mudmanc4
-
Posts
14,876 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
230 -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by mudmanc4
-
-
I get the throttling issue, ISP's are doing some interesting 'things' since so many are domiciling.
Maybe I'm just not getting the other part, if I am understanding, Frontier is infiltrating your internal network. If so, and don't get upset here, why would you not have a hardware layer segregating internal/external networks?
I say this since I've seen it first hand years ago, where modems are or were on their own /24, ISP side, by network mistake, I found it. Since that point I have been segregating layers via appliances to the best of my knowledge .
-
You've not experienced the grief until you're required to use a 2007 MBP that really should not be using el crappiton
-
7 hours ago, xs1 said:
Well it appears Frontier throttles not only incoming data from outside the network, but even data on my OWN network; From my gaming rig to my server on the SAME network is limited. ?? unbelievable.
Now you have my attention. More info on this statement is mandatory.
-
@nanoco , so you have a GUI on your server ?
-
@JJinPA, I remember that guide, used it, and thank you for your contributions. Be interesting to see what your original account name is .
-
On 12/29/2019 at 5:42 AM, rebrecs said:
Just curious, sidebar: off topic, what do you have on your head in that picture?
@rebrecs It's tin foil ?
How did you end up resolving your dilemma?
-
3 hours ago, CA3LE said:
I remember that... not sure about the date and can't find that file name on my systems.
Maybe around 2016 someone close to TMN made that for us. @coknuck maybe ... or did you make that. I can't remember, it's cool though.
Yea I made it, had fun doing it too
-
-
Nice looking aquarium ?
-
Ah, makes a difference while paying attention
< used this emote because I always enjoyed it for whatever reason 
-
@nanobot , thanks for pointing that out, I thought it was 2mm/ppd average, for red
Strange, when did that get changed to 10
-
The world needs to borrow a foe CPU/GPU processes right now, can we find one in the crowd to turn the testmy.net team #44352 red?
It only takes 2MM PPD (Points Per Day) to turn out stats red in the name of learning more about a virus that is devastating the humanoids.
Even 50PPD helps, your math might have the key!
Grab the software here: https://foldingathome.org/start-folding/
-
-
@Dragaan ,with those speeds I might try turning on multi threading
-
-
@Mobycore , I know we have a nfw flag within the auto test :
I don't blatantly see this feature on the manual test either.
-
Finally grabbed a couple WU's for the coronavirus:
21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:************************************ CBang ************************************* 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Date: Oct 26 2019 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Time: 01:38:35 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Revision: c46a1a011a24143739ac7218c5a435f66777f62f 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Branch: master 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Compiler: Visual C++ 2008 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Platform: win32 10 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Bits: 64 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Mode: Release 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:************************************ System ************************************ 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 970 @ 3.20GHz 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 44 Stepping 2 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: CPUs: 12 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Memory: 23.99GiB 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Free Memory: 20.18GiB 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: OS Version: 6.2 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Has Battery: false 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: On Battery: false 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: UTC Offset: -4 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: PID: 1424 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: CWD: C:\Users\rickl\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\work 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:******************************** Build - libFAH ******************************** 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Version: 0.0.18 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Author: Joseph Coffland <[email protected]> 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Copyright: 2019 foldingathome.org 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Homepage: https://foldingathome.org/ 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Date: Oct 26 2019 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Time: 01:52:44 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Revision: c1e3513b1bc0c16013668f2173ee969e5995b38e 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Branch: master 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Compiler: Visual C++ 2008 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Platform: win32 10 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Bits: 64 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: Mode: Release 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:************************************ Build ************************************* 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7: SIMD: sse2 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:******************************************************************************** 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Project: 14342 (Run 0, Clone 56, Gen 58) 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Unit: 0x0000003a25bb0c305e702d2fc695d7ed 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Reading tar file core.xml 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Reading tar file frame58.tpr 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Digital signatures verified 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Reducing thread count from 11 to 10 to avoid domain decomposition by a prime number > 3 21:31:07:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Calling: mdrun -s frame58.tpr -o frame58.trr -cpt 15 -nt 10 21:31:08:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Steps: first=14500000 total=250000 21:31:11:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Completed 1 out of 250000 steps (0%) 21:33:17:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%) 21:34:02:61:127.0.0.1:New Web connection 21:34:13:WU02:FS01:0x22:Completed 40000 out of 4000000 steps (1%) 21:35:23:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%) 21:37:30:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
-
Hey @php ,how are you getting work units?
I've been getting the following for a minute here. Running RX580 OC 8G + an old i7
20:38:31:WU00:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\Windows\system32\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/win/64bit/beta/Core_22.fah/FahCore_22.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 10760 -checkpoint 15 -gpu-vendor amd -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -gpu 0 20:38:31:WU00:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 6788 20:38:31:WU00:FS01:Core PID:440 20:38:31:WU00:FS01:FahCore 0x22 started 20:38:32:WARNING:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 20:38:32:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Too many errors, failing 20:38:32:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAILED project:14542 run:0 clone:577 gen:1 core:0xa7 unit:0x0000000180fccb045e7fbfbb6cc180f5 20:38:32:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 128.252.203.4:8080 20:38:32:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 20:38:32:WU00:FS01:Starting 20:38:32:WU00:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\Windows\system32\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/win/64bit/beta/Core_22.fah/FahCore_22.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 10760 -checkpoint 15 -gpu-vendor amd -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -gpu 0 20:38:32:WU00:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 10320 20:38:32:WU00:FS01:Core PID:10516 20:38:32:WU00:FS01:FahCore 0x22 started 20:38:32:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 65.254.110.245:8080 20:38:32:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 20:38:33:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 20:38:33:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up 20:38:33:WU02:FS00:Assigned to work server 13.82.98.119 20:38:33:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY cpu:11 from 13.82.98.119 20:38:33:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 13.82.98.119:8080 20:38:34:WU02:FS00:Downloading 2.80MiB 20:38:35:WU02:FS00:Download complete 20:38:35:WU02:FS00:Received Unit: id:02 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:14592 run:440 clone:1 gen:11 core:0xa7 unit:0x0000000b0d5262775e7cee339b65bc86 20:38:36:WU02:FS00:Starting 20:38:36:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\Windows\system32\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/win/64bit/Core_a7.fah/FahCore_a7.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 10760 -checkpoint 15 -np 11 20:38:36:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 3308 20:38:36:WU02:FS00:Core PID:7944 20:38:36:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0xa7 started 20:38:36:WARNING:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 20:38:37:WU02:FS00:Starting 20:38:37:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\Windows\system32\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/win/64bit/Core_a7.fah/FahCore_a7.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 10760 -checkpoint 15 -np 11 20:38:37:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 9104 20:38:37:WU02:FS00:Core PID:10068 20:38:37:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0xa7 started
-
-
12 minutes ago, Pgoodwin1 said:
@mudmanc4 what’s a reserved address block?
Reserved or special use ;
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3330
QuoteRFC 3330 Special-Use IPv4 Addresses September 2002 224.0.0.0/4 - This block, formerly known as the Class D address space, is allocated for use in IPv4 multicast address assignments. The IANA guidelines for assignments from this space are described in [RFC3171]. 240.0.0.0/4 - This block, formerly known as the Class E address space, is reserved. The "limited broadcast" destination address 255.255.255.255 should never be forwarded outside the (sub-)net of the source. The remainder of this space is reserved for future use. [RFC1700, page 4]
3. Summary Table
Address Block Present Use Reference --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0.0.0/8 "This" Network [RFC1700, page 4] 10.0.0.0/8 Private-Use Networks [RFC1918] 14.0.0.0/8 Public-Data Networks [RFC1700, page 181] 24.0.0.0/8 Cable Television Networks -- 39.0.0.0/8 Reserved but subject to allocation [RFC1797] 127.0.0.0/8 Loopback [RFC1700, page 5] 128.0.0.0/16 Reserved but subject to allocation -- 169.254.0.0/16 Link Local -- 172.16.0.0/12 Private-Use Networks [RFC1918] 191.255.0.0/16 Reserved but subject to allocation -- 192.0.0.0/24 Reserved but subject to allocation -- 192.0.2.0/24 Test-Net 192.88.99.0/24 6to4 Relay Anycast [RFC3068] 192.168.0.0/16 Private-Use Networks [RFC1918] 198.18.0.0/15 Network Interconnect Device Benchmark Testing [RFC2544] 223.255.255.0/24 Reserved but subject to allocation -- 224.0.0.0/4 Multicast [RFC3171] 240.0.0.0/4 Reserved for Future Use [RFC1700, page 4]
-
@rebrecs, Have you entertained the idea of using a 1:1 NAT for the website(s) using port forwarding for various web servers ?
-
On 12/24/2019 at 4:35 PM, pillface said:
Before (DSL Modulation set to ADSL2+) https://testmy.net/db/9EYvOW8ap
After (DSL Modulation set to G.dmt) https://testmy.net/db/wzZbGM_zC
Nice, can you list the modem your using?
-
-
5 hours ago, Onira said:
What frequencies are you referring to? I'm sorry, i don't really know that much about all this, I checked a bit around and couldn't find anything about any frequencies at first glance.
Try this:
Navigate in your preferred browser to :
Once there try and login with :
username = admin
password = admin
Look around, see what there is to be seen, possibly find:
Menu >> system tools >> statistics
If not there, data would be elsewhere, get to know your device.
Take a screenshot if you like and post it here.
Frontier Communications: EXPERTS UNITE! >:(
in General Discussion
Posted
Entertain me, have you run scp/large-file to or from local servers, is the throughput what you would expect?
I know you know your shit, I’m just trying to get what your explaining I’m my head