Jump to content

Closest back to back / Most consistent speed


i2d | ScruFFy |

Recommended Posts

  On 6/7/2016 at 6:03 AM, Bunnie said:

Why does the upload speed result on speedtest.net differ so much from testmy.net's result?

Expand  

I also notice the flash test was taking a reading less than 50 miles from your location. Which is like testing your ISP itself, or within or close to your house as possible.

The tests from ookla are many times living on high level nodes running on ports which harbor very little to no traffic, the antithesis of real world downloads.

 

When testing at this proximity, we exclude most real world results. This type of testing as ookla less than 50 miles from your location , also fails to show the peering of the ISP, which is the strength and availability of connected networks.

 

You might do well finding more information , such as running a traceroute to the testmy.net server your testing to/ from, and comparing this to the distance of the flash based test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

@Bunnie

 

There is more to this story isn't there. We can see from Singapore which is the geographical test point location, or origin. When the tests are taken to a testmy.net Singapore server, the tests show very consistent results.

https://testmy.net/quickstats/Bunnie

 

When testing oversea, and not using a flash based test,  here at testmy.net shows functional yet depressed results. This is a great example of having a real world test to show peering and or network issues.

 

Running a traceroute from the origin to the test server will show the points in which the bottleneck in, whether it be specific DPI QOS engineering,  or network congestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2016 at 10:42 AM, Bunnie said:

@mudmanc4

 

Thanks for all the info, really interesting :)

 

On a side note, the connection I am testing from is my own home fibre connection. I have no idea why some Internet Speedtest sites show as "MyHosting", while others show as "MyRepublic", which is an ISP in my country.

Expand  

I see, my thoughts are maxmind is still working to geographical locations of IP blocks, between assigned, ownership, organization and final allocation.

 

None the less, keep testing, check all the servers frequently, the data you acquire can then begin to focus in on where the issues are, and when.

 

Nice connection by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am new to this Forum. I have Centurylink FIBER-OPTIC Internet, recently installed directly to my home (7/29/16), along with Prism TV Basic. It is still cheaper than Comcast was. 

Here are my stats from the test:  https://testmy.net/db/e9g4IjPhQ

Are these good results?

 

Is the testmy.net website good for measuring fiber-optic Internet speeds? Or, is the site designed to measure cable or DSL--not fiber-optic?

 

Thanks for helping out a newbee. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment I'm unaware of how to do tests from the Linux command line using "testmy.net", but using the speedtest-cli (which I saw suggested on another thread here) I get the following results:

 

rhPHqnm.png

 

Hosted by Microsoft Azure, incredibly happy with the speeds, although the upload seems a tad slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

My area got the CMTS upgraded from CISCO to ARRIS.

Went from 8 channels to 16 channels in the downstream.

The speed is the same, but reaches peak speed quicker.

I pay for 100Mb plan and I get 120Mb. 

Of course, my ISP over provisions to 120Mb to make sure that customers get full speed in congestion/peak times.
g4SvyCmzk.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  On 10/21/2016 at 4:55 AM, ITALIAN_GUY_22 said:


Your ISP must over provision so as in congestion/peak time, customers will still get advertised speed.

My ISP does the same.

Expand  

 

 

Mine too. (Virgin Media UK)  I get significantly over the advertised speed even in congested times.  My headline speed is 300Mb, but I now get 331Mb consistently.

 

NLhyWm08S.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im so frustrated. I have been researching router setups and everything for days now. This is Cincinnati Bells Fioptic 30 Mbps package. Everyone is sleeping and Wi-Fi on ALL devices is turned off. The only wifi connection to the router is this dell laptop. There are 3 ethernet connections which are set top/cable boxes.

Supplied router is ZyXel VMG4381-B10A. Checked ZyXl website for firmware upgrade and I cant even find this model. there is a VMG4380 but not 4381. Current Firmware Version: 1.00(AAPU.4)C0

 

Some advice would be gratly appreciated before I call them and get the run around.

 

https://testmy.net/w0UXLTIyN.png
w0UXLTIyN.png

Screenshot (1).png

Screenshot (2).png

Screenshot (3).png

Screenshot (4).png

Screenshot (5).png

https://testmy.net/quickstats/IrishKing

Edited by mudmanc4
Add graph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...