ROM-DOS Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 These are probably close to my 'true' average speeds :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 62 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 8 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Oct 11 23:45:05 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 128 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 75.61 % of your hosts average (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-L28KPRAYS :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 24 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 3 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Tue Oct 11 23:48:11 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 341.33 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 41.18 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BNJ6G187D but on a smaller download file (dial-up burst?) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 184 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 22 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Oct 11 23:50:32 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB download in 46.55 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 121.69 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P21FCSYDB which can make it look like Web pages are loading fast. . . .but, it's all relative, anyway ~ lol I connect with NoCharge.com ~ FREE in Western Washington and some areas on the East Coast. Internet Connect Status: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilNightHawk4 Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 Don't even worry about it Rom-Dos all your scores are [snip] speeds so why don't you stop posting them until you can transfer at those rates. [snip] Edit:For slight flaming & because I needed to test modding.This looked like a good place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 well...i believe you rom-dos...every single one you've posted are real according to the validation link...and ur test history...very consistant...except when u had Comcast...then it was higher... http://www.testmy.net/s_engine.php?type=user_name&q=ROM-DOS i don't quite understand the response he gets to his posted speeds...why not learn from the settings he also posts...this topic explains how is settings work...great help for dialup users... http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=8906.0 evilnighthawk4: y does this even effect u at all...u don't even have dialup...let's see lemme check it out...brb...back looks like u have Comcast...so what do u know about dialup?...go play in ur own sandbox little boy...hahahaha...jk edit to add link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4133 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 504 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:42:56 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.03 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 2.45 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O6972F5IU :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 372 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:43:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.28 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FEIGVZ89B Roadrunner Wireless ( free) ; Tampa, FL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 the funny thing is that rom-doses speeds, while nice, should be technically impossible. if intended to be that fast all modems would have been advertised as 140k, not 56k, i doubt the ad department would have passed on the bigger number. i find it more puzz;ling than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netmasta Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4133 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 504 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:42:56 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.03 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 2.45 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O6972F5IU :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 372 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:43:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.28 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FEIGVZ89B Roadrunner Wireless ( free) ; Tampa, FL What's that have to dial-up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4133 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 504 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:42:56 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.03 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 2.45 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O6972F5IU :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 372 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 2005 08:43:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.28 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FEIGVZ89B Roadrunner Wireless ( free) ; Tampa, FL what's ur point .s1???...this the dialup section...did u accidentally post in the dial up section?? edit: oh wait... i see...ur showing free broadband in FL...i dunno if he lives in FL...does he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 what's ur point .s1???...this the dialup section...did u accidentally post in the dial up section?? edit: oh wait... i see...ur showing free broadband in FL...i dunno if he lives in FL...does he? Yes he does haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 wow then that might be a great deal for him to consider...huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 Yup..especially with those kind of speeds lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilNightHawk4 Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 They are fake scores , like i said he can't download that fast at 22 kb/s so stop posting fake scores it is simple , you are lying about your connection and they are all FAKE so w/e. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuie Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 it's okay...u worry too much...don't worry be happy...it shouldn't effect u at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 These are some tests I did today slower than ROM_DOS's but about average for me.I tried to get the main site to do a cached test but couldn't so I guess CA3LE has fixed that at least for dial-up.So ROM_DOS can't be caching his tests. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 39 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 14:11:42 CDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.81 % of your hosts average (nts-online.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GVHJYIS6C :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 38 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 14:16:13 CDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.75 % of your hosts average (nts-online.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PRQ85E4WM :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 38 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Oct 12 14:21:00 CDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.75 % of your hosts average (nts-online.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7QI83TNRF :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 36 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 256 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.61 % of your hosts average (nts-online.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DJFS1P2CN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 what's ur point .s1???...this the dialup section...did u accidentally post in the dial up section?? edit: oh wait... i see...ur showing free broadband in FL...i dunno if he lives in FL...does he? oh... lol this is the dialup forum init.. oops.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shug7272 Posted October 12, 2005 CID Share Posted October 12, 2005 Nice ROM DOS, you guys need to chill with the attacking people if someone is posting fake scores who cares. Its not a competition. If you want to flame go elsewhere. We dont have a flame section and for good reason. Its not needed here. Try teamxbox they flame alot there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 Nice ROM DOS, you guys need to chill with the attacking people if someone is posting fake scores who cares. Its not a competition. If you want to flame go elsewhere. We dont have a flame section and for good reason. Its not needed here. Try teamxbox they flame alot there. Thanks Shug'a'lug, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted October 13, 2005 CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 ROM-DOS : I have a possible reason you are faster.Your 56K V.92 modem probably uses V.44 compression & your ISP supports V.44. My modem is a V.92 56k but is older & only uses V.42bis compression.My ISP doesn't support V.92 only up to V.90 & I haven't checked to see if they support V.44 compression. MY ISP not free but is only $9.95 a month & unlimited use.I checked for a free ISP but they limit to 10 hours a month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 ch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted October 13, 2005 CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 ROM-DOS ; your modem log shows it tried to negotiate Protocol Negotiation Result: V.42 LAPM Thats probably what it's factory settings what the F in the string has it do.So it is a modem that probably is like mine & doesn't have V.44.So my guess on that was wrong.Then this "Compression Negotiation Result: None" shows it didn't negotiate any. 115200 This is probably in the standard settings for your modem again 921600 is what you have set in Modem Properties maximum speed drop down that's where it is in ME . Connection established at 49333bps thats what you connected at but modem negotiate faster speed when connected for the fastest they can. Then this"Data compression off or unknown" shows the modem compression off.& the MS/MPPC is apparently undetected .But something detects it because it was in a screenshot of your connect to window in details. This is my modem log10-13-2005 11:49:04.45 - HSP56 Modem in use. 10-13-2005 11:49:04.45 - Modem type: HSP56 Modem 10-13-2005 11:49:04.45 - Modem inf path: MDMCHIPV.INF 10-13-2005 11:49:04.45 - Modem inf section: Modem 10-13-2005 11:49:05.23 - 230400,N,8,1 10-13-2005 11:49:05.23 - 230400,N,8,1 10-13-2005 11:49:05.23 - Initializing modem. 10-13-2005 11:49:05.23 - Send: AT<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.44 - Recv: AT<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.44 - Recv: <cr><lf>OK<cr><lf> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.44 - Interpreted response: Ok 10-13-2005 11:49:05.44 - Send: AT&F%N9E0&C1&D2&K6V1W3S0=0<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.45 - Recv: AT&F%N9E0&C1&D2&K6V1W3S0=0<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.45 - Recv: <cr><lf>OK<cr><lf> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.45 - Interpreted response: Ok 10-13-2005 11:49:05.45 - Send: ATS7=60S30=0M1N3%C3&K3B0N1X4<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.45 - Recv: <cr><lf>OK<cr><lf> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Interpreted response: Ok 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Send: AT%N9S91=15S36=7S10=100S25=100<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Recv: <cr><lf>OK<cr><lf> 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Interpreted response: Ok 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Dialing. 10-13-2005 11:49:05.46 - Send: ATDT#######<cr> 10-13-2005 11:49:36.75 - Recv: <cr><lf>CONNECT 41333/PROTOCOL: LAPM/COMPRESSI 10-13-2005 11:49:36.75 - Interpreted response: Connect 10-13-2005 11:49:36.75 - Connection established at 41333bps. 10-13-2005 11:49:36.75 - Error-control on. 10-13-2005 11:49:36.75 - Data compression on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 ch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted October 13, 2005 CID Share Posted October 13, 2005 ROM-DOS :Yes I have Modem Compression enabled when I disabled it the result was no compression the MS/MPPC didn't kick in.I Emailed my ISP to see if they support MPPC but I haven't heard back from them.IN Windows ME if thats where it should activate it doesn't.When I disable compression in Modem Properties I go to about half speed . On phone line I use Cat 3 twisted pair 24 gauge all the way to the NDI. I Have read about 1 of the S commands doing this but it wouldn't be the S11 this is what it does at least in my modem.It would make it dial a little faster or slower depending on the setting. S11 DTMF speed control Set the length of tone and the time between tones for the tone dialing. I don't use anything like catch a call but I think the modem on hold would be the way to go if your ISP supports V.92 standards.If they don't it won't work. I will probably confuse you but mine have 4 twisted pairs (8 wires) But I only use 2 in one of the twisted pairs.The reason for the twisted pair is to reduce line noise & EMI. The basic 4 wire is to have 2 phone lines(phone numbers). I theory I could use mine for 4 phone lines. If you weren't getting the speed you are everything I've read says not to have a phone on the same jack as your PC especially through the modem even if the modem has a phone jack & most do. I'm not the one to ask on drive partitions but I bet one of the members is.I use only a C: partition on my PC.I would try to see if I could access Dial-up networking & modem & maybe network from the E: drive or partition.In dial-up networking there is a make a new connection in the connections drop down you might try that if you can from E: Do you know how to use Hyperterminal? Mostly it is used for modem diagnostics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 14, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 14, 2005 ch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 14, 2005 CID Share Posted October 14, 2005 rom-dos...quit spelling cholla's name that way...it's c-h-o-l-l-a...hahaha jk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netmasta Posted October 14, 2005 CID Share Posted October 14, 2005 I don't think XP has 'Hyperterminal' anymore - I remember that from earlier versions of Windows, though. XP does have HyperTerminal. Start>>All Programs>>Accessories>>Communications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted October 14, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 14, 2005 XP does have HyperTerminal. Start>>All Programs>>Accessories>>Communications. not on mine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts