mudmanc4

Fantastic, now go get a brew

hehehhee, ok man, no probs, so is it all ok then so far ? Wireless on and all ?

ok thenif this is router b, then set the top one to disabled. Then the third section will be shaded out. And the gateway will be the router A IP adress

As many times as I have done similar things, I sometimes get it backwards, it is not hard to do, this is why I said maybe I did it by telling you to turn DHCP off on the second router, but what it is, is that the second router must get all IP leases from the first one, and be "null" you want to make it like the hub. So all it is, is a set of physical ports. Just take it slow, and dont change much. Remember, you'll need to make sure oyu power up the devices in order as well. modem, router A, hub, then router B As long as router A is default, then that should be ok, it should allow 50 IP's default, and router B is null.

ok, what did you change after it was working ? This is why I was suggesting starting from beginning, and starting with "wiped" or reset config's on both routers. You should always start from the beginning, set up the modem , first router, get it working , and prove it. SET router B , DHCP off, and make sure the default IP, is NOT the same as router A, just chnge the last octet sets ie. 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.105 << leave the subnet the same ie the 192.168.1.105

This topic has been moved to Off Topic Discussion. [iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=27489.0[/iurl]

Ok, have you set the second router to "client " mode ? If so this may be an issue if you are not connecting router 2 wirelessly, this is why I ask, And YES, it iwll work this way (lan router A to LAN router B ) You should be able to configure the wireless on router B now !

Just make sure yo have the main router on DHCP, all in between off, and end router (AP) set to off DHCP , and make sure the IP on second router is within the main router IP range, you'll be fine. Gotta run eat, so catch up inna minnit

Alright, maybe I did this. Lets start over so we can understand it all ok ? Just tell what you have, and what you want to be, and we'l get it right !

Ok, the main router off the modem should be DHCP enabled, anything in between will need to be null, as with the secondary router (wifi) I think I know what they were referring to now. So the line going to the AP will come from the LAN of the MAin router, to the WAN other AP , and DHCP off on the AP, it will get the IP's from the MAin router.

Looks like it will work out great ! The hub, if it just a switch, then you shouldn't have to do anything no ? And I do not understand how you will get an IP from the device if DHCP is off, and you haven't configured any static IP's. So I dunno where there going with that in your situation. Unless there's more I don't know.

No, you dont need a crossover at all, only thing this is used for , is connecting "like devices " , say you have two machines that will work together for any reason, and or switches, blah blah. Standard 568-B or 568 -A will be the correct wiring. Depending on the rest of the network. Standard would be the latter ( , if you have purchased cables from most anywhere it is B. You should not have to do anything special, I like different subnets for organizations purposes, and security reasons, but it is entirely unnecessary in more applications. And can cause serious configurability issues between machines on different subnets.

Just tell me what is going on , and what you are trying to accomplish

100 meters is max recommended for cat5 , So 100 meters is 328 foot, can you manage that ? Cat 5 is 100BaseT (100 Mbps w/ 100 m range) Cat 5e is 1 Gbps (1000 Mbps) w/ a 75m range Cat 5e ONLY has a 100m range if you get Base-TX. (Not Base-T) Cat 6 is 100m and supposedly can do over 1.2 Gbps You may want to consider an repeater in there (booster) in between if you are close.

Personally I would not play with the wireless in this situation. I'm in about the same situation, accept the other way around, signal source is in the house, so I grabbed enough underground yellow 2" gas line, and buried it in a channel I dug. Got the correct fittings and mounted them. This way, I have a clean , dry and sealed path where wire can be pulled at any time. I ran cat5 plenum inside and terminated with a basic switch. Configured another subnet for the shop, and viola.

You need to do that mock-up for her nano punk, so she can see for herself what you talking about, otherwise mama gets a bit interested when she see's code

Yes ! I agree, sunshine is what makes everything else grow, so why limit it's powers to what we see ? I know this, if I do not get enough sun, then I cannot stand it, I will go get it. You start getting all business, and no happy. Which makes for bad business. So it's a give and take side by side existence I think, good post Buntz !

Your talkin dirty again !!!!!!

Right, but there are more themes for 2.X now, so maybe this should be updated ?

No I agree there, but less likely that someone will be using dial up for there banking. Maybe I'm way off on this, but w/o much security, there has to be an educated thought that whispers * don't do it * hehehe

I dunno, but we were thinking of a snake, or a arachnid of such, so I'll be interested in this also !

LMMFAO

Well I was talking a couple weeks ago with someone who does regular installs, and they shot me this link , have a look, there are many. I'll toss another one up here inna minnit, I have a link on a small local server starting up. Features is what I look for. Not just a unit. Either way, with water, make sure you do your homework. I'm sure you will.

have you entertained the idea of liquid ? It's come a long way,

Yes, maybe, but time is of the essence here lol Glad to se ya buddy !!!!!!