php

wow... I don't even wanna know how much $$$$$ that would set you back...

Yea, it's not the monitor. If it was the monitor the screenshot would be fine lol

Yea, it's not gonna show up normal in a browser. It should still be fine though.

Nothing, unless you run Win98 from the second drive and want to access the first drive. Win98 doesn't support NTFS.

Yea... if they knew enough to update I would have a lot less work.

I just MD5'd it just in case It's fine. (Not that I don't trust you or anything... but yea...) Goes in C:WindowsSystem32, has to be replaced in safe mode.

This is part of the reason LCD screens are as expensive as they are... they frequently have to be junked right off the assembly line due to bad pixels.

Try using IE 5.5 with no updates for a while and see how you do. Most of the computers do have protection, but it's not updated very often. Not all of them have had admin rights either.

and the saddest part is that it's true. I'd say for most of the computers I fix, if the owner hadn't used IE or Outlook Express he/she wouldn't be having near as many problems. (If any)

http://www.tinyportal.net/smf/index.php Bloc has some nice themes...

It's not as bad as it sounds... I plugged it in seconds after turning it on when I realised I had forgotten to plug the power cable into it. The bios screen hadn't even loaded yet.

I've only killed a PC once... plugging in a IDE hard drive while the computer was on. It didn't like that so well. Aside from that I've damaged the odd part with static electricity but not an entire computer.

Yes, fairly often with no problems at all. Maxthon is my IE...although I still prefer Firefox by a long shot.

Maybe the same doesn't apply to cable modems, but satellite modems do build up static electricity if they aren't properly grounded. I have no documentation for this, just my own experience and the experience of many others. (Even Direcway tech support, believe it or not... ever wonder why they tell you to disconnect the cables from your modem and touch the ends together?)

It sounds like you're getting intermittent packet loss for some reason.

We aren't as picky about double posting now with the shorter edit time, as long as there is sufficient reason to post again. You still have over 20 minutes to edit your post though, which should be more than sufficient to fix spelling/grammar errors etc. If you need the post edited for some reason you can PM a mod as well.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1206 Kbps about 1.21 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 147 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/22 - 3:18pm Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.97 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.328 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 23.06 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DF19HRSZP :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 943 Kbps about 0.94 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 115 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/22 - 3:19pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 8.9 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 25.985 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 96.22 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N7Y6134RD :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 915 Kbps about 0.92 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 112 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/22 - 3:21pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 9.14 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.782 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 93.37 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Z5M6BOF1Y I guess some things never change... :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 17 Kbps about 0.02 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 2 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/22 - 3:22pm Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 512 sec Tested from a 97 kB file and took 46.24512 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 18.48 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-20SZCO7JB

Well, it is only a 500KB test... it's not going to be very accurate for any high speed internet.

Says in the forum just air...

At 20 posts you will become a Jr. Member

If you're connecting via S-Video you need to set the resolution to 640x480 or close to that, or you won't be able to read anything. Also consider increasing the Windows font size.

Click the New Topic button above the topic list (in the board you want to post in)

Personally I'd rather have an UXGA or SXGA projector.

I think this isn't done commonly (in kits) because of potential condensation problems...