would have to get more outbound providers. Good luck. Welcome to the site by the way.

There actually was a bug with that. I had to let it run last night to see what you were talking about. Thank you for reporting this I've corrected the issue.

Working fine on my end as well. What was the problem that you were having?

Have you thought about a Mac Mini? They're awesome.

gzelman, you may want to read http://xplornetsucks.blogspot.com/2007/12/so-what-we-know-about-xplornet.html Does anyone have any insight into this?

Welcome knev

Well, if you're in Italy the chances are that your speeds will be effected going all the way to our server in Dallas, TX USA. Are you experiencing slower than normal speeds everywhere?

If you are used to the networking from older version of Windows then the Windows 7 network settings are a little weird. In my experience I've found that most of the same stuff is there, you just have to dig for it. It's obvious that MS tried to make it easier and more simple... but at the expense of people who were so familiar with the old way.

Damn, 107Mbps... I wish Cox offered that

Welcome to the site toneeels. First, what is the advertised speed of your service. What operating system are you using and what are the general specs of your system. Also, please let us know what the details of your network are... any routers, switches, hubs... provide some more details and we'll try our best to help you. - CA3LE

cool

Well, I changed it so it doesn't look like a battle thread.... you can make a title that peaks curiosity but a simple title of "yup" is too short. We change titles when they're that short, sorry. ... but seriously, this topic is now mostly just our banter..

With a title of simply, "yup" people who are searching have a hard time finding this. It was changed so that more people will read your post and you'll get more response. I only very rarely do that... but I will especially change the topic title if it contains only 3 letters. "Yup" doesn't provide users or search engines with any relevant information as to what this topic is about... you do want people to read and respond to this, don't you?

Here's a Steve Job's rank on the whole Fragmented vs Integrated issue. I personally feel that both platforms are awesome. My girlfriends dad got an iPhone 4 and after playing with it I'm very impressed. I have a Motorola DriodX and love everything about it. If I were offered a trade, even if the iPhone was on Verizon's network... I'm not sure if I would do it because of how happy I am with my phone. Now, one thing to understand is that Google has left their product open to competitive distribution. Buying an apple product is cool because you know what you're getting... you know that your getting quality hardware backed by quality software. But that doesn't mean that the same can't be true for Android. If you buy a quality model you're going to be happy. I have seen people with problems with Android but it's usually on lesser models, I'm sorry.. but you get what you pay for. Having said that, I think the approach that Google has taken is cool. They leave the public open to options... and the market open to competition. Apple on the other hand... well... your only real option is how much storage space you want. BUT, as I said... it's a quality piece of hardware. For me... Android is the best option. How does it impact users... well, for starters on iPhone.. when you download an app chances are that it will work as intended because there are far less variables. But on Android the same can be true... just make sure you get a good phone, lol. Like I said, I have the DroidX, I haven't seen any apps that didn't work properly. My girlfriend has the HTC Droid Incredible... her phone also works perfectly. Just don't buy a piece of junk and you should be happy with it. -- READ REVIEWS BEFORE YOU PURCHASE. -- An iPhone on the other hand, for the most part, is an iPhone... Android or iPhone... whatever you buy will be outdated in a week anyways