xs1

Its pretty sweet... the download means shit to me cause all i do is share files so the upload is what i was looking for. 5 MB is great.. websites loading is the same, lol not too many sites need to run 20 up i guess

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 20905 Kbps about 20.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2552 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/22 - 6:25am Bottom Line:: 365X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.4 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 4.765 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 256.62 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-EI5Q1GSDU User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 [!]

$49.99/mo for the internet , but i got the tv and phone bundled @ $112.00 /mo

yea its not too shabby... funny trying to find sites with connections large enuff to test.. testmy's upload is laxing

:::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 19555 Kbps about 19.56 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2387 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 4183 Kbps about 4.2 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 511 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/21 - 2:56pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HCDBLEPGK U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-S8TXC7D9K User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 [!] TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.0f click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 4.50Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 19.76Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet click START to re-test

aww lol

Damn i just lost $50 .. mufuka

Gah yea... dont remind me... 'twas 768 / 128 [quote author=TheHalf

Next friday i will be posting some speed test results from my new 20 / 5 ( dl : 2400 kbs ul: 624 kbs aprox. ) line Hopefully it all works out.

everything seems kosher at this end

hehe im the 14th

http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=19813.0

i use 800 x 600.. And using anything over 1152 x 864 for standard use , is ridiculous. squint all you like

1 3.24.1343.static.theplanet.com (67.19.36.3) 0.912 ms 0.294 ms 0.413 ms 2 vl7.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com (67.18.116.65) 0.402 ms 0.362 ms 0.445 ms 3 po41.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.73) 0.429 ms 0.618 ms 0.426 ms 4 et5-1.ibr04.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.13) 0.428 ms 0.402 ms 0.426 ms 5 * te-3-1.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.122.1) 0.583 ms * 6 ae-31-51.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.30) 2.648 ms ae-31-53.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.94) 0.989 ms ae-31-55.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.158) 11.625 ms 7 ae-1-100.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.45) 1.266 ms ae-7-7.car2.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.69.133.41) 24.665 ms 24.675 ms 8 ae-11-11.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.69.133.45) 24.794 ms ae-7-7.car2.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.69.133.41) 24.788 ms ae-11-11.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.69.133.45) 24.947 ms 9 ROADRUNNER.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.79.96.134) 25.245 ms ae-11-11.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.69.133.45) 24.959 ms ROADRUNNER.car1.Tampa1.Level3.net (63.208.0.86) 24.800 ms 10 pos12-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.134) 25.379 ms 27.692 ms 26.723 ms 11 gig0-2.tampflp44-ubr4.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.14.120) 27.618 ms pos12-0-OC-192.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.8.134) 26.559 ms gig0-2.tampflp44-ubr4.tampabay.rr.com (65.32.14.120) 28.184 ms 12 user-142h9vc.cable.mindspring.com (72.40.167.236) 34.513 ms 33.743 ms 35.243 ms

I'll have to agree

lol still stuck on 7/512 here in florida

lol some of these are both appropriate for testmy.net as well as funny! lol

lol that is so gravy. But download is pointless to me.. if i have large things to download ill just leave it run.. its uploading that my biggest problem. Having that for an upload would make me the biggest share whore

Figured id post the difference ( speed test wise) in safari and firefox , for me anyhow. I took 1 test with firefox and (re)tried 3 times in safari , ill post the best of 3. FF: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 6935 Kbps about 6.9 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB) Download Speed is:: 847 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/06/16 - 9:52am Bottom Line:: 121X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.21 sec Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 57.453 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 46.46 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MASRGZT6H User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4 [!] Safari: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 5531 Kbps about 5.5 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB) Download Speed is:: 675 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/06/16 - 9:55am Bottom Line:: 96X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.52 sec Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 72.032 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 16.81 % faster than the average for host (mindspring.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5ZI0AP8FT User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en) AppleWebKit/522.12.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.1 Safari/522.12.2 [!] FF gives 6.7-> 7.2 usually , safari gave 4.2 - > 5.5 I just found it odd.

lol...

Stop with the multi-posts. Just wrap them into one..

easiest way is to bring your phone to your provider and explain the problem. They will sync it to their computer and most likely reboot the software to stock. Its the same basic process as a software/flex/Dsp upgrade. Just bring the phone in.

lol wow.. whats the hell.

No shit lol..

just gave it a try. very smooth... just didnt care for a few things... Like others have mentioned, no spell check.. i didnt like how their was no bottom bar... it felt like the page was just falling into oblivion.. couldnt complete a speed test on server 2 , but did manage to complete one on server 1. The transitions between file sizes were greatly improved as far as smoothness over FF. The skin was kind of bland, for now since it is a beta, but all in all i think its pretty nice. unfortunately , it was too much of a resource hog for my pc to handle, and the added few peeves i mentioned. Ill be sticking with FF for now.