Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/16/2013 in all areas
-
Yes this is vague because I'm more used to editing aside from designing databases. I'm working on a database (new) where right now it's not going to be used for much aside collecting basic client data ie~ $aa->whatever-name( 'table_name', 'column1, column2, column3, column4, column5, column6, column7', ':Name, :Email, :Subject, :Phone, :PhoneExtension, :Website, :Message', array( 'Name' => $Name, 'Email' => $Email, 'Subject' => $Subject, 'Phone' => $Phone, 'PhoneExtension' => $PhoneExtension, 'Website' => $Website, 'Message' => $Message ) ); Later I plan to insert this data into a form , then insert the form into a customers account, as well as add column(s) for other obvious client information. My question is knowing this later will be heavily used, would I be better off creating a new table for each user / client than this way. I'm talking performance reasons. I've got one chance to get this right , as I say right now this will only collect new clients as they submit a form for a quote, later I will have to create a script to manually add thousands of clients and their current as well as past customer information. Daunting task ahead , so I must get this at least close to as simple as possible. I'm aware this is a basic sql question , but I don't think it will be for long.1 point
-
Pretty fast with BT Infinity: Just annoying about having to use a Homehub (annoying UI and the DNS server doesn't even work properly). Hopefully another router would work.1 point
-
I re checked just to make sure. Windows 8 is still so bad people are not even bothering to steal it.1 point
-
I have multiple service providers and want to setup my routing to route TestMy.net activity to go out on a specific port on the firewall. How can I find out the IP ranges used by testmy for the speed tests? Thanks, Mark1 point
-
Closest back to back / Most consistent speed
CA3LE reacted to changeforwho for a topic
Belkin USB Used with Asus AC Router1 point -
Fantastic this will help a lot. I want the speed test to route over my Satellite provider and not my DSL. This will work great for me. I just need to build the routes and I am all set. Thanks again, Mark1 point
-
No problem, here are the current TestMy.net servers and IP addresses. testmy.net :: (75.126.77.87) tmnstatic.com :: (108.162.199.197) [serves the sites static content such as javascript, css and images] dc.testmy.net :: (50.22.241.82) [Washington D.C.] west.testmy.net :: (50.22.191.251) [seattle, WA] eu.testmy.net :: (5.10.86.18) [Europe / Amsterdam, NL] asia.testmy.net :: (119.81.41.242) [Asia / Singapore, SG] Also...1 point
-
Air Cooling Options?
mudmanc4 gave a reaction for a topic
Hi buddy, i have a mid tower with top bottom front side and rear filters and its completely modular it has the hotswap drive rack and tool-less installation for just about everything. Thanks1 point -
Beat this... :::.. Download Speed Test Result Details ..::: Download Connection Speed:: 273616 Kbps or 273.6 Mbps Download Speed Test Size:: 200 MB or 204800 kB or 209715200 bytes Download Binary File Transfer Speed:: 34202 kB/s or 34.2 MB/s Tested At:: http://TestMy.net Version 13 Validation:: https://testmy.net/db/1IylJsq TiP Measurement Summary:: Min 163.84 Mbps | Middle Avg 322.63 Mbps | Max 323.88 Mbps | 39% Variance TiP Data Points:: 163.84 Mbps, 318.35 Mbps, 274.14 Mbps, 268.44 Mbps, 310.11 Mbps, 311.27 Mbps, 307.28 Mbps, 317.15 Mbps, 312.42 Mbps, 313.01 Mbps, 323.88 Mbps, 312.42 Mbps, 289.76 Mbps, 299.06 Mbps, 307.28 Mbps, 309.54 Mbps, 305.6 Mbps, 282.44 Mbps, 313.59 Mbps More Stats:: https://testmy.net/quickstats/CA3LE https://testmy.net/compID/46056110242 Test Time:: 2013-03-04 15:11:27 Local Time Location:: Dallas, TX US >> Destination:: Dallas, TX US 1MB Download in 0.03 Seconds - 1GB Download in ~1 Minutes - 4886X faster than 56K This test of exactly 204800 kB took 6.134 seconds to complete Running at 552% of hosts average (SoftLayer Technologies https://testmy.net/hoststats/softlayer_technologi) User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0 [!]1 point